Politically correct terrorism: David Kupelian identifies the enemy, since no one else will

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, September 28, 2001 | David Kupelian

[Common Tator]

IF we had been concerned about Good Germans and Good Japanese in World War II the few of us still alive would be slaves to a society that considered us to be inferior animals.

All Middle Eastern Muslims believe that we are the great SATAN. How many times have you heard them call us that?

Why are we surprised that they want to kill SATAN?

[irgbar-man]

I have come up with a term for the events of Sept. 11 - "the Great Provocation." PC is a lesser provocation, but all the same, it's a tool of the enemies of freedom.

"We all know that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter and that Reuters upholds the principle that we do not use the word terrorist," he wrote in an internal memo. "To be frank, it adds little to call the attack on the World Trade Center a terrorist attack."

Mr. Journalist, you ignorant slut: WE ALL KNOW you are not with us. You are with the terrorists. To be frank, you may even be lower than the murderous moles who were/are willing to die for their cause. You are cowardly and seditious.

Political correctness is intimidation, and that is the facially challenged (ugly) truth.

I think I will email this article to everyone I know. Your service is appreciated, JH2.

[Lent]

Good bump and great piece.

[CubicleGuy]

If America is to have any chance of prevailing in this war – which is not only a military conflict, but a cultural and spiritual one as well – we in the Free World have to come to grips with Islam. But to do so, we first have to come to grips with ourselves. We must become virtuous. We must become courageous. We must become self-disciplined, mature and uncompromisingly honest. And we must throw political correctness onto "the unmarked grave" of history.

It's been nice knowin' y'all.

[DCPatriot]

"...Take a deep breath. Of the world's approximately 1.2 billion Muslims, an estimated 10 to 15 percent are of the militant "Islamist" strain. Do the math – that's well over 100 million human beings who, to a greater or lesser degree, are caught up with what amounts to the world's most dangerous cult."

Well, this is as far as I had to read.

I am sick to my stomach. I want to see Baghdad, Tehran, and a half-dozen cities in Afghanistan to be nuked. TODAY!!

What in the hell will it take? A bio-chemical attach, that kills hundreds of thousands of innocent Americans?

Just what in the SAM BLAZES is going on??

Kill them all, and let Allah sort it out. At the very least it will ensure about 50 years of peace.

[Irma]

Political correctness HAS to be jettisoned now, and we have to do whatever it takes to lead the jettisoning. I'm flagging some experts on taking action...

I thought you were going to say "I'm flagging some experts who are not very politically correct". Hahahahaha!

Seriously, you (and the author of this article) are so correct, Mr. Cannon. We MUST put a halt to this "PC" nonsense which ultimately threatens, if left unchecked, to expose us as sitting ducks (although politically correct ducks) for the cowardly acts of the TERRORISTS!

Thanks for the flag. Terrific article.

[Irma]

Well now, we can add CNN to the PC list.....

CNN Will not call Terrorists, "Terrorists"

As Miss Marple so correctly pointed out on that thread.......

"Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. "

[ivanhoe116]

Those brave people in the World Trade Center, and heroes aboard those airliners on September 11, unknowingly, were the first line of defense in a war where there are only soldiers, no civilians. They fell, victims of that first strike, because they were unarmed, unprepared and unaware that this moral war was declared and directed at them.

Now that the lines have been drawn there is only to set the parameters of combat and take the ground that has always been coveted, the high ground. In this war our high ground has been personal freedom and liberty; we will need to retreat ever so slightly. Theirs has been theological aloofness; it will need to be humbled.

The symbol of our liberty, manifested in the statue that stands in New York harbor, may have been, for all we know, a target—one that would have struck us dumbfound, surely as the destruction of the White House, public building or any of our peaceful surroundings.

We need now, to respond in kind, not only as in a Doolittle type raid of vindication, but also in a demonstration of resolve as to our intentions. We need to strike at a symbol that occupies an area of their high ground—Mohamed’s grave.

In this grave there lies the said remains of the being that has hijacked liberty, freedom, Americanism, and Muslim faith. He is the antithesis of all of that, which is common between Muslim and Judean-Christian teachings. His name, memory and teachings need to be obliterated for all time.

Or grand children need never learn of his name. So to, those who would conjure up his name for the sake of personal justification and vengeance need to be removed from the scene. Any and all organizations, which are said to owe allegiance to this anti-Christ, must be expunged for all time. We must carry the weight of it on our souls in order that no future generation will. We must pay the price in order that our liberties will not.

[Rockitz]

Sorry John. I beat David to the punch.

I posted an article on identification of the enemy on 14 September on FR. In it, a number of different people are clearly identified along with their "politically correct" ideas that are now unfortunately accepted as ideals by the masses. Read on.

In the aftermath of these most recent terrorist strikes, it is becoming increasingly important to identify the enemy. This is what President Bush was referring to when he indicated that we were facing a "different kind of enemy." The enemy is no longer a readily identifiable nation or set of leaders within a nation, but has spread like yeast in dough throughout the world. The enemy includes not only obvious groups of individuals, but various wrong ideas that are being exalted as ideals by "friend" and foe alike. Here's my cut at the enemies we face with regard to terrorism.

Enemies who are people:

1) Those that would engage in violence against our country and people, i.e. terrorists.
2) Those that would aid and abet those who would engage in violence against our country and people, i.e. foreign governments, wealthy idealists, family and friends of terrorists.
3) Those that would export weapons and other technologies that can be used to generate violence or support those who propagate violence against our country or people, i.e. businessmen.
4) Those that would make it easier through regulation or lack of enforcement to export weapons and other technologies that can be used to generate violence or support those who propagate violence against our country or people, i.e. business, government, security, and law enforcement agencies.
5) Those that would seek or promote diplomatic agreements for the sake of diplomacy without achieving true security for our people, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.
6) Those that would seek or promote a judicial solution for the sake of political correctness without reasonable expectation of obtaining true justice or future security for our people, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.
7) Those that would seek or promote peace at any cost, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.
8) Those leaders who are not willing to accept the possibility for civilian or military casualties to exact justice on our enemies, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.
9) Those leaders who are not willing to temporarily sacrifice some personal freedoms, rights, conveniences, or sacrifice individual people for the increased security of all, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.

Ideological Enemies:

1) Radical Islam or any other faith or cause that promotes holy war or jihad against the US.
2) There is a judicial solution for every crime.
3) Tolerance is more important than truth.
4) All nations or people groups will play fair if given a chance.
5) All nations or people groups are capable of governing themselves.
6) The US must never occupy a country even though the indigenous people have demonstrated that they cannot govern those within their borders.
7) Innocent people must never be killed by the US military.
8) Nothing more than a measured response can be initiated against our enemies.
9) Preemptive strikes on our enemies are not appropriate.
10) The people have the right to know everything that we are doing militarily at any time. 11) The government cannot sacrifice any individuals or any individual rights for the security of the nation. (This is the scary one and hopefully only temporary)

The freedom we now enjoy hangs in the balance if we are not able to respond appropriately to these enemies. This grand experiment as an open society is going to be severely tested by these events and our response to them. God bless all of our leaders with the wisdom and discernment necessary to deal with the current crisis through thoughtful decisions. The ramifications of their decisions will be felt throughout the remainder of history.

[phillibuck]

If I had the time, I would love to research how Reuters dealt with the OK City atrocity. Did they refrain from using the word "terrorist" or "white" or "Christian" or "male" when referring to McVeigh? Out of deference, did they call him a "freedom fighter"?

Good thought, but at the same time, why ask a question you already know the answer to? There was certainly no deference made to "the white race" - nor should there have been. Same should apply across the board.

[Jerez]

I have been struck, too, by people admitting that their instinct for self-preservation has been stifled by PC. I've actually heard callers (NPR) saying that they are now ashamed to realize that they were looking at Arabs at the airport with greater suspicion -- but they're OK now, their PC override is back on! Frightening for the long run. What has happened is that, with the attack, the natural instincts of people came to the forefront. Now, after 2 weeks, the media's constant liberal PC drone has resumed its soporific effect. Back to sleep, America!

[Travis McGee]

bttt

[Rockitz]

America's job is to utterly destroy – that means kill – the terrorist network, root and branch, and likewise to destroy the governments of the terrorists' patron states. If we do this just right, with the right spirit and timing, we may just succeed in shocking those millions of future Osama bin Ladens who today are following the siren song of militant Islam, and forcing them toward the more moderate end of the spectrum.

Amen brother!

[SauronOfMordor]

bump

[Semaphore Heathcliffe]

bump