Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump, call for a snap Constitutional Convention.
Self | 11-5-20 | Self

Posted on 11/05/2020 3:44:36 PM PST by StAnDeliver

President Trump, call for a snap Constitutional Convention per Article V. Appoint yourself as Convenor/Chairman, but do not do so as President.

The Convention is immediately called to order viz a National Emergency viz the current and surging pandemic; that the 34-state ratification will take place at the Convention's convening; and any state failing to send Convention representatives will not participate.

Order Constitutional Convention business to be resolved by March 25, 2021.

Only 3 items may be considered in the Constitutional Convention Order of Business:



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conconv; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 11/05/2020 3:44:36 PM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

He doesn’t have the power to call a constitutional convention under Article V. It can only be called by “The Congress . . . on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states...”


2 posted on 11/05/2020 3:49:53 PM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Add a marriage amendment and a human life amendment


3 posted on 11/05/2020 3:52:55 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

So, get rid of the 3/5ths clause and the 13th ammendment...???

After a convention of state, which is required and the current president can only be ex officio...


4 posted on 11/05/2020 3:56:09 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Someone has to much time on their hands....


5 posted on 11/05/2020 3:57:49 PM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

From the few replies already you see some problems. You call for a convention, it is open season on the Constitution. It cannot be limited afaik to the matter at hand but open to all ideas.

And I am not in favor of a 4-year Senate term. There is a good reason the framers structured it the way they did and that was precisely to prevent “faddish ideas” from sweeping the Republic. It was designed to slow things down and let cooler heads prevail by rotating 1/3 of the Senate every 2 years.

Though I will admit, with party politics and the fealty politicians owe to the party (think about how much someone would owe to Chuck Schumer if he raised $100 million to get that person a $150,000 a year job) that protection has been eroded.


6 posted on 11/05/2020 3:58:21 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Sorry. The only Constitutional Convention I will support is one aimed dissolving the union.

I don’t want a new or rewritten constitution. I want to see The Republic of Texas arise again.


7 posted on 11/05/2020 3:59:19 PM PST by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beancounter13

p.s. Any state in Flyover Country is welcome to join us.


8 posted on 11/05/2020 4:03:39 PM PST by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
Lawmakers call for federal constitutional convention

As far as I understand it, a President cannot call for one.

9 posted on 11/05/2020 4:13:57 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
1) Remove every reference in the United States Constitution to "slavery". No other changes may be made in this regard.

The only reference to slavery is in the 13th Amendment. You want to repeal that?

10 posted on 11/05/2020 4:17:56 PM PST by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

No.


11 posted on 11/05/2020 4:19:02 PM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

It is appalling how people come up with ideas that are not only dangerous and incorrect, but do not understand the actual constitution. The notion of a SNAP constitutional convention would allow mob and majority rule every four years. Thank God our framers new better

For the record, an Article V convention carries an extremely high bar. It can originate in the states with a supermajority the state legislature demanding that the federal congress schedule the convention OR 2/3 of both house chambers with approval of 3/5 of the states would yield to a convention

Once the convention is opened, it has the full force of possibly causing a runaway convention where it is as equally likely that we would under of with abortion on demand the destruction of republic for national votes etc.

This is not only a terrible idea, but an uneducated on at best.


12 posted on 11/05/2020 4:20:37 PM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Nope.


13 posted on 11/05/2020 4:21:58 PM PST by JCL3 (As Richard Feynman might have said, this is reality taking precedence over public relations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

That would be unconstitutional.


14 posted on 11/05/2020 4:22:20 PM PST by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Sure, call for a new constitution because we don’t honor the original. What makes you think it will make any difference?

A new convention is an exercise in futility at best. But it would likely be hijacked by the liberals in media and education and become our worst nightmare. You think Antifa and BLM are something now? A new CC would be a disaster.


15 posted on 11/05/2020 4:29:16 PM PST by Loud Mime ("Now, go and do your duty before darkness covers the earth." Michael Uhlmann (1939 - 2019))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
It is the individual state Legislatures that call for the convention. Trump could travel to each state and lobby for that vote though. The Convention of States request has an end clause that nullifies the call if the Convention goes beyond the conditions of the request. Hard to justify a run away Convention if it nullifies itself. The only REAL worry is that some good amendments won't pass the 3/4 ratification requirement.
16 posted on 11/05/2020 4:37:26 PM PST by Nateman (If the left is not screaming, you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beancounter13

I’ll see your Republic of Texas and raise it with The Great Lone Star Republic of California


17 posted on 11/05/2020 4:40:30 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck
"The only reference to slavery is in the 13th Amendment. You want to repeal that?"

Oh Lord, do I have to spell it out?

In the US Constitution, the Three-fifths Compromise is part of Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."


18 posted on 11/05/2020 4:55:31 PM PST by StAnDeliver (I've got your Third Rail of Politics right here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
"on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states...”

"The Convention is immediately called to order viz a National Emergency viz the current and surging pandemic; that the 34-state ratification will take place at the Convention's convening; and any state failing to send Convention representatives will not participate."


19 posted on 11/05/2020 4:56:40 PM PST by StAnDeliver (I've got your Third Rail of Politics right here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

not going to happen. A convention would risk the whole constitution. Do we really want calif to petition to drop the 1st and 2nd?


20 posted on 11/05/2020 4:58:51 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.tand http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson