Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: Enlightened1
And the b.s. rolls on, out of OUR White House, occupied by the evil ones.
To: Enlightened1
Democracy is defined as electing Democrats, any other outcome is a threat to democracy.
To: Enlightened1
Hopefully the judge stands his ground.
4 posted on
07/07/2023 10:03:29 AM PDT by
Reno89519
(DeSantis 2024. Successful Governor, Honorable Veteran, Respectful, Respected.)
To: Enlightened1
To: Enlightened1
Stolen elections have consequences.
6 posted on
07/07/2023 10:04:55 AM PDT by
Tell It Right
(1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: Enlightened1
Assuming that the stay remains, how long would it be before a verdict is reached and therefore expire the stay?
Would the stay last through the end of the year or even through the primary and general elections?
7 posted on
07/07/2023 10:07:40 AM PDT by
Tai_Chung
To: Enlightened1
“Defendants respectfully request that the Court stay its July 4 preliminary injunction pending Defendant's appeal of that order,” the government argued. “The Government faces irreparable harm with each day the injunction remains in effect, as the injunction's broad scope and ambiguous terms (including a lack of clarity with respect to what the injunction does not prohibit) may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct—including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes.” The government does not face irreparable harm. How the the government get by before social media, if so?
These people all need to permanently silenced.
8 posted on
07/07/2023 10:09:42 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Enlightened1
the attorney generals could not show harm from the censorshipHello? The harm is the invaded right of free speech.
The attorneys filing this frivolous claim ought to be sanctioned and jailed until they refile something that isn't utter legal nonsense.
Moreover their duty is not to the gubmint bureaucracy but to the people of the United States.
To: Enlightened1
It’s funny how lawmakers cannot ever find things in government to cut. The idea that government employees have jobs to censor Americans shows the utter waste of tax dollars. Face it the vast majority of lazy ass government employees do absolutely zero to improve our lives. We need to cut government spending until it hurts everyday taxpayers and then cut some more. It’s the only way people will start taking responsibility for their lives.
11 posted on
07/07/2023 10:16:46 AM PDT by
ConservativeInPA
(Delay Trump’s trial, delay. Elect Trump President. Trump pardons himself.)
To: Enlightened1
“ These immediate and ongoing harms to the Government”
Harm to this fascist government is exactly what America needs. Terminal harm.
To: Enlightened1
"We don't manipulate social media whatsoever! That is just a right wing extremist talking point!"
Followed by a request for an emergency court order to preserve the operations manipulating social media.
This government really thinks we is stoopid. Unfortunately they are by large, correct.
18 posted on
07/07/2023 10:42:23 AM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
To: Enlightened1
You cannot defeat tyrants in a court of law.
They have to be defeated by force.
To: Enlightened1
To be clear this was filed with the Judge who issued the injunction, not the Court of Appeals for the 5th circuit.
To: Enlightened1
Think of everything this requests exposes. They are DEMANDING the right to censor speech and control the internet.
21 posted on
07/07/2023 11:21:11 AM PDT by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
To: Enlightened1
defense of “democracy” as trumping American citizens’ constitutionally protected rights.You could further defend democracy by cancelling the 2024 elections and removing the threat to democracy posed by giving people a choice as to who their elected officals are. [brain going into lockup from the cognative dissonance of writing that sentence].
To: Enlightened1
If the govermedia's language usage were a picture:
To: Enlightened1
So we went from the government saying they don’t do this to them now filing for protection to do it.
How much more corrupt can it get.
24 posted on
07/07/2023 11:30:02 AM PDT by
Revel
To: Enlightened1
So much news to censor, the Biden Administration doesn’t want any more cats out of the bag for the public to see.
CONTROL that speech Joey B.
While you can.
25 posted on
07/07/2023 11:41:18 AM PDT by
Candor7
(( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!)<img src=""width=500></img>)
To: Enlightened1
In the emergency stay, the government contended that the injunction was vague and that the attorney generals could not show harm from the censorship, an argument that Judge Terry Doughty had rejected multiple times in the past. Sounds like fear to me.
26 posted on
07/07/2023 11:43:40 AM PDT by
Allegra
(Stop the Zeepers from Censoring FReepers)
To: Enlightened1
You know, they say they’re fighting mis-information. But yet you can go on social media and find ALL SORTS of posts about the Earth being flat.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson