Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden Administration Could Limit Bank Overdraft Fees To As Little As $3—Here’s Why
Forbes via MSN ^ | 01/18/2024 | Ana Faguy

Posted on 01/18/2024 8:25:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is pushing to reduce the overdraft fees Americans are charged at banks and credit unions when they don’t have enough money in their accounts to cover spending, which could save customers $3.5 billion a year, the latest in a string of crackdowns on fees by the Biden Administration.

Key Facts

Under a new proposed rule, large financial institutions could either charge a flat fee for overdraft payments that aligns with the service’s cost, or provide the same disclosures and protections for overdraft services that are required for credit cards and other loans.

If banks choose the flat fee option, that fee would be based on an established benchmark, the CFPB said, noting the agency still has to decide which benchmark—$3, $6, $7 or $14—it thinks is the appropriate amount.

The new rule would apply to institutions with more than $10 billion in assets—which includes some 175 banks and credit unions in the U.S, according to the CFPB.

The agency says the rule would close a loophole that has exempted overdraft loans from consumer protections required by the Truth in Lending Act.

Overdraft loans initially got “special treatment” to make it “easier for banks to cover paper checks” often sent through the mail, CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said, adding that the banks have turned overdrafts into a “massive junk free harvesting machine.”

The CFPB also noted overdraft fees are often $35, even though most consumers’ debit card overdrafts are for less than $26 and are repaid within three days.

Big Number

23 million. That’s approximately how many U.S. households pay overdraft fees a year, the CFPB said. If the proposed rule comes to fruition, consumers could save $3.5 billion a year or $150 per household that pays overdraft fees, the independent watchdog agency said.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banks; fees; overdraft; regulations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

What To Watch For

The CFPB said they expect the proposed rule to be finalized this year and go into effect in October 2025.
1 posted on 01/18/2024 8:25:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

it’s cutting into his 10%.

why wouldn’t he do this?


2 posted on 01/18/2024 8:26:57 AM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Eliminate the unconstitutional CFPB!


3 posted on 01/18/2024 8:27:50 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nothing like getting rich off of irresponsible and poor people.
Same for CC rates on a missed payment.


4 posted on 01/18/2024 8:30:00 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In re:

"Under a new proposed rule, large financial institutions could either charge a flat fee for overdraft payments that aligns with the service’s cost, or provide the same disclosures and protections for overdraft services that are required for credit cards and other loans......" "If banks choose the flat fee option, that fee would be based on an established benchmark, the CFPB said, noting the agency still has to decide which benchmark—$3, $6, $7 or $14—it thinks is the appropriate amount." "The new rule would apply to institutions with more than $10 billion in assets—which includes some 175 banks and credit unions in the U.S, according to the CFPB."

Let's be very clear here "democracy" is nowhere involved in any of this. The CFPB is a rouge agency and should be abolished. If Congress wants to pass particular indiviudal "consumer financial protection" measures it is capable of doing so. With Elizabeth Warren's brainchild we got another deep state detactorship that, rouge as it is, is not even accountable to Congress, not even for its budget (it merely draws directly from an account at the Federal Reserve).

5 posted on 01/18/2024 8:35:32 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Won’t do me much good.

I’ve never paid one.


6 posted on 01/18/2024 8:36:57 AM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Unconstitutional. Period.


7 posted on 01/18/2024 8:39:04 AM PST by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As much as I’d like to see this go into effect, it isn’t the purview of the US Government to dictate what fees/charges should be limited in a free commerce society. AFAIC there’s nothing in the US Constitution that supports this obvious vote pandering scheme.


8 posted on 01/18/2024 8:39:05 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova

What? You mean you keep track of your money and don’t spend more than you have? That’s a bizarre concept.


9 posted on 01/18/2024 8:39:41 AM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It would appear that any effort by Government to save it’s citizens money, would be done to then extract those saving from them through additional or increases in taxes.

Color me suspicious of those efforts. Government needs to shut up sit down and get out of the way and only do what article one section eight says they are authorized. The large group of layabouts in the US Congress need to join the Freedom Caucus and cease their treasonous efforts to destroy the country.


10 posted on 01/18/2024 8:39:56 AM PST by wita (Under oath since 1966 in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

If it weren’t for irresponsible poor people, we wouldn’t have state lotteries.


11 posted on 01/18/2024 8:41:14 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Three dollar payday loans!

Automatically approved! No application necessary!

That’ll be popular, I bet!


12 posted on 01/18/2024 8:41:30 AM PST by Tom in SFCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin

“That’s a bizarre concept.”

And racist too!


13 posted on 01/18/2024 8:42:36 AM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Biden isn’t doing anything other than soiling his depends. His handlers realize the economy is not good for the middle class and below. So, they dramatize this little offering, trying to reinforce what the morons in the public want believe, that the Dems are for “the little guy”.


14 posted on 01/18/2024 8:42:43 AM PST by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

If they lower these fees, then there will be other fees and costs to other consumers that use their accounts responsibly. There are certain operating expenses and profit motives that will still be there. Likely the era of “free checking” will be over. The people that overdraft and pay late are funding the people that don’t.


15 posted on 01/18/2024 8:43:18 AM PST by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: moovova

It will actually hurt you because they will find other ways of making money and those not paying the fees now, will pay other fees.


16 posted on 01/18/2024 8:44:31 AM PST by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: moovova

And un-American, at least where the government is concerned.


17 posted on 01/18/2024 8:44:32 AM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Chump change.

If Biden really wants to help Americans avoid excessive fees, he could turn to the IRS and how they gouge the consumer.

Google tells me....

The maximum total penalty for failure to file and pay is 47.5% (22.5% late filing and 25% late payment) of the tax. If your return was over 60 days late, the minimum failure-to-file penalty is the smaller of $485 (for tax returns required to be filed in 2024) or 100% of the tax required to be shown on the return.


18 posted on 01/18/2024 8:45:00 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Americans bounce A LOT of checks.

Particularly the indebted, dependent, welfare types who Dems think are their constituency.


19 posted on 01/18/2024 8:47:34 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnut

Without a doubt.


20 posted on 01/18/2024 8:48:49 AM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson