Posted on 08/24/2021 7:41:45 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
(LifeSiteNews) — Ohio attorney Thomas Renz made waves last month when he announced a lawsuit alleging that there have been at least 45,000 deaths connected with the experimental COVID-19 shots currently on the market, according to sworn testimony from an expert whistleblower.
Renz told LifeSiteNews in an interview ahead of his appearance at the Truth for Health Foundation’s “Stop the Shot” townhall conference this week that 45,000 is a low-ball estimate, and his federal lawsuit seeks to prove it.
Based on a statement from the whistleblower signed under penalty of perjury, Renz has filed a motion on behalf of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
The lawsuit seeks to stop the HHS from continuing to authorize the COVID-19 shots for emergency use, and to prevent full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the drugs.
Renz said informed consent is “a critical aspect” of the lawsuit.
“It is a very, very fundamental aspect of this,” he told LifeSite. “How do you give informed consent on the dangers of a medicine if those dangers are being kept secret?”
Renz, who is also the lead attorney in several other high-profile cases against federal agencies related to fraud and violations of medical freedom rights, said he has evidence to show that the 45,000 deaths reported by the whistleblower are actually drastically underestimated.
“We took really the most conservative estimate we could in this because we wanted to make sure that we were being more conservative rather than less,” Renz said. “Some of the numbers that I have evidence on are astronomically higher.”
Renz’s whistleblower is a government-related computer programmer who works in healthcare data analytics. Identified only as “Jane Doe,” she has declared under penalty of perjury that according to medical claims submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) are “under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5.”
But Renz said the programmer with access to CMS data was not the only one to come forward. Another whistleblower contacted Renz this week, claiming the VAERS database is far behind in its reporting.
Renz said that according to the whistleblower, “There are at least a hundred thousand reports that are not in VAERS that should be. There’s really no reason really at all that they’re not there.”
“But here’s really the key thing that everybody’s got to ask themselves,” he said. “Why do we have to guess? Why isn’t the government making the truth about this known? They have 11 or 12 different methods by which they collect data on this. Why isn’t this being properly analyzed and made public? Why did I have to get a whistleblower to analyze it?”
Renz said that if the government is not interested in analyzing the data, “I’ve got some people who will fund an independent analysis.”
“If they don’t want to trust the whistleblower, that’s fine. Give us the raw data. I will have an independent analysis done and we’ll see what it actually says.”
The Ohio attorney said there is a “huge conflict of interest” among public health agencies and the pharmaceutical companies responsible for manufacturing COVID-19 shots, and argued that public health officials are “hiding behind the cloak of government immunity.”
According to Renz, the emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for the injections help shield government agencies from responsibility for accurately reporting adverse reactions and deaths.
“Here’s the real shady thing,” he said. “Under existing law and existing precedent, if this were fully approved rather than just authorized under EUA, the vaccine companies would have to advertise it, under the rules for informed consent. Because it’s not approved, because it’s only authorized as an [EUA], the vaccine companies aren’t saying too much.”
“Where you’re hearing ‘safe and effective’ is from government officials who have a vested interest, who are getting paid, who are getting money from their own interests in this,” said Renz, noting that HHS holds intellectual property rights for the Moderna shots.
“So, we’ve got the people who own these vaccines, partial owners, acting as the gatekeepers as to whether it’s safe,” he explained. “It’s absolutely corrupt beyond words.”
Renz said he believes the public health agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and members of the legacy media are motivated by a variety of factors, but that what “the different groups have in common… is that the people promoting this narrative are all getting something out of it.”
“Some people are in it for money, some are in it for power, or for both. Some hate America and want to see America weaken. I mean, remember, China is very intimately involved in this. And China absolutely hates America and hates freedom.”
“But the other side, our side, are people who are being ridiculed in the media, they’re losing their licenses. They’re losing their jobs,” Renz said. “They’re losing their money. They’re losing everything. And so the real issue is, who do you trust? Do you trust the people who are getting attacked for asking for full disclosure of the truth? Or do you trust the people who are saying ‘you don’t need the truth, you should just trust us,’ while they’re making billions of dollars?”
Renz said he believes COVID-19 vaccine mandates “are illegal” and slammed Republican governors, legislators, and others who have stood by while employers have begun forcing their employees to get the experimental drug or lose their jobs.
“That is absolute garbage,” Renz argued. “If you are a conservative thought leader and you are not talking about individual rights, you have a problem.”
The attorney said the fight for individual freedom against COVID-19 mandates is “a battle of good and evil.”
“Ultimately this goes to where we have to be and what America was always meant to be, which is self-determination and individual responsibility.”
Fight Pfascism—Big Pharma and Pfizer fascism.
Hey, the ‘fda’ says the benefits outweigh the risks so...... The old “You have to break a few eggs to make a pancake.” rule.
Even if it kills tens of thousands, people will still hate you far attempting to stop the poison vaccines from being used.
The fda and cdc approved the tuskegee experiment safe for 40 years,,40 years the lied and killed people for science,,but we should believe them now?
Two points:
First point. “Here’s the real shady thing,” he said. “Under existing law and existing precedent, if this were fully approved rather than just authorized under EUA, the vaccine companies would have to advertise it, under the rules for informed consent. Because it’s not approved, because it’s only authorized as an [EUA], the vaccine companies aren’t saying too much.”
Pfizer has been fully approved so this OBE.
Second point:
“Renz said he believes COVID-19 vaccine mandates “are illegal” and slammed Republican governors, legislators, and others who have stood by while employers have begun forcing their employees to get the experimental drug or lose their jobs.”
Renz isn’t much of a lawyer. Even a cursory search will disclose that vaccine mandates were found to be constitutional since 1907.
If Renz is so mistake on two critical points, then why should we believe anything else he says.
Where can I donate? God bless his efforts
Good luck finding a judge who isn’t bought and paid for, or simply a coward.
“Pfizer has been fully approved so this OBE.”
Lololol. Yeah, I’m sure they completed they years-long phase IV trials just like any other “approved” treatment.
I got a solution that I think will make both sides happy : if you want the vaccine you should get it. If you don’t want to get it then (especially if you’re under 60 and fairly healthy) than don’t get it.
I’ve put a lot of thought into this and I think it will work.
I’d love to know: 1) The amount of covid deaths per age group for those who weren’t vaccinated. 2) The amount of un-vaxxed survivors of covid per age group. 3) How many people HAVE NOT had covid who have not been vaxxed. They make it sound if you don’t get the jab, you’ll most certainly get covid and die.
The death toll number would be much lower if HCQ and Imervectin was part of the protocol of the FDA treatment.
If I remember correctly, the 1907 vaccine law was for smallpox. At that time, smallpox was killing one out of three people.
Why are you so adamant about pushing the jab when most of us have over a 99% chance of making a full recovery from the China virus?
Do you really expect anything different from “DOUCHE-BAGDUKE”
He’s always got such a jones for getting the credit, but I doubt he wants the blame that lays in wait this time for those who will be thought responsible.
Biden claimed the vaxx as his and now he will mandate it for all.
He’s a plagiarist who claims other’s works as his own, so let him own these consequences, too.
That’s why his handlers put in in that chair … so they could do what they want to do and not get the blame.
Apparently, grumpy ol’ Grandpa Joe is good for something after all.
wjcsux wrote: “Why are you so adamant about pushing the jab when most of us have over a 99% chance of making a full recovery from the China virus?”
Yes, it was about small pox but that is mostly irrelevant. USSC set the precedent that vaccines may be mandated, not by the feds, but by the states.
I’m not pushing the jabs as much as I am pushing back about the misinformation and downright falsehoods promulgated by the anti-vaccers.
Boogieman wrote: “Lololol. Yeah, I’m sure they completed they years-long phase IV trials just like any other “approved” treatment.”
I trust Donald J Trump who set up an approval process that didn’t take 10 years, an approval process that was mostly a job program for CDC and NIH bureaucrats.
SoConPubbie wrote: “If someone, like you, who so routinely purposely ignores and avoids posted information that casts any negativity on these vaccines, why should anyone believe anything you have to say?”
I don’t ignore the falsehoods and misleading information posted by the anti-vaxxers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.