Posted on 01/19/2024 11:30:57 AM PST by ShadowAce
IBM Consulting this week told its US-based executives and people managers that, effective immediately, they must work from a corporate office at least three days per week, or face the consequences.
John Granger, SVP of IBM Consulting, told staff in an email this is a company-wide policy that extends beyond the Consulting division. He issued a similar, if less emphatic, memo in 2022 that called for being in the workplace three days per week, "wherever possible," and exempted those designated as "work-at-home" employees from the office or client-site attendance.
The email sent this week, however, tells those affected that they should "separate from IBM" if they don't wish to comply.
IBM Software issued a similar directive in September 2023, and at the time, we're told, the Consulting group expected to implement the policy at a later date. That day has now arrived.
Big Blue's antipathy toward remote work predates the workplace exodus precipitated by the COVID pandemic. Back in 2017, IBM tried to end telecommuting by telling workers they had to work from one of six strategic offices, a policy some employees saw as an attempt to drive older workers out.
An IBM employee who spoke with The Register, and asked not to be named for fear of retaliation, described the enforced return-to-office policy as "attrition by design," noting that the IT giant would have to spend some money to relocate and promote lower-band (younger) employees but would save money overall by shedding more experienced, more expensive workers.
Our source also noted that Big Blue is ordering people back to the office at a time when the venerable employer is closing regional hubs.
"Winning in the marketplace demands our collective focus and alignment on innovation, speed, and execution," Granger's note states. "We believe alignment includes face-to-face interaction as it drives the engagement, productivity, and the culture we need to bring world-class client services and products to market."
That belief about productivity may be misplaced. According to economic research published earlier this week by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, remote work has no significant effect on productivity.
"After controlling for pre-pandemic trends in industry productivity growth rates, we find little statistical relationship between telework and pandemic productivity performance," the study says.
"We conclude that the shift to remote work, on its own, is unlikely to be a major factor explaining differences across sectors in productivity performance. By extension, despite the important social and cultural effects of increased telework, the shift is unlikely to be a major factor explaining changes in aggregate productivity."
Part of the problem for managers is that many lack ways to assess the productivity of remote workers.
They also lack a way to assess office occupancy. According to our IBM source, Big Blue's team can tell when employees arrive by the time they swipe their badges through building security systems. But there's no badge swipe upon exit, so there's nothing to prevent workers from showing up and then departing shortly thereafter.
Be that as it may, IBM Consulting is moving ahead with its plan, requiring executives and people managers to "immediately begin working from a client location or an IBM office" at least three days each week, unless eligible for exceptions like medical conditions or military service.
Those who are currently not working from an office or client site must relocate by August 1 so that they can work on-prem, or to shift to a related role outside IBM Consulting for a position that's approved for remote work, or to simply leave the biz.
Granger's note, also shared here on social media, says executives and people managers who will be required to relocate will be informed of this by the end of January 2024, and will then have 30 days to decide if they are willing to make the move.
It's perhaps worth noting that insiders sometimes say IBM stands for I've Been Moved.
Asked to comment, an IBM spokesperson told The Register, "IBM is focused on providing a work environment that balances flexibility with the face to face interactions that make us more productive, innovative and better able to serve our clients. Consistent with that approach, we’re requiring executives and people managers in the United States to be in the office at least three days per week."
Those affected by the policy appear to be less enthusiastic. In a post to LinkedIn, Tony Moura, IBM Federal Garage Lead, said, "So, I'll drive to an office that's 30 minutes away, incur the cost for tolls which will equal $11.25 for the day, and lunch. Just to sit with no one that is on my team because they're all over the country to simply do what I'm doing right now." ®
Employee: Can I come to work in my flip flops, shorts and beach shirt? And can I use my same padded heel rest on the desk top when I recline?
Boss: Well, as you are a vice president we’ll think about it.
Late last summer they ordered everybody back to work, either at home base or the nearest satellite office, including folks they formerly told could work remotely and who had moved in the interim.
A bunch of long timers with decades of knowledge left or retired. The ones who were too far from even a satellite quit and got new jobs. Productivity went into the tank (which proved lucrative for me as having to come in and fix things now gives me much more leverage on the price tag).
Long story short, they've cancelled the second and third waves of return to work they had planned, and have even had to close some of the satellites due to operating expenses of trying to keep them open.
For those that returned already, it's gone from 5 days a week required to 3, and now to 2.
But the damage is already done. The smart folks are leaving or retiring, and I'm not at all impressed with the millennial and Gen Z types whose messes I'm cleaning up after now. (but thanks for the new boat!)
Not worth the paper they aren't printed on.
Almost universally.They can be useful if you need monkeys to do rote work.
If IT hates you, the end user likes you.
wrong color to be the IBM DEI Manager...must be the IBM ESG manager
I find quite a number of online courses that work well for those who are interested in the subject.
The classic examples would be to watch you-tube lessons from Richard Feynman or Milton Friedman.
That’s often the case.
“research published earlier this week by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, remote work has no significant effect on productivity.”
Managers of the CRE portfolio at Blackstone were not available for comment.
When I was in the office, sitting in my little half-cubicle, listening to my co-workers yell to their speakerphones in a meeting, interrupting everyone else, losing my concentration, etc--I was STILL working remotely.
My job consists of building, securing, and maintaining servers in a datacenter. Those datacenters were no on the same floor as I was. Most of them weren't even in the same building.
The only difference between then and now as far as my job goes, is I no longer have to commute in one of the world's worst traffic cities, and I'm saving some wear and tear on my vehicles.
Some jobs are telecommuting whether you're in the office or not.
Corporate started it with covid to it’s their own fault.
“Not at IBM.
There are no placeholders at IBM on their design team.”
That’s what placeholder think.
“Working from home is not as efficient and productivity suffers.”
That’s not what the numbers say.
My experience too. We had office all over the planet and few people were at my location.
“That’s not what the numbers say.”
“The numbers” can be fudged to say whatever the statistician wants them to say. Always.
“I don’t care what any of these telecommuting workers say. They do not work as much at home as they would have to actually at a workplace, period.”
BS, period. Study after study showed a remarkable improvement to productivity.
I had a few people tell me early on that the world would never go back to forcing people into the office. I told each of them that as soon as companies realized they could RIF people without needing to follow WARN guidelines simply by mandating return to workplace requirements, we’d see a change. Once the economy turned and the Dems could no longer count on woke companies to fraudulently prop up their workforce, they’d use this ruse to lay people off. IBM was an early innovator in remote work...sad to see how far they’ve fallen.
Same number used inhouse and for telecommuting.
I just don’t believe it. The studies are biased
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.