[governsleastgovernsbest]

[governsleastgovernsbest]

Pathetic NY Times has Ol’ Joe’s back on bad jobs report.

Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.

[BenLurkin]

“They could be adjusted next month”

No doubt.

[Richard Axtell]

Stupid people say stupid things. In this case, they make stupid excuses, so that other stupid people will believe them.
Stupid.

[econjack]

They could be adjusted next month and it could be a very different story."

Always look for the words "may" or "could" because they are consistent with anything and neither confirm nor deny anything. The ultimate weasel words.

[wildcard_redneck]

Get ready for a lot of:
“Unexpectedly......”
“Unexpectedly......”
“Unexpectedly......”
“Unexpectedly......”

[agatheringstorm]

Yeah, they might be revised....down. Keep in mind, when the April jobs report came out, the BLS also adjusted the March jobs numbers from 916,000 down to 760,000.

Furthermore, regardless of the fact that the BLS is technically part of the Executive branch, there is a very curious trend to their unemployment/jobs statistics based solely upon whether a Democrat or Republican is in the White House. For example, under Obama ALL monthly jobs statistics would be revised down the following month. In other words, the BLS consistently overestimated the number of jobs created each month under Obama, only to revise the numbers down the following month. Under Trump, the exact opposite occurred. Trump’s jobs numbers would be revised up every month, like clock work.

This same bias in reporting was witnessed in quarterly economic growth numbers published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Obama’s quarterly GDP statistics would be revised down a month later, where Trump’s would be revised up. This bias was consistent throughout their presidencies.

So, do not be at all surprised to see the April jobs numbers revised down from 266,000.

[DoodleDawg]

PATHETIC New York Times Covers for Biden: Bad Jobs Numbers a 'Real Fluke'

I suppose we'll find out the first part of June whether it's a fluke or a trend.

[antidemoncrat]

“PATHETIC New York Times Covers for Biden: Bad Jobs Numbers a ‘Real Fluke’”

The MSM covering for Joe? The Fourth Estate has become the Farce Estate.

[monkeyshine]

A real fluke eh? There is about a 1 million person backlog on unemployment applications in California alone. Many people haven’t received any UI money since February.

Funny how everything was working fine when Trump was POTUS. Then Biden gets elected they pass that $1.9 trillion bailout of the states, and voila the state is no longer capable of processing unemployment applications.

Not funny haha funny, but funny in a pathetic ugh kinda way. They wouldn’t be trying to hide the real numbers would they? What with Newsome up for recall and an empty suit as POTUS to cover for and everything...

[jaydubya2]

Our local paper didn't mention that unemployment was up, it said “there were more job opportunities available!”

[TBP]

Another lie by the New York Times. As they well kinow, this is the result of Dhimmicrap policies.

[upchuck]

BuckFiden is ridiculous. His brain and scrambled eggs have a lot in common. He said:

" We're going to make it clear that anyone who is collecting unemployment who is offered a suitable job must take the job or lose their unemployment benefits."

Assume I'm collecting these benefits and an employer offers me the same as I'm getting from unemployment. I turn down the job.

Now, how does the gvt know that happened? The point is that BuckFiden's statement doesn't make any sense, like most of what he mumbles.