Posted on 11/16/2001 1:23:49 PM PST by Pokey78
On the way to my daughter's school this morning, I encountered the usual L.A. rush-hour road rally of elephantine sports utility vehicles, many flying American flags. Taking the cake was a massive SUV proudly sporting half a dozen -- one on each window and two on the bumper. My first thought was, how patriotic! My second was, how much more patriotic it would be to trade in the gas-guzzling leviathan for something that sips, rather than chugs, at the gas pump.
Which, thinking globally and acting locally, is precisely what I've decided to do with mine.
Though I don't consider myself an automotive fashionista, I must admit I followed the thundering herd of protective parents unable to resist the allure of what is basically a comfy Sherman tank. My SUV, a Lincoln Navigator, was, I was told, the safest way to transport my kids. And, as an added bonus, I could haul around a decent-sized Girl Scout troop.
But now we're at war, right? A New War. Everything has changed, hasn't it? Perhaps in rhetoric. In practice, what are we being called to do for the war effort other than shop 'til we drop, eat out and visit Disney World?
Given that our ability to play hardball with nations that harbor terrorists is going to be seriously compromised by our foreign oil habit, shouldn't we be doing everything we can to reduce that dependence -- starting, say, yesterday?
On Tuesday, the president ordered the government to boost its emergency stockpile of oil to "strengthen the long-term security of the United States."
But nothing is being done to heed Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham's warning that "reducing our nation's dependence on imported oil is crucial to our national energy security, now more than ever before."
On average, SUVs consume over 6 miles per gallon more than a family station wagon. No small difference when you consider that an improvement of just 3 mpg in autos nationwide would save 1 million barrels of oil per day.
On top of this, I have belatedly discovered that despite those TV ads showing them heroically scaling snow-capped mountains in a single bound, SUVs are actually risky to drive: four times more likely than cars to roll over in an accident and three times more likely to kill the occupants in a rollover.
Flag waving is great, but patriotic display is not a substitute for patriotic action. And the public is galvanized for action, just as it was during World War II. Back then, Americans answered their leaders' call for sacrifice in dozens of altruistic ways: They collected scrap metal to be refashioned as guns, planes, and tanks, planted 20 million vegetable "victory gardens," and made do with 3 gallons of gas a week. Just about what the average SUV devours on a few latte-hauling trips to Starbucks.
But when it comes to summoning the national resolve for shared sacrifice, W has been no FDR. There have been too many pep rallies and too few fireside chats. This president has the national ear, in a way few presidents ever have. The problem is, now that he's got our attention, he doesn't appear to have much to say.
His speech last week included a general call to serve our country by "mentoring a child, comforting the afflicted, housing those in need of shelter and a home." But his appeal lacked the kind of specificity that prods people out of their armchairs and into action. If the president had informed us, for instance, that 12 million children live in households where people have to skip meals to make ends meet or that there are a million homeless children in this country on any given day, then Americans would be far more likely to become what he dubbed "a Sept. 11 volunteer."
Of course, when it comes to acting on our patriotism, we don't have to wait for our leaders. If they won't lead, we can just step around them. And when it comes to the vital issue of energy policy, it appears that we'll have to.
As well as giving up our SUVs -- or, even better, switching to hybrid gas-and-electric cars that currently get up to 64 mpg -- we can all make simple adjustments to wean our country from the foreign oil teat, even if our leaders are too dazed by the energy and auto industry lobbies to guide us.
We can, for example, make sure our tires are fully inflated, reducing gas consumption by 2 percent, we can slow down to 65 miles per hour, reducing highway gas consumption by 15 percent, and we can stop idling our cars in drive-through window and school carpool lanes. And at home we can help conserve fuel by turning thermostats down, weather-stripping doors and windows, buying energy-efficient fluorescent lightbulbs, and unplugging cell phone chargers and hair dryers.
We can't go on consuming 25 percent of the world's oil while being only 5 percent of the global population. At least not if we want to get serious about putting the screws to any number of oil-rich and terrorist-friendly nations.
Laura Bush gave voice to a widely held sentiment when she said that Sept. 11 has made us "more determined and prepared, wiser and in many ways better." Not because of the number of flags attached to car windows or news anchors' lapels but because of the willingness the American people have shown to make whatever sacrifices are necessary to meet the challenge to our way of life.
Frankly, saying hasta la vista to my 13 mpg Navigator and hello to a 23 mpg Volvo V70 station wagon is hardly a sacrifice. But it's a start. Maybe I'll plant a victory garden in the backseat.
Eventually, we're going to have to use fuel more efficiently, and then probably find other efficient ways to run our vehicles. Sept. 11 is the event that will ultimately force an American energy revolution, thus putting oil in the gutter (it's already headed there, and OPEC's whining is music to my ears). Once the oil is no longer profitable, the whole Middle East will turn into a desert full of camel-herders.
Bet Atta wasn't thinking of that when he hit the WTC with the plane.
The primary need for our country is to achieve energy independence, probably by nuclear generation of electicity. But opening the Arctic to oil production will help, and so will energy conservation.
I have a truck that guzzles gas. I don't recycle. I smoke. Detractors do not matter in my little empire as I am happy!
I do agree that Ms. Huffington seems to be moving left in her opinions, though. I used to hold her in somewhat high regard.
PS: Greetings from Indy's Castleton area!
The difference between Liberals and Conservatives, Cicero, is that Conservatives stop right there at the end of that sentence. For Liberals, the end of that sentence is a jumping-off point to calls for penalties and regulations against those who would exercise their freedom to make a "pointless" choice of which automobile to drive.
Hmmm, not so patriotic as to buy an American gas-sipping car, eh, Adrianna? Oh, that's right, there aren't any American status symbol luxury station wagons. She's a phony and a snob, IMO.
If I decide between a SUV that gets 16 MPG and a smaller (inadequate sized) car that gets 32 MPG, then my monthly expense in gasoline is going to be either $400 or $200. Out of the $200 difference (going to Texaco/Fina/Conoco etc.) about $60 to $70 is state and federal taxes, leaving about $130 to $140 to the (domestic) oil companies. So how much of that $130 is going to OPEC? I don't know. I'm more concerned with driving something that is big enough to haul my family and whatever we need to carry and to keep me from being squashed like a bug if some idiot runs into me on the road.
This may come as a shock, but we can dig for fuel. It is there. It won't decimate the landscape, this isn't 1930 when they dug up the west and beautified it with crickets. The politicians and the greens who won't let this happen, including my own Jeb Bush, are not thinking ahead. We must become energy sufficient, and we can.
At least we can reduce our dependency to managable proportions, buy from nations other than the Arabs, and save ourselves from the threat of blackmail in the form of shortages and super high prices. This should have been done after Carter left office. Does anybody remember the oil mess during his administration?
Excellent point
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.