Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nebraska Constitutional Carry Passes First Filibuster Hurdle
AmmoLand ^ | March 14, 2022 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 03/18/2022 4:43:48 AM PDT by marktwain

Nebraska Constitutional Carry (permitless carry) is advancing in the Nebraska Senate. On  March 11, 2022, the Senate (Nebraska is the only state with a unicameral legislature) voted for Cloture on LB 773. Cloture votes in Nebraska are required after 8 hours of debate in this stage of the legislative process, which is designated a General File.

The General File vote is considered the most difficult hurdle for a bill to overcome on the way to becoming law in Nebraska. The cloture vote needed 33 votes, or two-thirds of the senate, to proceed. There are 49 senators in the Nebraska Senate. From Omaha.com:

Nebraska law allows people to carry visible weapons in the Capitol, as Schroder did, although they cannot be taken into the legislative chamber. Concealed weapons are barred from the building.

Lawmakers adjourned without reaching a vote on LB 773, as opponents mounted a filibuster. A motion to cut off the filibuster is expected Friday morning, after about two more hours of debate. The motion needs 33 votes to succeed.

Senator Tom Brewer has been the moving force behind Constitutional Carry in the Nebraska legislature. It has been a top priority for him for the last six years.

LB 773 received 33 yes votes, then three votes were changed from no to yes, to make it 36 total yes votes.

I spoke to Senator Brewer a couple of years ago. Senator Brewer opined he had the votes to pass Constitutional Carry if he could get the bill to a floor vote. The vote on March 11 showed that Senator Brewer (R – 43)  is able to count votes. It is an important skill for a legislator.

Tony Baker, of Senator Tom Brewer’s office,

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitutionalcarry; ne; senate
If the people who voted for cloture hold the line, Nebraska will restore Constitutional Carry.
1 posted on 03/18/2022 4:43:48 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Excellent! We picked up Alabama and Ohio already this year. There’s a pretty solid chance we’ll pick up Nebraska, Georgia and Indiana too.

I think Louisiana and Florida have a good chance to pass constitutional carry next year.


2 posted on 03/18/2022 5:07:12 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Louisiana will only pass if they get a new Governor.


3 posted on 03/18/2022 5:09:55 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

They will. He’s out after this year. That’s the only holdup. They very nearly overrode his veto last year.


4 posted on 03/18/2022 5:16:54 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
...Nebraska will restore Constitutional Carry.

Kudos to you. Restore is the correct term. Our inalienable rights were compromised by enemies of our country who needed to be thrown out once they signed the unconstitutional laws.

5 posted on 03/18/2022 5:22:12 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Nebraska law allows people to carry visible weapons in the Capitol, as Schroder did, although they cannot be taken into the legislative chamber.

Any time there is any restriction at all on where and when and who can carry then you are talking about "Constitutional-ish" carry and not Constitutional carry. Let's not pretend otherwise.

6 posted on 03/18/2022 5:23:28 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
At the time of the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791, there were some places people were not allowed to carry guns.

For example: Prisons, powder magazines, and private property under the trespass laws, if the property owners forbid it.

To say any restriction at all is unconstitutional is mistaken.

7 posted on 03/18/2022 6:20:02 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

All or nothing is a foolish idea.


8 posted on 03/18/2022 6:37:15 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
All or nothing is a foolish idea.

Anything less is a misnomer. The Second Amendment places no restrictions. Placing restrictions and calling it 'Constitutional carry' is dishonest.

9 posted on 03/18/2022 6:57:21 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Crime is coming to the forefront in the political realm.the people want to defend then selves without having to go through the sheriff.


10 posted on 03/18/2022 7:44:08 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson