Posted on 01/11/2024 7:51:11 AM PST by marcusmaximus
How many times has Biden read from his teleprompter, “giving Ukraine this then that then the other would mean WWIII!”, and then goes ahead and does it anyway?
I think Russia threatening to start using nuclear weapons in its European invasions is worth posting to FR and reading about.
Russia’s much-hyped pre-election winter offensive is flopping in the Donetsk region so it’s time for the expected nuke threats as a distraction as always.
I don’t understand what the problem is since those Ruzzian missiles aren’t going to work anyway.
The Putin is angry.
————
Of course he is. The Ukies used US cluster munitions on Belgorod city center a few days ago…..thank Vlad for being lenient.
Instead of nukes, etc, he unleashed the largest most devastating three day missile attack all across Ukraine, from Lvov, to Kiev, to Kherson….last one in daylight ( he clobbered the Ukie weapons depots and workers) ,of course the Ukies said they shot down 250 of the 150 he launched……however, widespread recorded daylight video of the massive explosions say different.
Of particular interest is the Hotel he destroyed with NATO ( Poles, Lithuanians) members….Vlad has very, very good intel…..rumored to be discussing where to put the welfare F-16’s….right on the Romanian border, US and NATO teams to do all the maintenance in Romania…just across the border….to bad for Romania.
The Russians and CIA struck a deal before this war began that included certain redlines. One of those redlines was that Ukraine wouldn't strike Russian territory with long-range weapons.
But, morons like you want nothing but escalation.
LOL, you made up that silly post.
Really Kazan, that was lame, of course, you threw in the name-calling.
Tell your buddies east of the Dnipro that if they light one off, Russia will cease to exist as a political entity.
Every week or so the drunkard Medvedev threatens to nuke someone, somewhere.
“The Putin is angry. Maybe NATO shouldn’t shoot missiles at Moscow?”
Another lie from FR’s resident liar.
Come on, Frick; post a link to your evidence that NATO — and I mean ANY NATO country — has fired missiles at Moscow.
The Russians have never been the problem in this war. THE BIDEN REGIME and neocon nit wits have.
It's out meddling in Ukraine and our constant efforts to thwart a peaceful resolution to what has been going on in Ukraine that has been the problem>
WE fomented an illegal coup in Ukraine. We installed a puppet Ukrainian nationalists government that tried to exterminate the ethnic Russian population in eastern Ukraine. We funded and trained the Ukrainian army. We armed Ukraine with lethal weapons. We were running biolabs with deadly pathogens in them in Ukraine>
If Russia or China had done that in Mexico, we would have, justifiably, invaded.
The Russians tried to prevent war with the Minsk Accords, before the war began in 12/21 by coming to us with their security concerns and in Turkey in March of 2022 when peace deal was nearly reached before we and Boris Johnson killed.
The Biden regime wanted this proxy war. And, now we're closer to a hot war with Russia, WW III and nuclear war.
And, if you are okay with all that, you're dangerous numbskull.
how are they going to be in charge? You can pay people to kill for you, but you can’t pay people to die for you.
All the elites will be gobbled up by the men that protect them or the men that built their bunkers. Hahhahaha Bezos, Zuckerberg, senators or bureaucrats think that they’ll survive the zombie apocalypse ? Not likely. Who is going to repair and fuel their planes, grow their food, fix the plumbing hahahaahhaha.
all those elite bunkers are a place where the mob KNOWS has supplies and food. Even on an island, jungle or wherever…… they’ll be the first to go after the cities devour themselves. If they survive the first wave by of destruction, anyone with family members killed or maimed will want payback. Only wish they’d televise it so I could see their faces when the worm turns and their little utopian dream crumbles.
Let me repeat for the learning disabled in the U.S. National Security community — Putin has two objectives. First, demilitarize Ukraine. That is taking place through attrition and, as an unexpected benefit, he also is demilitarizing NATO, who is unable to produce air defense missiles and artillery shells that Ukraine would need to mount a credible defense. Second, de-nazify Ukraine. Putin and his Generals are not going to stop until the filth of Nazi scum prevalent in Ukrainian ranks are wiped away. Real clear. Real simple. Don’t make this more complicated than it is.
This is the problem. The so-called foreign policy experts that populate think tanks and Congressional committees in Washington, DC do not know a damn thing about Russia. They are obsessed with a 1980s vision of Russia and are refusing to take a fresh look at Russia as a nation, as an industrial power and as a legitimate military force. These dummies do not realize that if Putin suddenly disappears that Russia is not going to crumple into a fetal position and beg for the West to love it. Ain’t going to happen. Russia understands one thing that the United States does not — it will defend the motherland at any cost. Russians are proud of their country and its history. It has rejected the legacy of the Soviet era and embraced Orthodox Christianity. The United States? Its borders are being flooded with a tsunami of migrants, its major cities are filled with homeless drug addicts and crime, its politicians are busy enriching themselves at the expense of their countrymen and the government is promoting and protecting sexual deviance.
Russians, unlike Americans, understand science and know that men cannot have babies and that women cannot grow a penis. It is this grasp on reality that gives Russia the confidence that it will prevail in preventing the West from turning Ukraine into Jeffrey Epstein land.
The article says nothing at all about any strike against Russia’s nuclear missile sites; it just mentions any strike against missile launch sites inside Russia; which would seem to include any non-nuclear missiles launched from inside Russia against Ukraine by Russia.
In other words, Medvedev seems to be threatening the use of nukes — again! — for any action by Ukraine — or anyone — against ANY Russian site that can launch a missile of any type.
So, either the article is filled with sloppy writing — a possibility — or Medvedev is in the bottle again.
The article said nothing about limiting the sites to “ICBM sites.” In fact, the descriptor “ICBM” is nowhere to be found in the article.
why would I post anything to you, a man who compared The Zelensky with a young Winston Churchill? Are you sure you didn’t mean Ward Churchill?
Not likely
You and I know that.
They apparently don’t.
Even The Roman Republican Guard got tired of protecting certain Caesars after a while................
You aren’t stupid and you know how you twisted it. LOL What a character.
bullSchiff,
your usual
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.