Has it been two years already?
Time flies when you're having fun,
and this place has been a lot more fun
without the riffraff.
Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
bump!
Free Republic does not and will not support RINOS!! Not now!! Not ever!!
My day after Thanksgiving message | 11/26/200 | by Jim Robinson
If you check out ARTICLES by Jim Robinson, he’s had plenty of these in the past few days — but the mittites, mittbots & mittwhits don’t seem to have much reading comprehension — or else, maybe they are feigning ignorance.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2395256/posts
Why tea party patriots should support Sarah Palin should she decide to run
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2395989/posts
My response to the RINO Blogger telling FR to Knock Off the RINO Bashing and to all RINO Pushers
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2398653/posts
Sarah Palin IS this Tea Partier's cup of Tea!!
"Over 850 freeper took part in this thread, 39 are now banned or suspended..." [from 4/21/2007 through 4/30/2007.]
"Over 850 freeper took part in this thread, 39 are now banned or suspended..." [from 4/21/2007 through 4/30/2007.]
did you ever get a hold of the feds?
Oh, my! I remember that, kind of.
There was some image that mkjessup posted
(maybe that one where a computer user bangs his head on a keyboard?)
Hilarious. LOL
What an incredible thread that I had forgotten about until searching for the Great Purge of 2007. Hillary was the presumed nominee, and we got a guy even worse than her. Rudy still was a turd, though, and a true RINO.
Oh what fun...
Here we go again...this time with Romney...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2793300/reply?c=862
:)
Something is causing me to recall the “good old days”?
I need to update this analogy for Mittens
I’m a big tent republican.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts?page=6245#6245
Here’s an analogy to work with. Take a small box and fill it with some rocks. Then add some rice, filling it to the top. Now take all the same stuff, but in a different order. Put in the rice first, then add the rocks. What you’ll find is that if you put in the big stuff first, the small stuff will fit around it. But if you put in the small stuff first, the big stuff won’t have room. The republican tent is the box. The Big issues are the socon issues, to be put in first. The little issues are things that can be accommodated around the bigger stuff. A candidate who tries to focus on the smaller issues first and leave out the bigger issues has no way of getting all of us into the tent. He splits the party. The candidate who gets the big stuff right and as much of the little stuff that will fit, he can fit more into the tent. We’re often amazed at how much rice can keep fitting in. Rudy Giuliani flunks some of the big issues, and on some of the little issues it looks to me like anyone else’s rice would do just as well. All that remains for us to agree on is which are the bedrock principles and which are not. Why would there be so much invective aimed at rudy from the right? Because there are some bedrock principles that he is leaving out. Bad move. I see rudybot postings all the time saying that they would vote for Hunter, and I see socon postings that say they would not vote for rudy. That’s a BIG indicator of a few bedrock principles that are being left outside the tent in order to let in some rice.
I’m a big tent republican.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts?page=6245#6245
Here’s an analogy to work with. Take a small box and fill it with some rocks. Then add some rice, filling it to the top. Now take all the same stuff, but in a different order. Put in the rice first, then add the rocks. What you’ll find is that if you put in the big stuff first, the small stuff will fit around it. But if you put in the small stuff first, the big stuff won’t have room. The republican tent is the box. The Big issues are the socon issues, to be put in first. The little issues are things that can be accommodated around the bigger stuff. A candidate who tries to focus on the smaller issues first and leave out the bigger issues has no way of getting all of us into the tent. He splits the party. The candidate who gets the big stuff right and as much of the little stuff that will fit, he can fit more into the tent. We’re often amazed at how much rice can keep fitting in. Folks such as Rudy or Romney flunk some of the big issues, and on some of the little issues it looks to me like anyone else’s rice would do just as well. All that remains for us to agree on is which are the bedrock principles and which are not. Why would there be so much invective aimed at rudy or romney from the right? Because there are some bedrock principles that he is leaving out. Bad move. I see rudybot and romneybot postings all the time saying that they would vote for Hunter or Palin, and I see socon postings that say they would not vote for rudy or romney. That’s a BIG indicator of a few bedrock principles that are being left outside the tent in order to let in some rice.
The thread that wouldn’t die.
Yup. We just had another mini-bugzapper thread here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2917406/posts?page=3500#3500
Ryan is a good man, but does not redeem the abortionist/homosexualist statist Romney
Aug 11, 2012 | Jim Robinson
Posted on Saturday, August 11, 2012 4:42:48 PM by Jim Robinson
The "Rudy for President" idea lives on!
President Giuliani, 2016? [Vanity]
http://www.freerepublic.com ^ | December 22, 2014 | CivilWarBrewing
Posted on Monday, December 22, 2014 12:27:27 PM by CivilWarBrewing
In the wake of recent police shootings of Brown and Garner, murder of police officers, and the overall distrust and tension fomented by DeBlasio, Sharpton, Holder, Obama, etc., primarily in New York, Giuliani has placed himself in the spotlight by speaking out against these troublemakers.
His soothing yet firm demeanor is reminiscent of Ronald Reagan and could be just what America needs following a chaotic eight years of the amateur in the White House.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: 2016; giuliani; president; rudolph; Click to Add Keyword
I realize I haven’t been here much the last few years but I do have a calendar on my iPhone. :-)
what year is this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
