Posted on 10/04/2021 12:45:01 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
Except you and me, of course.
But I'm not all that sure about you...
Never should not have been in that sentence.
Must. Have. More. Coffee.
This is true.
I suppose divorce can become quite the battle for either aggrieved party.
He said, she said.
So. men under 3 kids or 40 years old should get crackin’ (so to speak)...
In my not-so-humble opinion, the reason there was push back on gay marriage was simply because the courts wouldn’t know which one to screw in a divorce.
Lol! That’s a clever play on words.
Thanks RACPE. The grandstanding legislator should be tied down on a table and given a vasectomy on camera, for later broadcast and straaming.
And too true. When I lived in that state on the left coast, I had a couple co-workers go through a gay divorce. I thought my own divorce was messy! YOW!
Well, at least you can claim your bias is null and void.
I saw what you did there.
from my home page
___________________________________________________________________
I’m a big tent republican.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1821435/posts?page=18455
Here’s an analogy to work with. Take a small box and fill it with some rocks. Then add some rice, filling it to the top. Now take all the same stuff, but in a different order. Put in the rice first, then add the rocks. What you’ll find is that if you put in the big stuff first, the small stuff will fit around it. But if you put in the small stuff first, the big stuff won’t have room. The republican tent is the box. The Big issues are the socon issues, to be put in first. The little issues are things that can be accommodated around the bigger stuff. A candidate who tries to focus on the smaller issues first and leave out the bigger issues has no way of getting all of us into the tent. He splits the party. The candidate who gets the big stuff right and as much of the little stuff that will fit, he can fit more into the tent. We’re often amazed at how much rice can keep fitting in. Folks such as Rudy or Romney flunk some of the big issues, and on some of the little issues it looks to me like anyone else’s rice would do just as well. All that remains for us to agree on is which are the bedrock principles and which are not. Why would there be so much invective aimed at rudy or romney from the right? Because there are some bedrock principles that he is leaving out. Bad move. I see rudybot and romneybot postings all the time saying that they would vote for Hunter or Palin, and I see socon postings that say they would not vote for rudy or romney. That’s a BIG indicator of a few bedrock principles that are being left outside the tent in order to let in some rice.
___________________________________________________________________
I try...
😁
It takes Testicular Fortitude…
Sounds like communist China where a province came up with the “three child pilicy” after their census revealed they had to make up for all the aborted female babies from the earlier Communist one-child policy mistake. Let me guess....this Democrat politician gets Chinese financing?
I was 40 when my first child was born and 49 when my fourth child was born. My vasectomy came shortly thereafter.
I’m all for giving this legislator a chopadikophomy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.