Posted on 11/30/2023 7:23:58 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
Confidence in our judiciary? Where? I can’t see it! Our Judges are the fruit of our universities and law schools.
At this point, the ballots have been separated from the envelopes for a long time. At best, you could identify signatures on the ballots that don’t match, and you would get a number of ballots that should not have been counted in the first place.
If that number is large enough, it could call the election into question, even though you would not know who they voted for.
You don't have to make the case to me, I'm all for it. The government argued otherwise, and the judge sided with the government. My argument is the government argued the way that it did because it never expects to be on the other side of this problem. If you never expect to be held to the rules that you're imposing on others, you'll never worry about how fair the rules are.
Since when does a "judges" opinion, override the law or statutes. Oh, that's right, he is a lefty, so, he can do that.
There is a doctrine in law called Spoliation of Evidence. If a party hides, destroys or otherwise makes evidence unavailable, the trier of fact may presume that the evidence would not be favorable to the party hiding it. Unfortunately, that does not apply if the court approves hiding the evidence.
p
That’s what I’m seeing.
Reminds Me of the Reeses Peanut Butter Cups:
You got your chocolate in My Peanut Butter.
You got your Peanut Butter on My chocolate.
Why do the demonratcommieblmantifaterrorscumfeminazipedophilegoatrapers think We are that stupid ?
The judge is saying yes, there’s fraud, but we’ve got to keep it hidden.
So you pretty much dig the way the deep state deflects and runs out the clock? Good grief!
But that is not the case. These are signatures on the envelopes.The ballots are not seen so you would not know who they voted for.
There’s a tree or a saguaro in Arizona that’s missing its punk judge.
Not letting Kari Lakes legal team “would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process.” I don’t ,can’t and won’t trust another election again.
I wouldn’t be surprised that those voting machines had a plug-in module that could be programmed to alter the ballot counts. These modules could be programmed in advance to flip Republican entries to Democrat. All would be necessary would be to plug in those modules after they were programmed. Afterwards, the modules would be removed so no one would know they existed.
They all know it and they are playing games the damage they agreed to is done.
“is the judge saying preserving election integrity is more important than proving election fraud?”
No. He’s saying that perpetuating a lie, and protecting criminals, is more important than proving election fraud.
The judge is saying he’s Deep State.
“Wait, if this proved things were correct, wouldn’t that prove the election was legit? The ruling suggests the judge knows it was stolen.“
Exactly. The Judge already knows it was stolen, just like 2020. They just don’t want confirmation because it might snowball into checking other things. ‘Election integrity’ means hiding the election cheating to give the public confidence.
Judges who deny justice have a corrosive effect on the judiciary.
MARCH 16, 2021, 12:58 PM CDT
An Arizona judge has ordered the Arizona Republican Party and its lawyers to pay more than $18,000 in attorney fees for filing a “groundless” lawsuit seeking a hand count audit of votes in the 2020 presidential election that differed from the method established by the secretary of state.
Judge John Hannah Jr. of Maricopa County, Arizona, said he had no power to order a new audit method. The court “is not a roving commission to declare the law and order people to follow it,” Hannah said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.