Posted on 03/23/2021 4:18:37 PM PDT by Dead Corpse
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear oral argument in Caniglia v. Strom, a case that could have sweeping consequences for policing, due process, and mental health, with the Biden Administration and attorneys general from nine states urging the High Court to uphold warrantless gun confiscation. But what would ultimately become a major Fourth Amendment case began with an elderly couple’s spat over a coffee mug.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
Never put your fate into the hands of a compromised pedophile.
Yep, it’s a fool’s errand hoping for Constitutional law coming out of the Supreme Court.
We have reached banana republic corruption levels, it’s simply not sunk in with the Sheeple. Probably never will.
The Sheeple get their
Marching orders on
The 6 o’clock NEWS.
Sad.
That means at least four justices think the case should be overturned, and they think they have the votes to do it.
It is primarily a Fourth Amendment case.
The "gun" part is whether the court will implicitly find their is a "gun" exception to the Fourth Amendment.
They have not done so, so far.
There was a similar case in Wisconsin, where the appellate ruling upheld the police.
This should be overturned by the Supreme Court.
First they come for the guns...then they come for the people!
“A rule that allows police to burst into your home without a warrant whenever they feel they are acting as ‘community caretakers’ is a threat to everyone’s security.”
since Roberts already sold out the USA
and his wife may be a compromised as him,
why is he allowed to stay on the court at all.
he whacked Justice Scalia.
He SWORE POTUS would not win,
and could not win.
why is he allowed to stay on the court at all.
oh, i forgot. Malta rules America, and we
are but slaves to other countries, now sold
en mass by the First Pedophile.
“First they come for the guns...then they come for the people!”
They HAVE to take away the guns before they go after the citizens.
If the Supreme Court says someone can seize anything without a warrant, the same would apply to seizing a Supreme Court justice.
The forecast: widespread noncompliance accompanied by occasional showers of hot lead and brass, turning into widely scattered piles of corpses.
No court has done so since 1932.
So I will have to do what I have done when they have ruled against the constitution in the past and ignore the ruling.
This is a dangerous path but I have no other choice.
Allow this and we are back to King George III. it will not end well for the politicians.
they already seize whatever they want.
heck, the American backstabbing Roberts, and his beard,
do whatever they want. whenever they want.
he wrote TWO opinions for Obamacare so his Maltese
Overlords (human?, certainly not American)
could tell the backstabber what to do.
how do you think they get their children and baby victims?
I believe this is incorrect.
They performed a warrantless search and confiscated the guns by means of uttering a falsehood, namely that the husband had agreed to the removal of the guns.
A warrantless search and the taking of property by deception. That to me is theft.
ZERO faith, also. As Warren said, “in a democracy, it’s Majority rules.”
The US Constitution, the article that binds this Form of Republican Government together, will be dissolved,
Four justices? Is one of Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett believed to be leaning to the left on the Second Amendment?
Dear Chief Justice Roberts,
One day, it might be one of us, “Deplorable Gun Owning Americans,” who is going to rescue your a$$ and your family’s from the leftist onslaught once the left decides that their, “Useful idiots,” have served their purpose and they make the decision to hunt you down for your burdensome decisions of the past.
Please consider this. Because it has happened before.
Four justices? Is one of Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett believed to be leaning to the left on the Second Amendment?No, but four is the minimum needed to vote to grant a writ of certiorari. (to hear the case)
They would seldom vote to hear a case they were not willing to overturn, and believe they could, in a politically charged issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.