Posted on 10/08/2019 9:42:29 AM PDT by RummyChick
Page always seemed to me to be one of the thousands of single women in DC....single and nearing forty, with no marriage or BF. A lot of them simply have some guy they know (doesn’t qualify for BF status) that they meet for drinks and an hour in the sack...once or twice a month. It’s not a relationship and I doubt if it qualifies as an affair.
Most all of us know that type. One of the revelations of my misspent masculine youth was learning how many women “go home” with an social/work acquaintance or even a random guy from the bar once a month to satisfy their carnal desires. I knew one young woman you could set watch to this type of behavior. It was a different “lucky” guy every month.
BOngino. Whom I LOVE, actually BELIEVES MIST of her testimony!!! NOT ME!
You are a CHEATER,
Just asking for a friend...
I guess it depends on who you lie to, eh?
in clintoon’s case, it was a Grand Jury.
That will get ya in hot water...
lying to Congress...not so much.
“You are a CHEATER”
No, honestly, not by a long shot.
I follow Hubert Humphry’s advice: live clean, think dirty.
LOL!
“I’ve always believed that he was a plant.”
Yeah, because in August of 2015 everyone in the circles of power took Trump seriously enough to talk US Senator Jeff Sessions into appearing onstage with Trump at a time when absolutely no one else in the GOP would give him the time of day. /sarcasm
“That’s because an affair is usually none of the public’s business.
Am I wrong here?”
Page and Strzok were married FBI agents with top security clearances. Secret, extramarital affairs among such people are always of great concern because of the risk of blackmail or other forms of compromise. So, yes, you are wrong about this.
I wouldn’t admit to getting boinked by that jerk either. (If I were a gal, and doubly so as a guy). ;)
Ambition and power had taken over her brain. Old Pete was a means to an end until no longer useful.
“the risk of blackmail or other forms of compromise. So, yes, you are wrong about this.”
I’m not wrong about affairs being private affairs. The problem you’re speaking of is because of blackmailability which can be caused by things other than sex.
“The problem you’re speaking of is because of blackmailability which can be caused by things other than sex.”
(1) all secret extramarital affairs are potentially “blackmailable”
(2) not all potentially “blackmailable” events are secret extramarital affairs
“all secret extramarital affairs are potentially “blackmailable””
Big difference between blackingmailing over a wife and blackmailing over national secrets.
“Big difference between blackingmailing over a wife and blackmailing over national secrets.”
People with top-secret clearances, like Strzok and Page, who engage in *secret* extramarital affairs (or who have engaged in other *undisclosed* embarrassing or illegal activity) are subject to blackmail by those who know about this activity and seek access to classified information through blackmail. It is common practice in the intelligence community, for example, to subject everyone with high-level security clearances to periodic lie detector tests. Deceptive answers to certain personal questions (e.g., “are you having an affair?”, “did you smoke MJ in college?”) raise serious security concerns. Honest answers to such questions do not, typically raise such concerns.
A stiff d*ck (as well as FBI agents) has no conscience.
I think Page was unmarried. Smarmy Strzok is (or was) married.
GUESS WHO?....................
Among the other revelations in 'Deep State' is that former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein had the support of two cabinet colleagues for invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. Stewart claims that it was former chief of staff John Kelly and former Attorney General Jeff Sessions who said they might back it. Pictured: Rosenstein and Sessions .................
Every time I think of the phrase, “Trust Sessions”, I see his presence clearly as a plant. And all that “Trust Sessions” bull as just something to placate and silence bystanders who might actually do something to help President Trump.
Seeing how FR was instrumental in uncovering a scam or two previously, it makes sense some might try to troll here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.