Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A call to arms for airline passengers, Anti-hijacking movement takes flight
SF Chronicle ^ | 11-24-01 | Janine DeFao

Posted on 11/24/2001 4:24:05 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:39:06 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

If his plane is hijacked, Don Detrich wants the attackers to know he will consider it his "patriotic duty to get up from my seat and kick ass."

As founder of the fledgling Flight Watch Hijacking Resistance League, Detrich has urged airline passengers to fight back, using weapons from ballpoint pens to beverage carts. As his message has spread from his Web site to media outlets from coast to coast, he's heard from dozens of potential recruits eager to get on board.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-253 next last
Let's Roll...
1 posted on 11/24/2001 4:24:05 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let's role. NEVER REPENT TO YOUR PERSECUTOR, NO MATTER THE CONSEQUENCE, THE WTC PROVED IT.
2 posted on 11/24/2001 4:27:17 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
http://www.flightwatchol.com
3 posted on 11/24/2001 4:35:52 AM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I have recently been on four flights from California to Florida and back. I was prepared and armed. Even a little disappointed there were no hi-jackers. I really wanted to kill a couple of those turkeys.
4 posted on 11/24/2001 4:41:37 AM PST by BADJOE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Count me in. Yes it is time for good men and women to come to the aid of their flight = to their county. It is better, if you are going down to go down fighting -- take as many of the bad guys down with you as possible -- before they can do more harm.

Growing up in the South -- on the schoolyard we found the bullies back off when they find you will fight - one of the most useful lessons we learned in school.

It is simple, when the bad guys find everyone will fight them -- they are less likly to try harm.

5 posted on 11/24/2001 4:43:47 AM PST by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAY
This is why we have the 2nd amendment.
6 posted on 11/24/2001 4:47:22 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Right!
7 posted on 11/24/2001 4:49:04 AM PST by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RAY
"...Growing up in the South -- on the schoolyard we found the bullies back off when they find you will fight..."
=======================================

Yeah!!!! - -- - Hit 'em back, FIRST !! !! !!

8 posted on 11/24/2001 4:51:10 AM PST by Alabama_Wild_Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Thanks. I work for the Army as a civilian and many I work with travel every week. I have sent the Flight Watch web page to each and every one of them.
9 posted on 11/24/2001 4:52:46 AM PST by SLB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Someone should start an organization called the

Todd Beamer Society

10 posted on 11/24/2001 4:53:58 AM PST by pocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Lion Den Dan; Travis McGee; logos; Alas; harpseal; Jeff Head; the irate magistrate...
FYI
11 posted on 11/24/2001 4:55:12 AM PST by SLB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"It's a very risky proposition," Deeks said.

No, a risky proposition is relying on a 120 lb. stewardess who thinks she's a ninja after a 1-day "seminar" on hijacker defense.

12 posted on 11/24/2001 4:59:50 AM PST by randog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BADJOE
I know what you mean. I so want to get a hold of one of them and send them to allah. I have never hit anyone in my life but I could kill one of them and afterwards go home and sleep like a child.
13 posted on 11/24/2001 5:08:16 AM PST by CathyRyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pocat
Wonderful idea! Fitting memorial.
14 posted on 11/24/2001 5:49:50 AM PST by Dixielander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
--as a general rule of thumb*1, "authority figures' are always more afraid of losing authority than of having practical help in any situation. You can see it all the time. instead of just reviving the citizen militia as we have on the books for hundreds of years, the federal government is jumping through convulted (and dangerous) hoops to expand their authority, way past their constitutional boundaries.

In the case of private authority, pick an example, take the red cross, in any emergency they 'take over" become self appointed cops, you can't "help" unless you are part of their already established clique support structure, no matter your expertise or intentions.

Same with the airline "security", they only trust their own employees, the stewardii servers have just barely a handle on "controlling" passengers, they are afraid of losing that control. At the airports they "trust' some weirdo looking 'security officer' named umgallah from a foreign country WAY before they are gonna trust anyone not in their employ.

Ya, in a pinch when it's obvious they can't handle a situation, they would be forced to accept help, but before that, I doubt they would "officially" welcome it, except in the vaguest terms.

I've had a few conversations with my girlfriend on this since 9-11, she's retired skygoddess, that's her/their general viewpoint. On a low level they will accept "help" once it was obvious they can't deal with it, but before then, they really only want some official cop assigned to the flights, and perhaps their captain to be armed. They have an ingrained "us versus them" mentality as regards passengers that is very similar to cops "us versus them" mentality to civvies in general. There is about zero trust. It's weird, but there ya go.

Until the situation is so bad it's undeniable, there won't be a lot of cooperation or acceptance beyond this putting big guys on the aisle seats.

Here's another example, pure tactics, the curtain between first class and serf class, tactically they should lose it, so you can see up and down the aisles, realistically they won't lose it. Tactically, the only place for a sky marshall to sit and be effective is the very last row in the back, which means they are easy to spot by the badguys. they don' talways sit there, but most of the time they do.

Realisitically it would be better for citizens with carry permits to be armed on the planes, but, that is WAY more of a threat to the existing entrenched government than ANY terrorist attack, that's why it's not even being considered. They DESPARATELY do not want the US citizenry armed as per the second, only armed at best in a controlled, non-practical way. I mean, any fool can see quite clearly that none of the skyjackings would have occurred if there had been a dozen or more armed US citizens on each of those planes. It takes one second thought to see that, YET, this prez, any other prez, any other government-that's the very bottom of the barrel last 'solution" they can even contemplate, because it's a THREAT to their continual scam fake out running of the country. They are concerned with the continuation of their command and control, it is acceptable to them to absorb losses rather than diminish theior command. They do not want to lose the ability to threaten the citizenry, to have the citizenry jump when they bark, or to show that there's any "solution" that exists outside of "government" doing it, because although our nations setup is that the legit people here are the government, these people who work for us really, really, really do not see it or want it that way. They think a perq of the job is that they are now "massah" and you are now automatically "boy".

EVERY decision, ruling, guideline, edict, whathaveyou out of government is primarily first designed to perpetuate that "continuation of command and control" aspect, no matter the subject. That's exactly why you saw the order/authorization for a miljet shootdown in the face of another skyjacking, instead of preventing a skyjacking in advance by making it imppsible in most scenarios for a badguy or guys to take over a plane.A miljet shootdown perpetuates governmental control, armed non governmental employees just at random on the plane does zero to perpetuate that control, even though it would be WAY more effective in keeping the plane from being taken over. shootdown=crashed plane, everyone perishes, armed citizenry = no successful hijacking, any governmental employee not needed in the least. It's clear as day there.

There will never be a change in this until constitutionally-bent politicos get "elected", and that includes the bulk of the current crop, who are most definetly NOT constitutionally bent. And if you go back and look, it has made zero difference in meatworld which of the two parties are in executive branch office or in "control" of the legislative branch, none, other than in some almost unimportant ways. They are both united against the people FIRST, their mission is perpetuation of power, period. Both sides every election cycle go way out of their way to promise this or that, the results have always been no significant change back to constitutional government. there hasn't been any, all anyoner has to do is honestly LOOK, go back pretty far, just look. How they can fake people out like this for generations is beyond me. I think people are just so used to being faked out that they consider it their duty or something.

It's gonna be in a small scale reflection exactly what happens with these airlines, more governmental control and "ownership" in a practical sense. Basically, it's an entire industry that's being nationalized as we speak, but most folks won't see that or say it out loud yet. Same with "energy" that is already half way nationalised, full nationalisation is coming. Same with "healthcare", as soon as they have enough doses to start the forced vaccinations, and they will use this saying to accomplish their goal of more command and control - "you agree with us totally, 100%, or you are with the terrorists. and this will get rah rah rahed on by most people. You can see it happening already. I can guarantee I'll get flamed over this here, too. No deviation from the command and control party line is acceptable, any even small question or disagreement-different perspective is greeted with "you're a traitor, and etc, etc, go back to your terrorist buddies, you (*&^%%&**(()". No deviation in thought is acceptable, play "follow the leader" right on down the line, every single minute step, OR you are an untermenschen worthy only of extermination, one or the other.

This guy in the article understands that, he knows that his method is actually more practical, and it's actuaally closer to 'the law' as originally designed and setup, a lot of people understand that, but, they are a small minority in the population,and they will get shouted down by the mass sieg heiling, guaranteed. I wouldn't bet a penny against it.

*1--yep, said "general", so really don't need 'any-someone's' exception to the rule personal example used as a flame "proof". thanks in advance.

15 posted on 11/24/2001 6:14:54 AM PST by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
One pilots' organization is cautiously supportive, but a flight attendants' union official called Detrich's proposal "very dangerous."

HA! The brave Pilot's union is for it, and the girls and pansies of the Stew's union is against it. Kind of a microcosm of the gun debate.

16 posted on 11/24/2001 6:20:00 AM PST by Restore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Federal Aviation Administration has taken no position on passenger resistance, said spokesman Jerry Snyder. "We would caution passengers that they would be held responsible for their actions," he said.

If the FAA had done their job we'd not be having this discussion-

17 posted on 11/24/2001 6:22:40 AM PST by InkStone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zog
Oustanding commentary in #15. Thanks for posting it.
18 posted on 11/24/2001 6:27:50 AM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: zog
Realisitically it would be better for citizens with carry permits to be armed on the planes, but, that is WAY more of a threat to the existing entrenched government than ANY terrorist attack, that's why it's not even being considered. They DESPARATELY do not want the US citizenry armed as per the second, only armed at best in a controlled, non-practical way. I mean, any fool can see quite clearly that none of the skyjackings would have occurred if there had been a dozen or more armed US citizens on each of those planes.

I've held this since 9/11...just one armed citizen on each of the four planes would have saved THOUSANDS of lives. Thank you for keeping that reality alive.

19 posted on 11/24/2001 6:40:03 AM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix
I suggest carrying one of those 10 inch hot-glue sticks to smack an islam across the face with. It would sting so much he would be incapacitated for several minutes. Enough time for the woman to kick him between the legs, and for the men to give him karate chops on his neck, and have somebody throw one of those airline black blankets over his head.

We should all get together at the gate prior to boarding and have a plan and a signal, like say a number. When somebody yells 77, that means to attack the perps.

There is NO WAY any islamic perps with box cutters should be able to stops us. We will prevail over them!

20 posted on 11/24/2001 6:40:25 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson