Posted on 01/04/2020 3:13:37 PM PST by Enlightened1
Iran is talking very boldly about targeting certain USA assets as revenge for our ridding the world of their terrorist leader who had just killed an American, & badly wounded many others, not to mention all of the people he had killed over his lifetime, including recently....
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1213593965838163968
....hundreds of Iranian protesters. He was already attacking our Embassy, and preparing for additional hits in other locations. Iran has been nothing but problems for many years. Let this serve as a WARNING that if Iran strikes any Americans, or American assets, we have....
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1213593974679769093
....targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1213593975732527112?s=20
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Go ahead. Make my day.
Can you just see him blowing the smoke off his gun barrel?
Have the radio stations started playing Bette Midler’s antiwar song “From A Distance” ?
Even mentioning revenge should get them hit again, hard.
If Iran has now raised the red flag and is calling for “revenge” and threatening to kill Americans, what’s their excuse for continuously targeting and killing Americans BEFORE the Trump administration killed some of their terrorists? Wasn’t revenge before. What was it? Blood lust? Genocidal fantasies?
You know what? I’m going to go kill John Wick’s dog. I mean — what’s the worst that could happen?
Love the symbolism .... 52 for 52.
Maybe now some 'shop wizard will come up with one with a few fully loaded drones ;-)
An Iranian General invaded Iraq to attack Americans in Iraq.
Seems pretty cut and dried to me.
He needed to die.
If the Iranian leaders are unhappy about it, well, stay the hell out of Iraq and stop trying to harm Americans.
No...it was merely being an “honest” moozlum. Read the quran.
Then...
It was the one reason I thought deposing Saddam wasn’t the best idea, because I felt Iran would be the big winner from it.
Saddam could have been neutralized, while still providing a buffer against Iran.
No one wants war but most of us would like to see a good old fashion non PC ass kicking.
40 years later, Trump dishes it out cold.
Of course Soleyman is the only one who could have pulled it off, but...
Iran really does not have many options.
Yes, they could stage a terrorist attack, and then what?
After three years of President Trump is it possible to believe they still think he bluffs?
A war against Iran would not require boots on the ground. We have the power and technology to reach out and touch any part of Iran and there is nothing they can do to stop us.
So what are they going to do?
Again, they may managed to kill a few Americans but we can destroy their economy (take out their refineries), return them to the dark ages (take out their electrical grid system), take away their military (sink their navy and destroy their air force) and all this from hundreds if not thousands of miles away.
So as Clint Eastwood would say, “Are you feeling lucky punk?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.