Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE MARKS OF THE NEW BIRTH
Rnmomof7 | 9/5/01 | John Wesley

Posted on 09/05/2001 2:47:45 PM PDT by RnMomof7

THE MARKS OF THE NEW BIRTH

"So is every one that is born of the Spirit." John 3:8.

1. How is every one that is "born of the Spirit," -- that is, born again, -- born of God? What is meant by the being born again, the being born of God, or being born of the Spirit? What is implied in the being a son or a child of God, or having the Spirit of adoption? That these privileges, by the free mercy of God, are ordinarily annexed to baptism (which is thence termed by our Lord in a preceding verse, the being "born of water and of the Spirit") we know; but we would know what these privileges are: What is the new birth?

2. Perhaps it is not needful to give a definition of this, seeing the Scripture gives none. But as the question is of the deepest concern to every child of man; since, "except a man be born again," born of the Spirit, "he cannot see the kingdom of God;" I propose to lay down the marks of it in the plainest manner, just as I find them laid down in Scripture.

I. 1. The First of these, and the foundation of all the rest, is faith. So St. Paul, "Ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus." (Gal. 3:26.) So St. John, "To them gave he power" (_exousian_, right or privilege, it might rather be translated) "to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name; which were born," when they believed, "not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh," not by natural generation, "nor of the will of man," like those children adopted by men, in whom no inward change is thereby wrought, "but of God." (John 1:12,13.) And again in his General Epistle, "Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God." (1 John 5:1.)

2. But it is not a barely notional or speculative faith that is here spoken of by the Apostles. It is not a bare assent to this proposition, Jesus is the Christ; nor indeed to all the propositions contained in our creed, or in the Old and New Testament. It is not merely an assent to any or all these credible things, as credible. To say this, were to say (which who could hear?) that the devils were born of God; for they have this faith. They, trembling, believe, both that Jesus is the Christ, and that all Scripture, having been given by inspiration of God, is true as God is true. It is not only an assent to divine truth, upon the testimony of God, or upon the evidence of miracles; for they also heard the words of his mouth, and knew him to be a faithful and true witness. They could not but receive the testimony he gave, both of himself, and of the Father which sent him. They saw likewise the mighty works which he did, and thence believed that he "came forth from God." Yet, nevertheless this faith, they are still "reserved in chains of darkness unto the judgment of the great day."

3. For all this is no more than a dead faith. The true, living, Christian faith, which whosoever hath, is born of God, is not only an assent, an act of the understanding; but a disposition, which God hath wrought in his heart; "a sure trust and confidence in God, that, through the merits of Christ, his sins are forgiven, and he reconciled to the favor of God." This implies, that a man first renounce himself; that, in order to be "found in Christ," to be accepted through him, he totally rejects all "confidence in the flesh;" that, "having nothing to pay," having no trust in his own works or righteousness of any kind, he comes to God as a lost, miserable, self-destroyed, self-condemned, undone, helpless sinner; as one whose mouth is utterly stopped, and who is altogether "guilty before God." Such a sense of sin, (commonly called despair, by those who speak evil of the things they know not,) together with a full conviction, such as no words can express, that of Christ only cometh our salvation, and an earnest desire of that salvation, must precede a living faith, a trust in Him, who "for us paid our ransom by his death, and fulfilled the law of his life." This faith then, whereby we are born of God, is "not only a belief of all the articles of our faith, but also a true confidence of the mercy of God, through our Lord Jesus Christ."

4. An immediate and constant fruit of this faith whereby we are born of God, a fruit which can in no wise be separated from it, no, not for an hour, is power over sin; -- power over outward sin of every kind; over every evil word and work; for wheresoever the blood of Christ is thus applied, it "purgeth the conscience from dead works;" -- and over inward sin; for it purifieth the heart from every unholy desire and temper. This fruit of faith St. Paul has largely described, in the sixth chapter of his Epistle to the Romans. "How shall we," saith he, "who" by faith "are dead to sin, live any longer therein?"Our old man is crucified with Christ, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin." -- "Likewise, reckon ye yourselves to be dead unto sin, but alive unto God, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Let not sin therefore reign" even "in your mortal body,"but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead."For sin shall not have dominion over you. -- God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, -- but being made free," -- the plain meaning is, God be thanked that though ye were, in time past, the servants of sin, yet now -- "being free from sin, ye are become the servants of righteousness."

5. The same invaluable privilege of the sons of God is as strongly asserted by St. John; particularly with regard to the former branch of it, namely, power over outward sin. After he had been crying out, as one astonished at the depth of the riches of the goodness of God, -- "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God! Beloved, now are we the sons of God: And it doth not yet appear what we shall be; but we know, that when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is;" (1 John 3:1, etc..) -- he soon adds, "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: And he cannot sin, because he is born of God." (1 John 3:9.) But some men will say, "True: Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin habitually." Habitually! Whence is that? I read it not. It is not written in the Book. God plainly saith, "He doth not commit sin;" and thou addest, habitually! Who art thou that mendest the oracles of God? -- that "addest to the words of this book?" Beware, I beseech thee, lest God "add to thee all the plagues that are written therein!" especially when the comment thou addest is such as quite swallows up the text: So that by this _methodeia planEs_, artful method of deceiving, the precious promise is utterly lost; by this _kybeia anthrOpOn_, tricking and shuffling of men, the word of God is made of none effect. O beware, thou that thus takest from the words of this book, that, taking away the whole meaning and spirit from them, leavest only what may indeed be termed a dead letter, lest God take away thy part out of the book of life!

6. Suffer we the Apostle to interpret his own words, by the whole tenor of his discourse. In the fifth verse of this chapter, he had said, "Ye know that he," Christ, "was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin." What is the inference he draws from this? "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not. Whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him." (1 John 3:6.) To his enforcement of this important doctrine, he premises an highly necessary caution: "Little children, let no man deceive you;" (1 John 3:7;) for many will endeavor so to do; to persuade you that you may be unrighteous, that you may commit sin, and yet be children of God! "He that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as He is righteous. He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning." Then follows, "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: And he cannot sin, because he is born of God. In this," adds the Apostle, "the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil." By this plain mark (the committing or not committing sin) are they distinguished from each other. To the same effect are those words in his fifth chapter, "We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not." (1 John 3:18.)

7. Another fruit of this living faith is peace. For, "being justified by faith," having all our sins blotted out, "we have peace with God, through our Lord Jesus Christ." (Rom. 5:1.) This indeed our Lord himself, the night before his death, solemnly bequeathed to all his followers: "Peace," saith he, "I leave with you;" (you who "believe in God," and "believe also in me;") "my peace I give unto you:"Not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." (John 14:27.) And again, "These things have I spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace." (John 16:33.) This is that "peace of God which passeth all understanding," that serenity of soul which it hath not entered into the heart of a natural man to conceive, and which it is not possible for even the spiritual man to utter. And it is a peace which all the powers of earth and hell are unable to take from him. Waves and storms beat upon it, but they shake it not; for it is founded upon a rock. It keepeth the hearts and minds of the children of God, at all times and in all places. Whether they are in ease or in pain, in sickness or health, in abundance or want, they are happy in God. In every state they have learned to be content, yea, to give thanks unto God through Christ Jesus; being well assured that "whatever is, is best," because it is His will concerning them: So that in all the vicissitudes of life their "heart standeth fast, believing in the Lord."

II. 1. A Second scriptural mark of those who are born of God, is hope. Thus St. Peter, speaking to all the children of God who were then scattered abroad, saith, "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which, according to his abundant mercy, hath begotten us again unto a lively hope." (1 Peter 1:3.) _elpida zOsan_, a lively or living hope, saith the Apostle; because there is also a dead hope, as well as a dead faith; a hope which is not from God, but from the enemy of God and man; -- as evidently appears by its fruits; for, as it is the offspring of pride, so it is the parent of every evil word and work; whereas, every man that hath in him this living hope, is "holy as He that calleth him is holy:" Every man that can truly say to his brethren in Christ, "Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and we shall see him as he is,"purifieth himself, even as He is pure."

2. This hope implies, First, the testimony of our own spirit or conscience, that we walk "in simplicity and godly sincerity;" Secondly, the testimony of the Spirit of God, "bearing witness with," or to, "our spirit, that we are the children of God," "and if children, then heirs, heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ."

3. Let us well observe what is here taught us by God himself, touching this glorious privilege of his children. Who is it that is here said to bear witness? Not our spirit only, but another; even the Spirit of God: He it is who "beareth witness with our spirit." What is it he beareth witness of? "That we are the children of God,"and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ;" (Rom. 8:16, 17;) "if so be that we suffer with him," if we deny ourselves, if we take up our cross daily, if we cheerfully endure persecution or reproach for his sake, "that we may also be glorified together." And in whom doth the Spirit of God bear this witness? In all who are the children of God. By this very argument does the Apostle prove, in the preceding verses, that they are so: "As many," saith he, "as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God."For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of Adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father!" It follows, "The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God." (8:14-16.)

4. The variation of the phrase in the fifteenth verse is worthy our observation: "Ye have received the Spirit of Adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father!" Ye, as many as are the sons of God, have, in virtue of your sonship, received that selfsame Spirit of Adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father: We, the Apostles, Prophets, Teachers, (for so the word may not improperly be understood,) we, through whom you have believed, the "ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God." As we and you have one Lord, so we have one Spirit: As we have one faith, so we have one hope also. We and you are sealed with one "Spirit of promise," the earnest of your and of our inheritance: The same Spirit bearing witness with your and with our spirit, "that we are the children of God." (Rom. 8:14-16).

5. And thus is the Scripture fulfilled, "Blessed are they that mourn, for they shall be comforted." For it is easy to believe, that though sorrow may precede this witness of God's Spirit with our spirit; (indeed must, in some degree, while we groan under fear, and a sense of the wrath of God abiding on us;) yet, as soon as any man feeleth it in himself, his "sorrow is turned into joy." Whatever his pain may have been before; yet, as soon as that "hour is come, he remembereth the anguish no more, for joy" that he is born of God. It may be, many of you have now sorrow, because you are "aliens from the commonwealth of Israel;" because you are conscious to yourselves that you have not this Spirit; that you are "without hope and without God in the world." But when the Comforter is come, "then your heart shall rejoice;" yea, "your joy shall be full," and "that joy no man taketh from you." (John 16:22.) "We joy in God," will ye say, "through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement;"by whom we have access into this grace," this state of grace, of favor, or reconciliation with God, "wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God." (Rom. 5:2.) "Ye," saith St. Peter, whom God hath "begotten again unto a lively hope, are kept by the power of God unto salvation: Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations; that the trial of your faith may be found unto praise, and honor, and glory, at the appearing of Jesus Christ: In whom, though now ye see him not, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory." (1 Peter 1:5, etc..) Unspeakable indeed! It is not for the tongue of man to describe this joy in the Holy Ghost. It is "the hidden manna, which no man knoweth, save he that receiveth it." But this we know, it not only remains, but overflows, in the depth of affliction. "Are the comforts of God small" with his children, when all earthly comforts fail? Not so. But when sufferings most abound, the comforts of his Spirit do much more abound; insomuch that the sons of God "laugh at destruction when it cometh;" at want, pain, hell, and the grave; as knowing Him who "hath the keys of death and hell," and will shortly "cast them into the bottomless pit;" as hearing even now the great voice out of heaven, saying, "Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes, and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain; for the former things are passed away." (Rev. 21:3, 4.)

III. 1. A Third scriptural mark of those who are born of God, and the greatest of all, is love; even "the love of God shed abroad in their hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto them." (Rom. 5:5.) "Because they are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son in their hearts, crying, Abba, Father!" (Gal. 4:6.) By this Spirit, continually looking up to God as their reconciled and loving Father, they cry to him for their daily bread, for all things needful, whether for their souls or bodies. They continually pour out their hearts before him, knowing "they have the petitions which they ask of him." (1 John 5:15.) Their delight is in him. He is the joy of their heart; their "shield," and their "exceeding great reward." The desire of their soul is toward him; it is their "meat and drink to do his will;" and they are "satisfied as with marrow and fatness, while their mouth praiseth him with joyful lips." (Psalm 63:5.)

2. And, in this sense also, "every one who loveth him that begat, loveth him that is begotten of him." (1 John 5:1.) His spirit rejoiceth in God his Savior. He "loveth the Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity." He is so "joined unto the Lord," as to be one spirit. His soul hangeth upon Him, and chooseth Him as altogether lovely, "the chiefest among ten thousand." He knoweth, he feeleth what that means, "My Beloved is mine, and I am his." (Song 2:16.) "Thou art fairer than the children of men; full of grace are thy lips, because God hath anointed thee for ever!" (Psalm 45:2.)

3. The necessary fruit of this love of God is the love of our neighbor; of every soul which God hath made; not excepting our enemies; not excepting those who are now "despitefully using and persecuting us;" -- a love whereby we love every man as ourselves; as we love our own souls. Nay, our Lord has expressed it still more strongly, teaching us to "love one another even as He hath loved us." Accordingly, the commandment written in the hearts of all those that love God, is no other than this, "As I have loved you, so love ye one another." Now, "herein perceive we the love of God, in that he laid down his life for us." (1 John 3:16.) "We ought," then, as the Apostle justly infers, "to lay down our lives for the brethren." If we feel ourselves ready to do this, then do we truly love our neighbor. Then "we know that we have passed from death unto life, because we" thus "love the brethren." (1 John 3:14.) "Hereby know we" that we are born of God, that we "dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his" loving "Spirit." (1 John 4:13.) For "love is of God; and every one that" thus "loveth is born of God, and knoweth God." (1 John 4:7.)

4. But some may possibly ask, "Does not the Apostle say, 'This is the love of God, that we keep his commandments?'" (1 John 5:3.) Yea, and this is the love of our neighbor also, in the same sense as it is the love of God. But what would you infer from hence? that the keeping the outward commandments is all that is implied in loving God with all your heart, with all your mind, and soul, and strength, and in loving your neighbor as yourself? that the love of God is not an affection of the soul, but merely an outward service? and that the love of our neighbor is not a disposition of heart, but barely a course of outward works? To mention so wild an interpretation of the Apostle's words, is sufficiently to confute it. The plain indisputable meaning of that text is, -- this is the sign or proof of the love of God, of our keeping the first and great commandment, to keep the rest of his commandments. For true love, if it be once shed abroad in our heart, will constrain us so to do; since, whosoever loves God with all his heart, cannot but serve him with all his strength.

5. A Second fruit then of the love of God (so far as it can be distinguished from it) is universal obedience to him we love, and conformity to his will; obedience to all the commands of God, internal and external; obedience of the heart and of the life; in every temper, and in all manner of conversation. And one of the tempers most obviously implied herein, is, the being "zealous of good works;" the hungering and thirsting to do good, in every possible kind, unto all men; the rejoicing to "spend and be spent for them," for every child of man; not looking for any recompence in this world, but only in the resurrection of the just.

IV. 1. Thus have I plainly laid down those marks of the new birth which I find laid down in Scripture. Thus doth God himself answer that weighty question, What is it to be born of God? Such, if the appeal be made to the oracles of God, is "every one that is born of the Spirit." This it is, in the judgment of the Spirit of God, to be a son or a child of God: It is, so to believe in God, through Christ, as "not to commit sin," and to enjoy at all times, and in all places, that "peace of God which passeth all understanding." It is, so to hope in God through the Son of his love, as to have not only the "testimony of a good conscience," but also the Spirit of God "bearing witness with your spirits, that ye are the children of God;" whence cannot but spring the rejoicing in Him, through whom ye "have received the atonement." It is, so to love God, who hath thus loved you, as you never did love any creature: So that ye are constrained to love all men as yourselves; with a love not only ever burning in your hearts, but flaming out in all your actions and conversations, and making your whole life one "labor of love," one continued obedience to those commands, "Be ye merciful, as God is merciful;"Be ye holy, as I the Lord am holy:"Be ye perfect, as your Father which is in heaven is perfect."

2. Who then are ye that are thus born of God? Ye "know the things which are given to you of God." Ye well know that ye are the children of God, and "can assure your hearts before him." And every one of you who has observed these words cannot but feel, and know of a truth, whether at this hour, (answer to God, and not to man!) you are thus a child of God or no. The question is not, what you was made in baptism; (do not evade;) but, What are you now? Is the Spirit of adoption now in your heart? To your own heart let the appeal be made. I ask not, whether you was born of water and of the Spirit; but are you now the temple of the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in you? I allow you was "circumcised with the circumcision of Christ;" (as St. Paul emphatically terms baptism;) but does the Spirit of Christ and of glory now rest upon you? Else "your circumcision is become uncircumcision."

3 . Say not then in your heart, "I was once baptized, therefore I am now a child of God." Alas, that consequence will by no means hold. How many are the baptized gluttons and drunkards, the baptized liars and common swearers, the baptized railers and evil-speakers, the baptized whoremongers, thieves, extortioners? What think you? Are these now the children of God? Verily, I say unto you, whosoever you are, unto whom any one of the preceding characters belongs, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the works of your father ye do." Unto you I call, in the name of Him whom you crucify afresh, and in his words to your circumcised predecessors, "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?"

4. How, indeed, except ye be born again! For ye are now dead in trespasses and sins. To say, then, that ye cannot be born again, that there is no new birth but in baptism, is to seal you all under damnation, to consign you to hell, without help, without hope. And perhaps some may think this just and right. In their zeal for the Lord of hosts, they may say, "Yea, cut off the sinners, the Amalekites! Let these Gibeonites be utterly destroyed! They deserve no less." No; nor I, nor you. Mine and your desert, as well as theirs, is hell; and it is mere mercy, free, undeserved mercy, that we are not now in unquenchable fire. You will say, "But we are washed;" we were born again "of water and of the Spirit." So were they: This, therefore, hinders not at all, but that ye may now be even as they. Know ye not, that "what is highly esteemed of men is an abomination in the sight of God?" Come forth, ye "saints of the world," ye that are honored of men, and see who will cast the first stone at them, at these wretches not fit to live upon the earth, these common harlots, adulterers, murderers. Only learn ye first what that meaneth, "He that hateth his brother is a murderer." (1 John 3:15.) "He that looketh on a woman, to lust after her, hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." (Matt. 5:28.) "Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God?" (James 4:4.)

5. "Verily, verily, I say unto you, ye" also "must be born again."Except ye" also "be born again, ye cannot see the kingdom of God." Lean no more on the staff of that broken reed, that ye were born again in baptism. Who denies that ye were then made children of God, and heirs of the kingdom of heaven? But, nevertheless this, ye are now children of the devil. Therefore ye must be born again. And let not Satan put it into your heart to cavil at a word, when the thing is clear. Ye have heard what are the marks of the children of God: All ye who have them not on your souls, baptized or unbaptized, must needs receive them, or without doubt ye will perish everlastingly. And if ye have been baptized, your only hope is this, -- that those who were made the children of God by baptism, but are now the children of the devil, may yet again receive "power to become the sons of God;" that they may receive again what they have lost, even the "Spirit of adoption, crying in their hearts, Abba, Father!"

Amen, Lord Jesus! May every one who prepareth his heart yet again to seek thy face, receive again that Spirit of adoption, and cry out, "Abba, Father!" Let him now again have power so to believe in thy name as to become a child of God; as to know and feel he hath "redemption in thy blood, even the forgiveness of sins;" and that he "cannot commit sin, because he is born of God." Let him be now "begotten again unto a living hope," so as to "purify himself as thou art pure;" and "because he is a son," let the Spirit of love and of glory rest upon him, cleansing him "from all filthiness of flesh and spirit," and teaching him to "perfect holiness in the fear of God!"


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-187 next last
To: Jerry_M
I will probably catch some flack for this (I did earlier when I mentioned it), and am quick to admit that this is nothing more than a speculative guess without any substantiation.

Hey, I'd root for her.

81 posted on 09/06/2001 9:07:14 PM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Great, you also shoot cap-n-ball. I have an 1851 Navy Colt .36 (replica) that I love to shoot, and am fairly accurate with, despite the abysmal sights.

The only .45 I shoot is .45 ACP from a Sistema Colt 1911A1 that I customized. I am awaiting delivery of a .50 caliber flintlock rifle, and purchased a lb. of FFFFg on the way home from work today in order to prime it once it arrives. My shooting tastes are somewhat eclectic, including "black" rifles, M1 Garands, Makarovs, an assortment of .22s, and a couple of Glocks as well.

I guess that we will have to quit, since we are way off topic, chasing jack rabbits!

82 posted on 09/06/2001 9:07:56 PM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
Your #48: Now, the very fact that there are pseudo-conversions tells us that there are unregenerate folks who will receive some Bible truths at some level in their deceitful and desperately/unknowably wicked hearts.

And the state of your own heart is? And the probability of yours being a pseudo-conversion, given your predatory behavior, is? God looketh upon the heart.

You write: Next, notice that when we put this interesting fact alongside the fact that the pseudo-conversions do outnumber the genuine conversions, the evidential value of a person's testimony and smattering of Bible knowledge can be essentially neutralized by the display of lying spirit. So, tell me again why I should be unwilling to warn doctrinal liars?

You are unwilling to tell the truth about those you are accusing. You call them doctrinal liars when all they do is disagree with you. Remember that he that exalteth himself shall be abased.

You are unwilling to tell the truth about me, or RnMom, or drot, or GWB. Everyone is a case of pseudo-conversion to you who disagrees with you about as little as the interpretation of a single verse.

When a shepherd goes looking for a lost sheep, and a predator (a wolf) goes looking also, the sheep is the same, the sheep is just as lost, but the approach is different, the motive is different, the methods are different, and the end result is different.

So don't be a predator. God loves you, and wants you to be filled with His love. Instead, you must be filled with the awful negativity and bitterness that comes out in your posts, or it could not flow forth in such profusion.

83 posted on 09/06/2001 9:17:25 PM PDT by White Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M, CCWoody
I'm thinking about getting a Model 26 Glock nine for CCW. (Oh, BTW, CCWoody, the reason why I immediately knew the significance of your present screen name was the fact that I am steeped in a grad school research project on the Texas CCW law.)

What do you fellows think about a Glock nine for CCW? I like the hammerless action and good reputation for not jamming (which seems potentially important for a gun that stays in, say, a coat pocket for a long time).

84 posted on 09/06/2001 9:26:04 PM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: White Mountain
Your foot shall slide in due time.
85 posted on 09/06/2001 9:31:45 PM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Actually, the best argument, IMO, is 1 Corinthians 2:14.

After you notice all of the logical implications of that verse, another real shocker for you thoughtful perusal is John 3:3.

86 posted on 09/06/2001 9:47:49 PM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
another real shocker for you thoughtful perusal is John 3:3.

I'll have to think about what I think you just said while I'm away this weekend. I wonder how wonder just how many others will understand what you mean.

87 posted on 09/06/2001 10:03:03 PM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody, jude24
I think I understand what you understand I think. Ha!

Anyway, one of the most astonishing doctrines in the entire Bible is hidden in plain sight in John 3:3.


88 posted on 09/06/2001 10:21:45 PM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush,the_doc,ALL
#57: "..That is, in many ways, the real meaning of the sancification in Hebrews 10:14. ... It is that perfection of His sacrifice which sanctifies us forever .... continuously, not eternally."

Wrong. It is both eternally AND continuously.

Heb.10:14 "...by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy."

Sanctification is both a one time event AND an ongoing process.

The one time event is our sanctification *positionally* when we are separated from the sinful and set apart for a sacred purpose.

Even though we are sanctified fully in Christ (saved), we are gradually becoming *experientially* what we are *positionally* during the sanctification process.

Therefore, it is both eternal AND continuous.

89 posted on 09/06/2001 10:55:16 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (Sanctification = Saved (made holy) positionally and being made holy experientially.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: All
On a previous thread, I pointed out that King David said his soul would not be left in hell, and someone challenged that, writing that Peter said that referred to Christ. So let's look at the relevant passages in full:

Matthew 27:50-53
50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Peter said on the Day of Pentecost that David was not among these.

Psalm 16: A Psalm of David
8 I have set the LORD always before me: because he is at my right hand, I shall not be moved.
9 Therefore my heart is glad, and my glory rejoiceth: my flesh also shall rest in hope.
10 For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.
11 Thou wilt shew me the path of life: in thy presence is fulness of joy; at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore.

Peter quotes this passage in his sermon on the Day of Pentecost:

Acts 2
24 Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.
25 For David speaketh concerning him [Christ], I foresaw the Lord always before my face, for he is on my right hand, that I should not be moved:
26 Therefore did my heart rejoice, and my tongue was glad; moreover also my flesh shall rest in hope:
27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.
28 Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance.
29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day.
30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;
31 He [David] seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his [Christ's] soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.
32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.
33 Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear.
34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
35 Until I make thy foes thy footstool.

(Emphasis, brackets, and color are mine.)

It is clear that in Psalm 16:10a, David refers to his own soul, and in verse 10b to the Holy One of Israel, Jesus Christ. Peter affirms that David was not among the righteous: in Acts 2:29 he says David was not resurrected with the righteous (see Matthew 27:53), and in verse 34 he says David is not ascended into the heavens. David had not yet paid the full price that he needs to pay for the murder of Uriah. But David declares in Psalm 16:10a that the LORD will not leave his soul in hell, that eventually there will come an end to his sojourn there.

Now Peter, in Acts 2:31, applies both halves of Psalm 16:10 to Christ. If Peter hadn't done that and I tried to do it, you guys would object, given the plain meaning of Psalm 16:10a and Acts 2:27a, and you would be horrified that I would suggest that Christ, being sinless, would ever go to hell at all. But Peter is an apostle and a prophet, the chief of the apostles in fact, and his point is that the physical body and the spirit of Christ did not remain apart from each other long enough for physical decomposition (corruption) to take place. Psalm 16:10a can be likened unto Christ because He did go preach to the spirits in prison (see 1 Peter 3:19), indeed it is quite useful for that purpose, and that is what Peter did, liken it unto Christ. But it doesn't fit Christ exactly (not that it needs to for Peter's purpose), for it was not a question of God leaving Christ in hell, "because it was not possible that he should be holden of it" (Acts 2:24).

Now if this explanation does not satisfy you (and it probably won't because you guys think once in hell, always in hell, and you are not about to let Psalm 16:10a get in the way of that), then don't worry about it. The Scriptures are wrested so much around here that I do not want to even have the appearance of doing so myself.

90 posted on 09/06/2001 11:43:00 PM PDT by White Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Close tags

91 posted on 09/06/2001 11:48:22 PM PDT by White Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: All
(Reposting so you can see what is bold and what isn't...)

On a previous thread, I pointed out that King David said his soul would not be left in hell, and someone challenged that, writing that Peter said that referred to Christ. So let's look at the relevant passages in full:

Matthew 27:50-53
50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Peter said on the Day of Pentecost that David was not among these.

Psalm 16: A Psalm of David
8 I have set the LORD always before me: because he is at my right hand, I shall not be moved.
9 Therefore my heart is glad, and my glory rejoiceth: my flesh also shall rest in hope.
10 For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.
11 Thou wilt shew me the path of life: in thy presence is fulness of joy; at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore.

Peter quotes this passage in his sermon on the Day of Pentecost:

Acts 2
24 Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.
25 For David speaketh concerning him [Christ], I foresaw the Lord always before my face, for he is on my right hand, that I should not be moved:
26 Therefore did my heart rejoice, and my tongue was glad; moreover also my flesh shall rest in hope:
27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.
28 Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance.
29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day.
30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;
31 He [David] seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his [Christ's] soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.
32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.
33 Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear.
34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
35 Until I make thy foes thy footstool.

(Emphasis, brackets, and color are mine.)

It is clear that in Psalm 16:10a, David refers to his own soul, and in verse 10b to the Holy One of Israel, Jesus Christ. Peter affirms that David was not among the righteous: in Acts 2:29 he says David was not resurrected with the righteous (see Matthew 27:53), and in verse 34 he says David is not ascended into the heavens. David had not yet paid the full price that he needs to pay for the murder of Uriah. But David declares in Psalm 16:10a that the LORD will not leave his soul in hell, that eventually there will come an end to his sojourn there.

Now Peter, in Acts 2:31, applies both halves of Psalm 16:10 to Christ. If Peter hadn't done that and I tried to do it, you guys would object, given the plain meaning of Psalm 16:10a and Acts 2:27a, and you would be horrified that I would suggest that Christ, being sinless, would ever go to hell at all. But Peter is an apostle and a prophet, the chief of the apostles in fact, and his point is that the physical body and the spirit of Christ did not remain apart from each other long enough for physical decomposition (corruption) to take place. Psalm 16:10a can be likened unto Christ because He did go preach to the spirits in prison (see 1 Peter 3:19), indeed it is quite useful for that purpose, and that is what Peter did, liken it unto Christ. But it doesn't fit Christ exactly (not that it needs to for Peter's purpose), for it was not a question of God leaving Christ in hell, "because it was not possible that he should be holden of it" (Acts 2:24).

Now if this explanation does not satisfy you (and it probably won't because you guys think once in hell, always in hell, and you are not about to let Psalm 16:10a get in the way of that), then don't worry about it. The Scriptures are wrested so much around here that I do not want to even have the appearance of doing so myself.

92 posted on 09/06/2001 11:52:51 PM PDT by White Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: drot
An immediate and constant fruit of this faith whereby we are born of God, a fruit which can in no wise be separated from it, no, not for an hour, is power over sin; -- power over outward sin of every kind; over every evil word and work

This is where many people turn their backs on God because, who, please find me one, can obtain this standard, especially because the Word says that if we even think the thought . . .

In my humble opinion, the New Birth is all about atonement for sin, not about abolishing it. All have sinned and come short of the Glory of God. Jesus was our atonement, our covering and reconciliation to God, because we have all sinned and none can, therefore, enter His presence with sin. And the New Birth is acceptance of this fact and the resulting Lordship of Christ because of it. Whether we sin or not.

93 posted on 09/07/2001 12:01:05 AM PDT by LoneGreenEyeshade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
To the_doc-I started reading your post on Romans and stopped right at the point where you stated that 'God did not intend to save them!(Vs6)

This is obvious from two points (now, I do not want to misundertand you!) God gives the free offer and they will not repent. Sinners use their what, 'free will' do they?

You double tongued devil!

You know full well that Total depravity means that the sinner can ONLY make one decision, to continue to follow his old nature.

That is why God must regenerate first, so then the New Man' can repent and believe (Iresistible grace)

You use the terms 'free' when there is no choice involved! Now tell us how we are misunderstanding you!(the oddly free refusal to accept the free offer of the Gospel!)

Then you go on-Regeneration MUST preceed saving faith-a point that you told Woody that was not necessary!

Why must Regeneration preceed saving faith doc? Is it because the unRegenerate man CANNOT believe BECAUSE OF TOTAL DEPRAVITY!

You pious fraud!

Now, lament that no one understands you!

To use 'oddly free refusal' when you know that according to your wicked system man CANNOT chose for God, God must chose him.

Funny, doc, I didn't see much on Romans! All of sudden you jump to John!

Rom.10:1 Brethren, my hearts desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.

Rom.11:1 I say then hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham of the tribe of Benjamin

Hey, doc, see any connection!

God intended for Israel to fall?

Rom.10:21 But to Israel he saith, All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people (sounds like a little resistance there (Acts.7:51) against God's will!

Yet, God in His WISDOM turned Israel's rejection of Him into His glory by creating the church, the bride for His Son (Rom.11:25,Eph.5:30)

Your system has God choosing who will be saved and who be lost from the beginning, with no basis for that choice except His own sovereign will. All your talk about 'freedom' 'choice'and 'grace' are only phoney pious talk to deceive those who do not know WHAT you really mean by 'freedom' and 'choice'.

Even so, come Lord Jesus

94 posted on 09/07/2001 3:17:24 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
To the_doc-Gee, doc do you think that Jn3:3 could be connected to Jn.3:15

That whosoever (there's that darn word again-ofcourse WE know that only is a 'public' offer not the private one-right doc!) believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.

How about Jn.1:12, or Gal.3:26?

Could that be HOW we become 'born again (2Cor.5:17)

Oh, no! God MUST choose those who He would save (even though the Atonement APPEARS to be for everyone, God is tricky that way), since man is SO depraved that he cannot make a decision for Christ, even if the light of the Gospel is shined into his soul to make the issue clear (2Cor.4:6).

TULIP has rotted your minds, no lie, no distortion, no context dropping is too much to defend your god(2Cor.4:4).

The Lord God of the Bible is not the god of TULIP.

Even so, come Lord Jesus

95 posted on 09/07/2001 3:33:18 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
To George W.Bush-Gee, and maybe the context of those verses may explain something?

I am convinced! If the verse says 'election' it must be election as defined by TULIP!

How do you explain the free will offers? Are they real or only apparent? Is God deceiving us, with words like 'all' and 'whosoever'?

Even so, come Lord Jesus

96 posted on 09/07/2001 3:43:08 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
To CCWoody-No one is going to REALLY understand what doc said Woody, except you and Jerry M, and Uriel, spudgin, George Bush-yea, you guys will get it-real deeeeep!

Even so, come Lord Jesus

97 posted on 09/07/2001 3:53:29 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: White Mountain
To White Mountain- the Lord did go into 'Hell' and bring out of it the OT saints who were waiting for the Saviour to appear (Lk 16,explains the different compartments). In Eph.4:8-9 makes it clear that He went down and came back and now has the keys of hell and death(Rev.1:18)

Acts 2:23 is referring to Christ since it states, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption (speaking of Christs body). Christ's body did not see corruption but David's did.

Even so, come Lord Jesus

98 posted on 09/07/2001 4:04:28 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: White Mountain
To White Mountain-that was a one time deal, and the 'hell' had Abraham bosom, where there was no suffering.

Now, with Christ risen, hell is only torments and is permanant at least until the Lake of Fire (Rev.20)

Acts 17:30,And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men everywhere to repent

See also, 17:31

Even so, come Lord Jesus

99 posted on 09/07/2001 4:11:58 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
However, when you deny that Hebrews 10:14 teaches that those being sanctified - those who are perfected forever - can be thrown into hell, then you in fact blasphemey my Glorious Redeemer and trample His blood under foot. It is our sanctification which is perfected forever. Not ourselves. At least, Woody, I haven't been perfected forever yet. How about you? If you haven't been perfected yet, maybe you really do need to re-examine your reading here and whose judgment you trust.

I am, however, quite confident that my sanctification (and that of any Christian) is perfected forever, that through the sacrifice Christ made for me at His cross, I may always approach God, through prayer in this life by Christ's intercession at God's right hand and, after this life, directly to His throne, still sanctified by Christ, the only Redeemer that could make me, a Gentile and a sinner, acceptable to approach the Father who is Holy Holy Holy. All due to Christ's perfect sacrifice which has sanctified me (and you) to God the Father before whom we are utterly unholy, fallen in the utter depravity of the curse earned by Adam in the Fall.

To return to your assertion that I "deny that Hebrews 10:14 teaches that those being sanctified - those who are perfected forever - can be thrown into hell" is a blasphemy and that I am trampling Christ underfoot, I will say flatly that you are wrong. I will not say you are lying because I've never yet seen the slightest indication from you that you have any knowledge and awareness of any of scripture which actually does support Perseverance other than your finding in Hebrews 10. The isolated Calvinists on this thread seem to be rather reluctant to start a thread on that topic and for reasons all too obvious. I do not deny eternal security. I affirm it. And I affirm it personally for myself. But I don't find it in 10:14 any more than the great exegetes did. And don't bother to accuse me of putting myself in their league. I don't. I'm not some self-styled "apostolic Christian" who hides behind anonymity while spinning out strange novel Bible readings and calling everybody damned. I'll have to work on that skill more.

I can understand why you and the others might read your particular meaning into those verses. But I would urge you to return again and read the preceding verses, Hebrews 10:1-13. Within any literature, there is a context and a flow of ideas. The Bible, to be understood at all, has to be assumed to be no different, that it does follow these general literary principles in order to be comprehended at all. It is not, contrary to what some here would teach, some incredibly mysterious and arcane document. That notion which doc promotes constantly to support his claims of authority is classic gnosis, the idea that the Bible contains strange and secret meanings offered only to some supernatural elite. But don't think that I'm undermining the notion of the Elect here either. I'm just saying that you can be as dumb as a post and still be Elect and still read the Word very profitably. And study helps and commentaries don't detract, they help. Especially for those of us who aren't great Bible students. Maybe you should think for a moment about how many of the very learned in Bible studies will certainly end up in hell. I say that the Word was given for the instruction of all, not to some rare few. If you are suspicious of these commentaries, why don't you ask doc how many he owns and how much he's spent on them? You might be surprised. Why not ask Jerry (or your own pastor) how many they have?

Returning to the literary flow of chapter 10, a finding of eternal security in 14 reads very strangely when you read the preceding verses. But reading, as the great scholars do, Christ's perpetual sacrifice that grants our eternal sanctification before the Father in that scripture passage, completes the section and unifies it beautifully. It is a meaning that is also vital to the harmonics of other scripture that testify to the same truths. But Hebrews 10 is one of the strongest statements of this in the New Testamentt. It is central to the presentation of Christ, the perfect eternal sacrifice, now the High Priest and Intercessor with the Father, and our future King. In short, our Gentile Messiah and the Jewish Messiah, the light unto all nations, the complete and perfect fulfillment of all the prophecies and the Law. These are what I find in Hebrews 10. And I'm not too ashamed of it because the great scholars also found it ther. So did C. H. Spurgeon. My eternal security has solid foundations but they do not require me to rob Hebrews 10:14 of its meaning in order to support Perseverance.

And why can't you see it? Ah, well.

I don't think you're damned because you follow an unorthodox reading of Hebrews 10:14. But you're poorer for not seeing what Paul wrote here in such strong testimony. And it's a self-inflicted poverty. Please reconsider your notion that eternal security stands or falls on this verse alone (it doesn't) and consider what the great scholars taught. Not what some anonymous amateur writes on a right-wing political message board. (That would be me or doc for instance.) But men who staked their lives and reputations and were found very worthy for over three hundred years, the men whose work was the backbone of the Reformation and still is. It's a great legacy. Don't scorn their gift of scholarship. I think you'd find a real devotional richness in Calvin and in Darby. They're brilliant and learned but they are very careful and they intend to write so that they can be understood clearly. And it is their great love of the Word that I trust to be my guide. In Calvin especially, I find consistently a full reading and exposition but rarely a tendecny to overread a certain passage. By comparison, so many other commentators toss everything they can possibly find into a single verse.

In an absurd way, you are guilty of the same crime as the Wesleyans are. They deny what this scripture says because they, in a Scripture twisting zeal, make it fit to their doctrine. Well, you too have created a doctrine based upon others words and now twist Scripture to make it fit your doctrine. Never mind that your doctrine contains the correct language. If you can't even read simple and direct scripture passages, then you need to give yourself a serious spiritual examination. I want to laugh at the hysterical irony of this, but the seriousness of it has stopped me. In fact, I did read it before consulting any commentaries. It was only the strangeness of doc's arguments that turned me toward the commentaries.

I do find it a little ironic that you are accusing me of being "guilty of the same crime as the Wesleyans are." Well, leaving aside that that you, a Calvinist, doesn't actually read Calvin but are now claiming that Hebrews 10:14 has in some way "perfected" you "forever", brings to mind some of the arguments we've had with Wesleyans over sinless perfection. You, apparently, are now claiming by your reading of Hebrews 10:14 that you have been "perfected forever". So, if you're not "sinlessly perfect" like the Wesleyans are, then in exactly what way have you been "eternally perfected" in this life? And don't give me that malarky about "progressive sanctification". I've heard it before and even Uriel, a very talented writer and a strong mind, couldn't make a very strong pitch for the idea. Persuasive as he is, he still didn't sell me with it. I notice that no one has made that "progressive sanctification" argument in quite a while and it's because it's weak. And it's weak because it is completely inconsistent with the meaning of Hebrews 10:1-13. The more doc has defended his eternal security and Uriel defended the idea of "progressive sanctification" in Hebrews 10:14, the more obvious it became that these readings made utter nonsense of the preceding verses and the whole idea of the New Covenant in Christ replacing the Old Covenant.

FR Calvinists reading both "eternal security" and "progressive sanctification" in 10:14 is almost as strange as Wesleyans reading "sinless perfection" in 10:14. Neither one fits. And, interestingly enough, if one looks at the entirety of Wesley's Bible Notes on 10:1-14, you actually find he's not too far from Calvin, Henry, Ownen, Darby, Pink, etc. It's only here at FR that things get more wooly. You know, not everything in the history of Christendom is actually about a fight between Calvin and Arminius and Wesley. Heck, there are even a few things we aren't entitled to disagree with the poor deluded papists and mormons about (I'm really warming up to ecumenical fervor now).

What I'm saying is that a really big fight over 10:14 is only occurring here at FR. Calvin and the real scholars had it sorted out. Even Wesley didn't go too terribly wrong here. Their battleground did not lie in Hebrews 10:1-18. The really contentious portion of Hebrews 10, a long chapter, is in the last half, following verse 18 which should have been, as I have probably stated elsewhere, a separate chapter.

We will only be perfected eternally after death, not in this life. Calvin and the other great scholars were very careful in this distinction. I would hope that you carefully consider their opinion that Hebrews 10:14 teaches that we are sanctified perfectly by Christ's once-only sacrifice, not perfected

100 posted on 09/07/2001 4:57:08 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson