Robert Mueller — “If We Had Confidence President Did Not Commit a Crime We Would Have Said So”

GP ^ | May 29,2019 | Jim Hoft

[genghis]

Good line

[Kid Shelleen]

If We Had Confidence President Did Not Commit a Crime We Would Have Said So”

If We Had any evidence at all the President Did Commit a Crime We Would Have leaked it and I would be taking questions instead of running for cover.

[ClearCase_guy]

Some people are getting very scared. Nothing about this is normal.

It is getting weird.

I'm hoping that with this latest from Mueller, the declassified documents will show up soon.

[jospehm20]

It wasn’t his job to prove President Trump didn’t obstruct anything. It was his job to prove he did and Mulehead the pussy punted on that.

[griffin]

Trying to wrest offensive action and press attention away from Trump/Barr/Durham progress.

[mass55th]

Bull$hit! The fact is that you had no evidence to charge him, and it tells me you didn’t move ahead with obstruction, because you knew you’d never be able to prove it in a court of law. It’s just all smoke and mirrors.

[faithhopecharity]

Ha! The cart before the horse. It was his job to find criminal conduct. Or not. Saying he couldn’t find any chargeable conduct 🤔after two excruciating years of trying — says it all!!! No amount of prevarication or obfuscation now can produce any chargeable evidence of any wrongdoing. He’s exonerated pdjt completely and now he’s only making an ass of himself

[Stravinsky]

Maybe now people will realize what we are really up against.

Just kidding. “Trust the plan”

[edie1960]

High time to DECLASSIFY ALL DOCUMENTS!!!

EXPOSE THE REAL TRUTHS!!

I just pray that President Trump’s trust in AG Bill Barr has not been misplaced.
Remember how Barr and Mule Face have been friends for many, many years.
Hoping and praying that PDJT won’t be burned/betrayed by a second AG.

DRAIN THE SWAMP NOW!!!

[1Old Pro]

Not for nothing, but those statements seem to cancel each other out.

Yep, nothing new. He has no evidence to support obstruction and even if he did it would be unconstitutional to prosecute - It OVER.

[SaxxonWoods]

“Democrats will impeach him after this..”

No they won’t. They will continue doing just what they’ve been doing.

[JerseyDvl]

I know we are all tired of arguing this stupid point and Muller did nothing but muddy the waters.
It’s time to declassify some information right now and change the headlines.

[lodi90]

Got to love the hubris of Mueller dictating to Congress he won’t testify after a $35 million investigation.

[SauronOfMordor]

Democrats will need to start impeachment hearings. This way, they can characterize any investigation of the Deep State as “obstruction of justice”.

[outpostinmass2]

The swamp has spoken..

[NewJerseyJoe]

I'm still trying to figure out what the hell I just listened to. 🤔

My best guess at this point: Mueller tried to provide his own "summary" to contrast to Barr's summary. (Which, BTW, Mueller participated in putting together.)

[Col Frank Slade]

A slimy rat to the very end..

[FLT-bird]

That’s great and all Bob, but your job is not to exonerate. Any person is presumed innocent. The state must prove otherwise to convict. You found no such evidence.

But of course you went to law school and you know that as well as I. You’re just trying to weasel hoping nobody notices your attempt to shift the burden from the state to prove guilt to Donald Trump to prove innocence. Well, we noticed. Your little ploy has failed.

[DoodleDawg]

“If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination if the president did commit a crime.”

So not saying he did and not saying he didn't. That gives ammunition to both sides.

[Stayfree]

MUELLER IS A SNAKE!