Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now AOC gets sued for blocking people on Twitter
wnd.com ^ | 7/10/2019 | unknown

Posted on 07/11/2019 8:30:12 AM PDT by rktman

Cases filed after court rules President Trump can't do that.

On Tuesday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled President Trump is not allowed to block people on his Twitter account, because the social-media page was used for “official purposes” and such a move would violate the First Amendment.

Within hours, one of the far-left newcomers to Congress who has done the same thing, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., also was sued.

The Associated Press reported the decision in Trump’s case “is likely to reverberate throughout politics after the Manhattan court warned that any elected official using a social-media account ‘for all manner of official purposes’ and then excluding critics violates free speech.”

The decision isn’t the first on the issue. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this year found a Virginia political violated the First Amendment by blocking a constituent from a Facebook page.

But the new ruling got a lot more attention because it involves the president.

Now Ocasio-Cortez, the confrontational congresswoman and former bartender known for her far-left views, is facing her own legal action.

Fox News reported it was a former Democratic New York assemblyman who sued her just hours after Tuesday’s court ruling was announced.

Dov Hikind filed the action for her decision to block users on Twitter based on their personal viewpoints.

“Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has blocked me on Twitter yesterday apparently because my critique of her tweets and policies have been too stinging,” Hikind said in a statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: anotheraocthread; bloggers; notnews; ocasiocortez; rentfree; rentfreeonfr; weirdnutdaily; wnd; wymunrights; yesweknow
Me too. Well except I don't have a twatter account. Or snapdragon or gofish or instaBS etc., etc., etc.
1 posted on 07/11/2019 8:30:12 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

What’s good for the Gander is Good for the g00se.


2 posted on 07/11/2019 8:32:13 AM PDT by left that other site (For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Good.

I’m glad to hear people handing back to the dems the very things they have been dishing out.

They would never stop until it came back to bite them.

We’ve been playing too nice for too long.


3 posted on 07/11/2019 8:32:45 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Can we sue twitter itself for blocking people from using it to talk to politicians?


4 posted on 07/11/2019 8:35:54 AM PDT by Crazieman (Civil war is near certain now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
OAC-Stupid-question
5 posted on 07/11/2019 8:38:45 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Pretty sure every single politician who has a Twitter account has blocked people. Time to sue them all! You know... this could lessen Twitter’s influence (which would be a good thing.)


6 posted on 07/11/2019 8:40:38 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (FOX has flipped. I am breaking the FOX habit. I have OANN on my Bookmark Bar now. No more FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

President Trump is not allowed to block people on his Twitter account, because the social-media page was used for “official purposes” and such a move would violate the First Amendment.

Attention everyone in Twitter Jail, this is your cue to SUE Twitter for Violating your First Amendment Rights, they are preventing you from engaging in protected speech with elected officials in direct contradiction to the Appeals Court ruling.


7 posted on 07/11/2019 8:43:39 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Wonder how this ruling will play out on Twitter and YouTube banning conservatives. This could be a good thing.


8 posted on 07/11/2019 8:45:28 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

9 posted on 07/11/2019 9:00:51 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( To internet trolls and mediots telling us that Trump is dumb/evil. The Trump curse will get you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: metmom

AOC on suing and sending subpoenas to anyone connected with President Trump:” Yay! This is more fun than a sleepover. I can hardly tweet fast enough.”

On getting sued herself: “Damn. I hate this. I’ll be so glad when we get revenge on the non-Communists after January 2021. Can hardly wait.”


10 posted on 07/11/2019 9:10:52 AM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we afought for theire finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

True, but wait until the judges do mental gymnastics to rule that democrat politicians can block people from Twitter. We have two rules of law in this country.


11 posted on 07/11/2019 9:13:21 AM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Excellent LMAO!


12 posted on 07/11/2019 9:29:56 AM PDT by melsec (There's a track, winding back, to an old forgotten shack along the road to Gundagai..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

If it weren’t for double standards, the liberals would have none at all.


13 posted on 07/11/2019 9:33:51 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman

SHE’S turned into a real petri dish for corruption and abuse of power.


14 posted on 07/11/2019 9:57:50 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

So why is Trump constrained by this but I could block people? Why 2 rules?


15 posted on 07/11/2019 11:36:18 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: damper99

Sad but true.


16 posted on 07/11/2019 12:25:41 PM PDT by left that other site (For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson