Skip to comments.
Is America Ready to Decriminalize Meth and Heroin?
National Review ^
| February 11, 2020
| David Harsanyi
Posted on 02/11/2020 7:49:42 PM PST by karpov
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: Blood of Tyrants
So do alcoholics. Do you want to bring back Prohibition?
41
posted on
02/12/2020 1:35:42 AM PST
by
jmacusa
("If wisdom is not the Lord, what is wisdom?)
To: karpov
We have more than enough Lotus Eaters on the dole already. We dont need any more.
42
posted on
02/12/2020 2:39:51 AM PST
by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: Blood of Tyrants
“I dont mind idiots destroying their own lives with drugs, but too often they destroy the lives of their children, too.”
Also, as things stand now I help pay their medical and rehabilitation expenses.
Legalizing prostitution, drugs, etc., sends a message that they’re ok. That’s a major reason I don’t want them legalized.
To: karpov
Alcohol is something that is easily detectable... but the legal framework for alcohol abuse will not work with drugs.
How do you readily detect the drug users and how do you regulate drug users driving vehicles, which is to say what are the timeframe restrictions between usage and driving. That same question then applied to school attendance, or work.
People taking drugs immediately before work or on the job are an endangerment to everyone in the workplace. And what of productivity?
Legalization of drugs is a one-way ticket to Government Health Care.
Read that again - Government Health Care.
44
posted on
02/12/2020 4:52:21 AM PST
by
Jumper
To: cherry
45
posted on
02/12/2020 5:01:45 AM PST
by
Big Red Badger
(Despised by the Despicable!)
To: karpov
Tulsi is for decriminalizing both. I saw her on Hannity and her constant avoidance of answering that question made it obvious.
46
posted on
02/12/2020 5:05:58 AM PST
by
MayflowerMadam
("Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength" - Corrie ten Boom)
To: karpov
I have seven low end rentals in a rural county. Last year I had to evict two middle income families because the WIFE got involved in drugs (meth I think) and ended up in jail. The houses were a wreck. I spent $15,000 on one and $10,000 on the other. The children in both cases were neglected despite a husband trying his best to take care of the kids and his wife’s habit. In these cases prison was the only chance for these families and the best possible path forward as the husbands were in denial and enabling the behavior to keep their marriages together.
One of these families I really felt sorry for the man as he tried so hard. But I have mortgages to pay and I had to get them out before the wife set the house on fire or overfilled a tub for eight hours. (That happened to another landlord I know.)
In both cases the kids were turned over to relatives who were, I gather, desperate to get the kids away from the situation.
The husband above told my helper, “I am really sorry, “Donna” is f@cking crazy.”
To: karpov
Sanctuary for pimps hoes and John’s as long as they pay their taxes
48
posted on
02/12/2020 6:00:16 AM PST
by
Kalija
To: Gen.Blather
Thanks for your story. I wonder if there should be stricter drug laws for parents of minor children. One can argue that a childless person has the right to destroy his or her life, but parents have responsibilities.
49
posted on
02/12/2020 6:04:30 AM PST
by
karpov
To: Daffynition
Actually a modified form of the "Four Pillars" approach seems like the most likely model to be successful. What the US and most of the world is doing now is not successful (well you can go with the Phillipines method of immediate execution of drug dealers) to decrease drug dependence.
By the government dispensing the drugs (Bernie Sanders FREE!) linked to a rigorous therapy and work requirements, you have provided the incentive to stay in the program and kick the habit, stay productive, provides alternative to drug dealers (hurts their profits) and change the the attitude of users to want to be drug free.
The second part is to not treat users out of the program (for those unfortunates who OD, no Narcan for you). If they die, they die. So those outside of the program are paying more for drugs and taking a chance of ODing and dying.
50
posted on
02/12/2020 6:36:25 AM PST
by
BipolarBob
(Joe Biden: "We can't let Trump keep on making America great".)
To: RedStateRocker
I see nothing in my copy of the constitution wherein the federal government is given any authority over what I put in my body, only by implication the authority to punish me if I harm others as a result.Yup. The only drug mentioned in the Constitution that I have found is alcohol, and that was added and removed through the amendment process. There are still a lot of drug warriors here on FR. It's not a popular position to take here.
The only legitimate action the government should be able to take regarding drugs would be questions regarding purity and truth in labeling, as both could be considered fraud.
51
posted on
02/12/2020 7:11:08 AM PST
by
zeugma
(I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
To: cherry
it takes many rounds of treatment for a small number of people to be cured....and its not really a cureHow many addicts has prison cured?
52
posted on
02/12/2020 7:14:19 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: jmacusa
I’m saying let’s not add to the problem.
53
posted on
02/12/2020 7:19:36 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(If gun ownership by private citizens scares DemocRats, the 2nd Amendment is doing its job.)
To: cymbeline
54
posted on
02/12/2020 7:20:08 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(If gun ownership by private citizens scares DemocRats, the 2nd Amendment is doing its job.)
To: Blood of Tyrants; jmacusa
I dont mind idiots destroying their own lives with drugs, but too often they destroy the lives of their children, too.So do alcoholics. Do you want to bring back Prohibition?
Im saying lets not add to the problem.
Why, in your view, shouldn't we subtract from the problem by bringing back Prohibition?
55
posted on
02/12/2020 7:24:32 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: cymbeline
Also, as things stand now I help pay their medical and rehabilitation expenses.Ditto for alcohol abusers and overeaters. Should the government therefore ban alcohol and regulate individuals' caloric intake? I say no.
Legalizing prostitution, drugs, etc., sends a message that theyre ok. Thats a major reason I dont want them legalized.
It's legal for me to tell my wife she's ugly. Does that send a message that it's OK? Should it be made illegal? I say no.
56
posted on
02/12/2020 7:27:10 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
Don’t be a dumbass. Decriminalizing drugs is the same as sending a message that it’s okay.
57
posted on
02/12/2020 7:50:58 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(If gun ownership by private citizens scares DemocRats, the 2nd Amendment is doing its job.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Why, in your view, shouldn't we subtract from the problem by bringing back Prohibition?Dont be a dumbass. Decriminalizing drugs is the same as sending a message that its okay.
Nonresponsive.
It's legal for me to tell my wife she's ugly. Does that send a message that it's OK? Should it be made illegal? I say no.
58
posted on
02/12/2020 7:55:04 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
Stupid questions do not require a sensible answer.
59
posted on
02/12/2020 8:03:16 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(If gun ownership by private citizens scares DemocRats, the 2nd Amendment is doing its job.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
You lose. Take a hankie and a Tucks on your way out the door.
60
posted on
02/12/2020 8:08:47 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson