Posted on 10/30/2019 4:31:01 PM PDT by LibWhacker
Good grief. It will take most of the night to read this thing. Been better to give the web site it is on and we could have gone there and printed it and read it in the “home reading room” over the next several days and left it there on the laundry hamper until finished.
There is a reason they dont want him to testify and it has nothing to do with protecting his identity.
“Been better to give the web site it is on and we could have gone there “
He did. Twice.
There is no whistle blower because there is no whistle.
It is all scripted theater. The unblown whistle involves a democrat apparatchik
This was known almost three weeks ago.
http://www.floppingaces.net/2019/10/11/the-cia-spy-in-white-house-identified/
This hack is not a whistleblower. He or she is a partisan hack.
A leaker, who must be treated as a National Security Leaker.
Thanks for the info.
BTTT
Biased, set up with CIA and Schiff to destroy Trump. Imagine that./s
Here we thought he was like that self-loving Colonel Vindman who said it was his “honor and sacred duty” tso undermine and undercut Trump, whom he despises. The P.O.S Vindman./s
Do tell.
Theyre hiding him, Fleitz asserted. Theyre hiding him because of his political bias."
So Fred, you're saying Fox News, The Washington Times, The Federalist, The Daily Caller, Breitbart, etc. are hiding it because of his political bias?
After all, everyone knows.
Youre right, this was all over FR ten days ago.
Yep name been around since early October. Tonight seems to be breaking on several sites. Will be interesting to see if MSM picks it up. Of course, MSM may have been threatened with legal action by Schiff or WB lawyer.
🚨BREAKING 🚨
The White House whistleblower is Eric Ciaramella.
- Registered Democrat
- Worked for Obama
- Worked with Joe Biden
- Worked for CIA Director John Brennan
- Vocal critic of Trump
- Helped initiate the Russia collusion investigation hoax
https://t.co/4rSdvIvkyZ— Benny (@bennyjohnson) October 30, 2019
First, they don't want to "click" on a source's website and complain that the entire article should have been posted.
Then they complain that the entire text of the article has been posted and it is too long for them to read, so they want to know why the link to the website of the source wasn't used so they can read it later.
In this case, both mechanisms were used by the poster. They posted the entire article AND provided the link to the original article twice.
There is no pleasing some moaners, groaners, complainers and whiners.
Good grief, make up your minds.
I still want to know who changed the meaning of a whistleblower so they could report second hand information.
After all, everyone knows.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Washington reality does not dictate how they act.
Everyone knew Obama was not a natural born citizen but they all acted like he was.
Everyone knows who the whistleblower is but they act like they don’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.