[Macho MAGA Man]

What an excellent rebuttal. This is a historical one for the ages. Read it all.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Page 1. It is a thing of beauty.

[Yo-Yo]

[RetiredTexasVet]

In fact, Trump should be requesting sanctions against Smith for leaking and a gag order against him.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

No standing.

[ClearCase_guy]

bfl

[joshua c]

the attorneys will be indicted

for defending their client

the nerve

[KobraKai]

The judge won’t even read it, probably deny it outright.

[sauropod]

Downloaded it. Gonna have to read it.

[Steely Tom]

Wow, terrific writing and research in the Motion.

I hope the judge follows its reasoning.

[JesusIsLord]

Facts, law, rebuttals and eloquence don't mean much to a bias politicized court/judge.

Who is the judge who will decide on Trump's rebuttal motion?

[OHPatriot]

OUTSTANDING!!

What are the odds the Gag Order is Upheld?

Sadly not a bet I want to make.

[Bullish]

I wonder if the judge will even bother to read this before they side with the govt?

[Mr. K]

"If the prosecution wishes to avoid criticism for abusing its power, the solution is simple: stop abusing its power. The Constitution allows no alternative."

That's a good one.

[Vaduz]

Indeed it must be a jaw dropper for Jack Smith his world court law juggling not sticking.

[isthisnickcool]

I read it all, it looks like something Tony Buzbee would write....