Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: dpetty121263
At least throw us a bone, Judge.
2 posted on
08/22/2022 7:35:34 AM PDT by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: dpetty121263
Judge Reinhart must be feeling the heat from his superiors on the circuit for having OK’d the warrant without their input.
3 posted on
08/22/2022 7:35:52 AM PDT by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: dpetty121263
Gee, now why do you suppose they want the whole thing sealed? What a joke.
4 posted on
08/22/2022 7:36:30 AM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
To: dpetty121263
So they will redact everything but “if”, “it” and such.
Reinhardt is running for the shadows.
5 posted on
08/22/2022 7:37:13 AM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
To: dpetty121263
Judge formally rejects Justice Department's plea to keep entire Trump raid affidavit sealed.Big Whoop.
The stuff that makes the DOJ look bad will still be redacted.
6 posted on
08/22/2022 7:37:20 AM PDT by
FreeReign
To: dpetty121263
He needs to allow a search the homes..and quite possibly the arrest..of everyone involved in this farce.
9 posted on
08/22/2022 7:40:55 AM PDT by
Leep
(Hillary will NEVER be president! 😁)
To: dpetty121263
To: dpetty121263
Reinhart shoulda recused on Day One.
The entire warrant and search should be IMMEDIATELY elevated to the SCOTUS as an unprecedented attack on the Presidency by a rogue agency engaged in Rebellion against Constitutional authority.
It is MEANINGLESS to say Trump is a private citizen like any other now and subject to any vindictive, politically motivated police attack on him. NONE of this would be happening were he not the President.
The entire Judiciary now risks its legitimacy because of this.
Everything else is just gorilla dust. It was an attack on the once and future President, nothing more.
15 posted on
08/22/2022 7:43:51 AM PDT by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
To: dpetty121263
I wonder if President Trump already knows what is in the affidavit. It is interesting that he has not released copies of the security videos.
16 posted on
08/22/2022 7:45:45 AM PDT by
old curmudgeon
(There is no situation so bad that the federal government can not make worse.)
To: dpetty121263
He is a Democrat judge...not a real judge.
18 posted on
08/22/2022 7:46:24 AM PDT by
rrrod
(6)
To: dpetty121263
It's a trick.
He will accept a highly redacted version.
To: dpetty121263
Unseal the whole damn thing. Like the far lefties always say, “Americans have the right to know!”
20 posted on
08/22/2022 7:47:35 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(The House is supposed to represent the people, not the friggin' Federal government. )
To: dpetty121263
21 posted on
08/22/2022 7:47:44 AM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: dpetty121263
Kabuki theater. They will keep secret the parts that we citizens actually need to see, and release scary slanted things about President Trump.
23 posted on
08/22/2022 7:48:41 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
To: dpetty121263
LIBERALS BE LIKE......
25 posted on
08/22/2022 7:49:34 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: dpetty121263
So, this magistrate won’t refuse to release all of the affidavit, but will allow the DoJ to request parts be redacated. This is all window dressing. Let’s see how much of the affidavit Epstein’s lawyer redacts.
26 posted on
08/22/2022 7:49:56 AM PDT by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: dpetty121263
The FBI is toast. Like Tony Montana says in “Scarface” “You know frog face, you just f***ed yourself”
27 posted on
08/22/2022 7:50:17 AM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
To: dpetty121263
Who decides what is redacted on the affidavit? Can the redactions be challenged? If so, how does the redactio0n challenge process work?
To: dpetty121263
This is old news already. Why do websites act as if old news is somehow new?? We knew about this last week.
31 posted on
08/22/2022 8:10:21 AM PDT by
cdnerds
(Vapingunderground)
To: dpetty121263
As per the Prez’s son-in-law on Levine last night, Rat’s want the names in the affidavit hidden, because they are the same names as the Russia, Russia Russia, and Impeachments Docs in the Raid.
32 posted on
08/22/2022 8:11:37 AM PDT by
duckman
( Not tired of winning!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson