Biden’s Climate Czar McCarthy redefines ‘disinformation’ ...Prods big tech to crack down on dissenters

Climate Depot ^ | 6/10/2022 | Marc Morano

[norwaypinesavage]

"After years of claiming you can't challenge 'the science' they now claim you can't challenge their 'solutions!'" Gina McCarthy, President Biden's top domestic climate adviser, said tech companies should do more to prevent the spread of inaccurate information about climate change and clean energy.

The tech companies have to stop allowing specific individuals over and over again to spread disinformation."

[norwaypinesavage]

Beware, Big Sister is watching! Not only are you prohibited from challenging what she says, you can't even challenge what she does.

[Mark17]

I thought the ministry of truth, was pausing?

[eartick]

Never. Just spread out over 20 million bureaucrats.

[ronnie raygun]

Another empty head to help destroy America

[Mark17]

Never. Just spread out over 20 million bureaucrats.

Yes, I think we have had a ministry of truth, for many decades. Screw em.

[I want the USA back]

There it is, and it’s very clear. Government is telling social media to monitor thoughts and words, and social media willingly complies. Decrepit Joe doesn’t need any DGB - social media is doing the job for him.

[Not_Who_U_Think]

Truth so strong it must be protected from challenge.

Perhaps I’ve missed it, but I keep looking for evidence of human-induced warming, and I can’t find it.

[rktman]

Wonder if gina can ‘splain this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Interior_Seaway

Glowbull warming and ice melt gina? Or how about answering these for us gina:

1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.

2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.

3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.

4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.

5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.

6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.

7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.

We’ll wait............... 😵‍💫😴 🤬

[Mark17]

Perhaps I’ve missed it, but I keep looking for evidence of human-induced warming, and I can’t find it.

You never will.

[markman46]

I posted that list on linkedin one day and was call a climate denier, person never did answer the question, just said anyone who asked those questions was a denier!!! can not talk to anyone of those people

[xenia]

bkmk

[SunkenCiv]

• Op-Ed: Pay Attention to What Biden and the IRS Are Conspiring On, Because It's Big [06/11/2022]
• Biden says federal government will fund New Mexico wildfire recovery (Feds ignited this wildfire) [06/12/2022]
• Silicon Valley braces for tech pullback after a decade of decadence [06/12/2022]
• Google engineer goes public to warn firm's AI is SENTIENT after being suspended for raising the alarm: Claims it's 'like a 7 or 8-year-old' and reveals it told him shutting it off 'would be exactly like deat [06/11/2022]
• Report: Amazon's 'Wickr Me' Encrypted Chat App Is Flooded with Child Porn [06/11/2022]
• In Big Tech, Is it Discrimination to Talk About Caste Discrimination? [06/11/2022]
• Elon Musk's Starlink Makes China 'Very Scared': Space Expert [06/11/2022]

[GOPJ]

Democrats define disinformation as anything that disagrees with what they're thinking at the moment - or anything that threatens their power.

Democrats are no different than Mafia bosses... same goon/thug mentality.

[ViLaLuz]

That trained money on linkedin is a science denier.

[markman46]

Yep posted that on LinkedIn several times always same response 🙄