Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/12/2024 11:15:31 AM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


2 posted on 01/12/2024 11:15:42 AM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

the obvious answer is DON’T EAT FOOD! it will kill you. bugs are better so eat ze bugs!


4 posted on 01/12/2024 11:18:04 AM PST by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Strangely they seem to have found the most plastics in several organic products.


5 posted on 01/12/2024 11:19:05 AM PST by angry elephant (Been with Trump since huge 2016 Washington state rally in May.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
nanoplastics

The latest bogeyman, in front of which we are all required to cower in abject fear ...

6 posted on 01/12/2024 11:20:11 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

It says American stores, it should say U.S. stores


7 posted on 01/12/2024 11:20:22 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Soy, it’s in everything....................


8 posted on 01/12/2024 11:20:57 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
In the latest report, Consumer Reports

BWHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Wait ... you're serious???

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!

10 posted on 01/12/2024 11:21:27 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

“whether it is related to a mystery spike in cancers among young people.”

Makes me wonder when said spike in cancers started. The chemicals they refer to have been around for many years, with plasticizers like BPA actually being outlawed in recent years. If the cancer spike is recent it would be hard to draw that correlation. It would make more sense if there were talking about a steady increase over decades.


11 posted on 01/12/2024 11:21:44 AM PST by Flying Circus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt; nickcarraway; ransomnote; Jane Long

Then again maybe it’s just the CoupFlu vaxxes...

Check out endocrine system issues after CoupFlu vaccination.


14 posted on 01/12/2024 11:29:06 AM PST by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

15 posted on 01/12/2024 11:31:26 AM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

“The product with the highest amount of phthalates per serving in nanograms was Annie’s canned organic cheesy ravioli, which contained 53,580 nanograms of phthalates per serving. . . . the CDC says that between 2 and 20 nanograms per milliliter of blood can cause people adverse health problems.”

The average adult supposedly has somewhere around 5000 ml of blood, so one serving of that ravioli would give you about 10.7 ng per ml.

I wonder if the phthalates are coming from the lining of the can.


16 posted on 01/12/2024 11:35:32 AM PST by buridan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Annie’s canned organic cheesy ravioli, which contained 53,580 nanograms of phthalates per serving.

A can is 15 oz and it says 2 servings per can.

So that’s 53,580 nanograms per 7.5 oz or 222 milliliters.

53,580 ÷ 222 ml = 241 nanoparticles per ml

The CDC says that between 2 and 20 nanograms per milliliter of blood can cause people adverse health problems.

Problem is they don’t state how many nanoparticles per nanogram.


18 posted on 01/12/2024 11:43:08 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Next, check the fine print below the ingredients in your regular Vanilla CoffeeMate.

(It now contains Bio-engineered substances...)


21 posted on 01/12/2024 11:46:59 AM PST by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Pick up any item on the center aisle of a grocery store and then read the ingredients. Next, convince me all the chemicals can be good for me.


22 posted on 01/12/2024 11:48:08 AM PST by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Note to self: Throw away all the cans of Annie’s organic cheesy ravioli.


23 posted on 01/12/2024 11:49:41 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Here’s a great site that goes into detail about these chemicals. The people who run the site have connection with a lab, they have all kinds of foods and other products tested for these “forever” chemicals. They add content as they test more items. people should not be put off by the word “Eco” which I also dislike. This is a very informative and useful site.
It makes sense to avoid toxic chemicals as much as one reasonably can. For decades I have bought only ingredients, very rarely “store bought” food. I will re-considerbuying pasta. One option for pasta is using pasta made in Italy.

https://www.mamavation.com/

ECO-WELLNESS PRODUCT INVESTIGATIONS FOR MOMS
If it’s toxic, we’ll find it, and put it on the naughty list!


25 posted on 01/12/2024 11:54:41 AM PST by little jeremiah (Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
"It comes amid growing fears about the massive amounts of chemicals being ingested by Americans every year - and whether it is related to a mystery spike in cancers among young people"

I think I am seeing a redirect...
28 posted on 01/12/2024 12:11:33 PM PST by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Not to mention gender dystopia.


31 posted on 01/12/2024 12:17:21 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

EEEK! Not only that the water in most places has been found to be contaminated with dihydrogenmonoxide.


38 posted on 01/12/2024 12:57:18 PM PST by FrozenAssets (You don't have to be crazy to live here, but it helps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
Wading through the horse feces I found this.
In 1946, DuPont introduced nonstick cookware coated with Teflon. Today the family of fluorinated chemicals that sprang from Teflon includes thousands of nonstick, stain-repellent and waterproof compounds called PFAS, short for per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances.
Then it said that nanoplastics were found in water bottles.   The didn't claim that the sky was falling so at least that was a blessing.
The researchers tried to make their sample size as broad as possible - testing water, soda, cereal, bread, meat, fish, condiments, desserts and even baby food.
The better to scare you with my dear.
39 posted on 01/12/2024 12:59:04 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson