Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA: Artemis I [3 Sept 2022, Saturday, Launch info]
NASA ^ | 09/02/22

Posted on 09/02/2022 7:30:00 AM PDT by SES1066

All eyes will be on the historic Launch Complex 39B when the Orion spacecraft and the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket lift off for the first time from NASA's modernized Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Artemis I will be the first in a series of increasingly complex missions to build a long-term human presence at the Moon for decades to come.

The primary goals for Artemis I are to demonstrate Orion’s systems in a spaceflight environment and ensure a safe re-entry, descent, splashdown, and recovery prior to the first flight with crew on Artemis II.

(Excerpt) Read more at nasa.gov ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: artemis; diversity; moon; nasa; orion; science; unmanned
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Launch window opens at 1417 EDT with weather at the normal Florida summer which means a 60% chance of launch conditions. NASA is opening its full launch feed at 1245 EDT.
1 posted on 09/02/2022 7:30:00 AM PDT by SES1066
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SES1066

They’ll spend a trillion dollars to get that first black woman on the moon


2 posted on 09/02/2022 7:33:55 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

The Artemis rocket uses four recycled Space Shuttle main engines.

Unlike the Space Shuttle, the Artemis booster throws away the engines into the ocean after launch.

How many used Space Shuttle main engines do we have in stockpile? I’m thinking maybe enough for three more Artemis launches?


3 posted on 09/02/2022 7:34:24 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Ping.


4 posted on 09/02/2022 7:39:00 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SES1066
Artemis is going in space?


5 posted on 09/02/2022 7:40:28 AM PDT by llevrok (Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
$4 billion per launch.

They claimed this would be faster and cheaper by using "proven" technology.

There's already an issue with foam I read about. So I think by "proven" they mean proven to be enormously rewarding to politically connected contractors and proven to be failures.

My estimate is two outcomes: either it doesn't launch; or it does and blows up shortly afterwards.

6 posted on 09/02/2022 7:41:49 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

Thanks. Hopefully they got the engine conditioning issue resolved.


7 posted on 09/02/2022 7:45:26 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

$40 billion to get to this point.....wow


8 posted on 09/02/2022 7:45:43 AM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardamneagle

Or was it $60 billion ?


9 posted on 09/02/2022 7:47:26 AM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

Found it....

A report from NASA’s Office of Inspector General released in November 2021 outlines just how much development costs increased for SLS between its first iteration and now, and revealed how expensive each SLS launch will be. According to the report (opens in new tab), NASA will end up spending a total of $93 billion on the Artemis program between 2012 and 2025, and each SLS/Orion launch will have a price tag of about $4.1 billion.


10 posted on 09/02/2022 7:50:32 AM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok; All

It always irritated me that the writers of the original “The Wild Wild West!” were so blithering ignorant of Greek Mythology. Artemis is the Greek Goddess of the Hunt. Yet, here is Artemis Gordon - Jim West’s sidekick! Did Gordon’s parent’s really really want a girl, or did they saddle our future hero with the “A Boy Named Sue!” life challenge?

Perhaps the show’s writers trying to tell us something else?
The implication is too horrible to contemplate!
Afterall it is Hollyweird!


11 posted on 09/02/2022 7:52:09 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
$4 billion per launch.

I did some reading, and there's 16 Shuttle-era RS-25s left, four of which are on Artemis I.

NASA has contracted Rocketdyne to build 24 more new ones.

12 posted on 09/02/2022 7:57:37 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

Obsolete equipment demonstrated by an obsolete organization.


13 posted on 09/02/2022 8:06:56 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily
The name is spelled Artemus, not Artemis, which is
the spelling for a female.
14 posted on 09/02/2022 8:08:20 AM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Hey, it’s an improvement. Shuttle was around $1B per launch back in the ‘80s; we’ve had 5X inflation since then so...a bit underpriced for this big butt white elephant!

It’ll launch a couple of times a year to great fanfare, while over at LC-39A the kidz at SpaceX will be orbiting tons of stuff with their Starship vehicle probably weekly.


15 posted on 09/02/2022 8:14:07 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wardamneagle
"Or was it $60 billion ?"

Pffft... They wasted a lot more than that on Ukraine, and handed ~$85B worth of top-of-the-line equipment to the Taliban.

A mere bag of shells.

16 posted on 09/02/2022 8:14:39 AM PDT by LIConFem (I lost my tagline in a boating accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wardamneagle

It’s all to get the first black woman on the moon nothing else


17 posted on 09/02/2022 8:24:55 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wardamneagle
60 billion and they named the project after a woman (Diana/Artemis)

Vessels are NEVER named after women unless you want tragedy and failure.

18 posted on 09/02/2022 8:26:05 AM PDT by atc23 (The Matriarchal Society we embrace has led to masks and mandates and the cult of "safety")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

They have an engine in the pipeline for after that. It’s a riff on the SSME intended to be cheaper to manufacture but not reusable.


19 posted on 09/02/2022 8:26:28 AM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

I think the later is more than likely what will happen. I hope if it is going to blow that it does before they stick astronauts on board. I fear we are looking at another Apollo 1 event.

They wasted so much money on this white elephant that could have went to a bigger spacecraft, an actual lander and better suits. There are plenty of heavy lift boosters out there that could have been made ready for human use far cheaper than this NASA jobs project.


20 posted on 09/02/2022 8:27:01 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson