Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Internal Revenue Service: PASTORS MUST BE ORDAINED BY THE IRS
THE TRUMPET vol. IX - Issue 6 ^ | NOV/DEC 2001 | Dr. Greg J. Dixon

Posted on 01/02/2002 12:49:04 PM PST by Fithal the Wise

The most prominent and successful certified public accountant firm in the nation today, that specializes in keeping churches out of trouble with the Internal Revenue Service, is now boldly saying to the pastors of America that they not only have to be "ordained by God, but also the IRS."

They also say that the IRS is dictating terms to the churches by declaring in clear and no uncertain terms that, "The government doesn't want your Bible, they want your checkbook!" In seminars all over the US, Chitwood and Chitwood of Chattanooga, Tennessee, is repeating this startling announcement to pastors and church leaders. Without so much as a blush, Michael Chitwood, the main speaker, says, besides the above quotes, "Pastor, if you don't get your house in order, get ready, you are going to have a jail ministry" as he practically screams out to those present as to what pastors and church leaders must do to avoid jail time and the confiscation of church property by the federal government.

Besides giving the pastor his job description, which is based on the Roman Catholic model of worship and polity, the IRS is demanding many other things that are clearly designed to make the IRS Commissioner the new head of the churches in America Some of these demands are as follows: The church must collect a Federal ID (Social Security) number from visiting evangelists, missionaries, preachers and singers before they invite them to the pulpit.

They must give a Form 1099 to any minister who receives up to $600 in a years time, which includes missionary support. If the ID is not received, the church leaders must withhold a jeopardy assessment of 39% on the spot and send it to the IRS. They must agree to the IRS definition of benevolence. They cannot deal in cash at any level, but must deposit all offerings into a checking account and write checks for every purpose. This means, of course, that the church, in order to conduct its ministry, has to have an Employer Identification Number which must be provided by the IRS by filing Form SS-4 which a true New Testament church could never do and remain obedient to her Lord. In fact, church leaders would have to misrepresent the church as a religious organization rather than a N.T. Church to do so. Other things that pastors and church leaders are required to do are to be an informer against their members and also to preach only IRS prescribed sermons. Also, all fund raising material must be submitted to the IRS for their approval.

The job description for pastors is a list of nine specific sacerdotal duties which again is a Roman Catholic definition meaning sacred. The Catholic church teaches that these sacraments, when administered by a priest, are essential to ones salvation. This is totally opposite to the Bible definition which states that baptism and communion are memorials of the death, burial and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, and that they follow salvation. The nine duties are: baptisms, weddings, serving the Eucharist (the Catholic sacrament of communion), teaching , spiritual counseling, christenings or baby dedications, administration of church affairs and the regular conducting of worship services. If the pastor does a substantial number of these things, he will receive very lucrative tax breaks. This is in clear violation of the scriptures concerning the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes which the Lord Jesus said that He hates (Rev. 2:6, 2:15). It is the setting up of a privileged class of clergy with benefits from the state that lay members do not receive. Others who minister to the church in the area of music, youth, children, education and other areas of responsibility don't qualify.

This is consistent with what officials of the IRS told Attorney David Gibbs of the Christian Law Association (CLA) in 1984 when they said that their definition of church is "once per week adult worship." They said that they did not consider such ministries as Sunday school, Christian school, busses, youth camp, vacation Bible school, nursing home, etc., to fall within their definition of the word "church". This Gibbs/IRS meeting took place in Washington, DC at the time that the so called champion of Christian liberty was hammering out a compromise with the Dole Committee (Sen. Bob Dole-R-Kansas) in the US Senate to bring the churches into compliance with the FICA tax (social security) laws. This was the deal that would eventually cause the raid and seizure of the Baptist Temple 17 years later. It's too bad that Gibbs didn't sound the alarm at that time and call the Bible believing pastors together for a summit meeting to map out a strategy that could have possibly saved our churches and ministries. The unregistered church pastors tried, but unfortunately our words fell on deaf ears. The so called "big" preachers were too busy receiving their tax deductible gifts and building their empires to be concerned over the future of God's work. Now the enemies of Christ have sprung the trap and it is too late.

These requirements should be intolerable enough by just the fact that the IRS would even dare to suggest duties for pastors, but to impose under the penalty of imprisonment and confiscation of property the same responsibilities of Roman Catholic priests is nothing short of naked tyranny. Obviously, the inquisition has returned and the pastors and churches of America are not even aware that it has arrived. The raid and seizure of the property of the Baptist Temple is the direct result of the pastors and church refusing to bow down to this new wave of Catholic terror that has come upon our land. The issue in the Baptist Temple case isn't taxes as the IRS, with the help of the media, has led the people of Indianapolis and nation to believe. The issue is very simple. Will the churches of America bow down to the IRS in violation of the first commandment, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me," or will they bow down to the Lord Jesus Christ? Our Lord said, "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon" (Matthew 6:24). The purge is now on as we hear of churches and ministries being closed on a regular basis. But there is still no evidence that the pastors have awakened from their stupor.

The benevolent requirements for churches are beyond atrocious. They are five in number: food, clothing, housing, medical emergencies and utilities. The church cannot help with transportation or auto repairs and a myriad of other things that churches have historically done on a regular basis. The church cannot make loans to the pastor, members, or others which churches have always done. Obviously, they want to make sure that the money lenders get their profits even from the poor. Can you imagine the government of the US limiting a church as to its duties in regarding charitable activity? There is no subject in the Bible that is nearer to the heart of God than charity. According to the apostle James, it is the test of pure religion (James 1:27). Paul the Apostle declares that charity is of higher value even than preaching and sacrifice (I Cor. 13:1-3). For the churches to debase such a high and noble service to Christ by submitting its administration to the wicked IRS is beyond belief. How will the preachers of America give an account of caving into this coercion by an abusive Bush administration who is continuing with the policies of those before him? How will church leaders face the Lord Jesus at the Judgment Seat of Christ when He asks them why they violated His clear commands concerning alms giving? He said, "Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men, Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly." But now the churches are required to get the permission of the IRS before helping someone other than in the manner and purpose that they approve. Then records will have to be kept for the IRS so that the publicans can make sure that the church is in fact following their guidelines. And, of course, they expect church leaders to report this alms giving to the IRS so that they can even gouge the poor for more tribute. And all of this so the churches can keep their tax exemption and the people can get their precious tax deductions for their tithes and gifts. As James Dobson's organization said when challenged, "It's just good stewardship." Thievery, good stewardship? How sad.

It may be that the churches have now gone too far. When they begin building their dynasties on the backs of the poor our Lord, no doubt, will be swift in His removal of their candlestick. He said to the church at Ephesus, "Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works: or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent" (Rev. 2:5).

All Churches Now Required to Join IRS Super Church

Two other developments concerning IRS control of churches has risen recently that should literally send shock waves through the religious community. First, while the churches are arguing doctrinal positions among themselves, and won't even spit on each other for the most part, the IRS has now developed its own super church. Independent Baptists in particular pride themselves in their anti-ecumenism. No fundamentalist preacher worth his salt would be caught dead at the local church federation meeting where he has to rub shoulders with a charismatic or liberal preacher. However, they don't think twice about paying a large fee to go to a Chitwood or CLA seminar and sit next to one of these religious outcasts to learn how to be a good IRS approved church and pastor.

It is now a fact that in order to get and keep the tax-exempt status a church must agree that all religions are equal. The new Application for Recognition of Exemption Form 1023 Schedule A for Churches (Rev. September 1998) demands a declaration to this effect with the following words at point #3: "Does the organization require prospective members to renounce other religious beliefs or their membership in other churches or religious orders to become members? Yes__ No__. If "Yes," describe."

It doesn't take much intelligence to figure out where they are going with this. In order to be considered a legal church (tax exempt) in America, the church or religious organization will have to declare that all religions are equal. They will also have to declare that they do not believe that their doctrinal position only results in converts to their faith having eternal life. They must renounce this narrow inclusivist position. Maybe we now know why Billy Graham, Robert Schuller, Pat Robertson, and other TV preachers have been making such fuzzy remarks about adherents of other religions, though sincere, going to heaven without receiving Christ. In that tax exemption is government subsidy, according to the Supreme Court in the Bob Jones University case, it is now clear that the US government will not support any religion that clings to the narrow minded belief that salvation is in Jesus Christ alone. Remember? "Come Shekels, Come Shackles." The world church isn't coming; it is already here, and the preachers don't have a clue as they go merrily along hand in hand with the Great Harlot to the wedding with the anti-Christ. (Rev. 17).

US Government Through the IRS Outlaws Preaching on Second Coming of Christ

One of the reasons the IRS gave to Texe Marr's Living Truth Ministries for removing their tax exempt status is as follows: "Much of the material you disseminate promises to address possible conspiracies or threats, either from individuals, groups or various agencies, against Christianity, freedom or other rights. This is evident from a review of your newsletters and order forms. The titles and promotional materials are designed to sensationalize and grab the readers attention. They usually imply that the works will expose certain prominent groups, individuals, politicians or government agencies as being part of or linked to some threat or conspiracy." One of the titles that the IRS gave as an example included "Bible Prophecy and The Conspiracy."

Any grade school child in Sunday School knows that you can't teach or write on Bible prophecy without dealing with the second coming of Jesus Christ. But just as the Russian pastors under communism were forbidden to speak on this subject, we are now coming to the same place in our beloved land. It is obvious that if one believes in the literal return of the Lord Jesus Christ that they will be considered a domestic terrorist. In that the Lord Jesus will destroy wicked government upon His return in great glory and break the back of Gentile world rule, this message isn't popular with the in-for-hells and the high-heeled-belles that run our country today. Of course, they don't believe that He is coming, but they believe that we who do will be involved in what they call self-fulfilled prophecies and try to hasten His coming by blowing up everything in sight. Further evidence of this type of anti-Christ thinking surfaced recently when a brochure put out by the FBI in Phoenix, Arizona, named "potential domestic terrorists" that law enforcement should be aware of. One of those groups is "Doomsday/Cult-Type." Obviously, this would include all Bible believing preachers and churches in America. We not only believe that there will be a literal doomsday, we believe that the Lord Jesus Christ will bring the doom when He comes (Rev. 6:12-17). It won't do any good to claim that your church is not a "cult". The IRS definition fits the average Bible believing church to a tee.

Many have asked if we can actually show them this in the law. Our answer is no, we can't because you won't find a specific law that says that you can't preach on the Second Coming of Jesus Christ in America today. That's because they don't have to write a law to gain the same effect. All Congress has to do is to give an outlaw agency like the IRS a carte blanche privilege of making up their own so-called laws as they go along. The churches agreed to this when they signed their tax-exempt contract. They said that they would obey all laws, federal, state and local, presently and in the future. But they apparently didn't read the fine print. The new churches filing for tax exemption must agree to the following: "The Corporation or organization shall have no power to take any action that would be required for a tax exemption under Internal Revenue

Code Section 501(c)(3) and related regulations, rulings, and procedures." It is now the "procedure" of the IRS to refuse tax exempt status to those churches that will not agree that all religions are equal and who refuse to join through tax exemption, the world church. Also, preaching on Christ's coming is taboo.

For those churches which are foolish enough to believe that Sec. 508 of the IRS code allows an automatic exemption for churches, need to read it again. It doesn't say "exemption," it says, "...churches have a mandatory exception." The exception is from filing a Form 1023 to make application for not for profit status. Here is the kicker. Churches have to abide by the same rules that those that do file for this privilege. And if they do not, the IRS can, and most assuredly will, remove their tax exemption. The only thing missing is the annual Form 990 that other religious organizations have to file. When this is required, the churches will be under total control of the IRS with no wiggle room.

In the Baptist Temple court case, the church learned that a New Testament Church does not legally exist in the US today because there are no longer any First Amendment protections left. The genius of the First Amendment and various religious freedom clauses of the fifty states is that, for the first time in history, a N. T. Church could exist legally without having in the words of the IRS a "distinct legal existence." Now even a N.T. Church will be assigned by force the legal status of an association and will be expected to meet the same standards that the not for profits have to meet. But, they still won't have their God given right of a non-taxable status. This status is in contrast to an exempt status which is a privilege not a right.

IRS Agent Says That Churches are Trapped

The evidence as to what we are saying, though denied by most preachers, was made clear on January 24 this year in Tampa, Florida. IRS agent Melvin Blough testified in federal court that "once a church obtains the status of 501(c)(3) under the IRC they are trapped. The only way to be removed from a 501(c)(3) status is if the IRS chooses to remove the exemption. So if you dissolve the corporation and continue on as ABC church, an unincorporated church, you're still trapped in their web and under their control." He further testified that a church is automatically exempt under federal law without a 501(c)(3) designation. He also stated under oath that churches request the status just to get the governments stamp of approval. Even though Blough used the word "exemption" rather than "exception," he is essentially correct in his assessment of the plight of the churches of America. It is obvious that, regardless, the result is the same.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; christianlist; christianpersecutio; religion; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last
To: Demosthenes
No, AGAIN, try to wrap your head around this: A Catholic Priest has NO SOURCE OF INCOME. They take a vow of poverty.

Incorrect, diocesan parish priests, as opposed to those belonging to Orders, do not typically take vows of poverty. They do take vows of chastity and obedience.

81 posted on 01/03/2002 1:40:05 PM PST by Fithal the Wise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Chuckster
Just one more reason to dismantle the IRS

How many reasons does that make now?
Ya see....
Hmmmm....
I lost count somewhere around reason # 356,941

God Bless
82 posted on 01/03/2002 1:43:36 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zencycler
Whatever....
83 posted on 01/03/2002 1:49:47 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
The organized religious corporations we call churches today... are a blight on the name of Jesus and the lifestyle he gave us to follow

Perhaps many churches are a blight, but that is not an excuse to avoid finding a pastor that can guide growth in faith. Since you recommend following Jesus. Regarding giving, this includes at least the spirit of Mt 12:42-44 tithing "this you ought to have done" and His praise of the widow who gave the two mites, all that she had Mt 23:23.

84 posted on 01/03/2002 2:26:09 PM PST by Fithal the Wise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
Ummm... sinky, there isn't a "Caesar" in America. Never has been. Never was intended to be.

Religious people pay taxes to the government.

Ever heard of a "figure of speech"? Caesar=government.

85 posted on 01/03/2002 2:27:51 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Demosthenes
The fact that these priests have substantial size accounts is hardly an indication that they are stealing from collection plates. Ever heard of inheritance? Unlike nuns, priests take no vow of poverty.
86 posted on 01/03/2002 4:52:40 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Demosthenes; sinkspur
Your Merrill Lynch guy has no idea what he's talking about when he says it's legal for priests to steal from the collection plate. If they report it to the IRS, then they aren't violating any TAX laws. They are, however, violating criminal law against theft. If the Catholic Church caught them at it and pressed charges, they'd be convicted. Oh, and if this broker or investment adviser actually knows of priests who are doing this and is taking the money into accounts and investing it, then HE is in violation of SEC/NASD regulations, and if caught will lose his license, whereupon it will be illegal for him to act as a broker or investment adviser. If you actually believe what this guy is telling you about the priests activities, I'd recommend getting your money out of his control pronto, and then reporting him to both Merrill Lynch and the NASD.
87 posted on 01/03/2002 5:02:46 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Ever heard of a "figure of speech"? Caesar=government.

And this is probably the most tired interpretation of scripture in the Bible, surpassed only by "judge not..."

sinkspur, you've already made your mark as Free Republic's most notorious government sycophant, but I will try to explain to you once again: that God did not set up "the government" over us in America. God gave authority, not to a man or a group of men, but to all men (and women) of this land, with the understanding that this wasn't just a responsibility of self-governing, but a stewardship. Because God also entrusted us with more freedom than has ever been enjoyed in this world for all its history. That's a stewardship that ALL of us are beholden to. And someday, God is going to hold us accountable for what we've done with it.

You get that? It's not given over to the federal government or any state government, or any member thereof. President George W. Bush isn't a "king" or a "Caesar". Congress isn't our "Parliament". Strip away their titles and they're merely men. Put there by God? What outlandish nonsense! God didn't install Bush into the White House... He merely let us choose for ourselves who would fulfill that position: no "divine office of king", got that?

This "government" derives from us, and what we allow for its identity to be. Unfortunately, human nature has let THIS government follow the normal course of history: it no longer exists to serve the people. Now it's an amalgam of collective power, focused on control of the White House, and wielding power through such questionable agencies as the IRS, the BATF, etc. That is NOT what God gave us! These are tools of power, that evil men will always be eager to seize for their own use, and no person of conscience true would ever, unhesitatingly, put their trust in such agencies or their masters.

When Jesus answered back the riddle of the Pharisees, He did NOT mean that His followers were under the authority of "Caesar" equally as they were with God. In reality, He was reminding the Jewish people of their own mistake: that they had entrusted in a god of fortresses - collective, temporal power - for their safety, rather than the God of Heaven. If they had rendered unto God first, they would not have HAD to render unto Caesar, or any foreign power, at all! The Jews were being reminded by Jesus that the yoke of bondage upon them was put there... because they had asked for it of their own free will. Just as Americans have been asked to put their faith in man's power... and have done so with little questioning.

So sinkspur, go ahead, and insist that there is a "Caesar", and render unto him before you consider rendering to God, if that is your desire. But do not come crying to us, clanking your chains in anguish, when "Caesar" also wields his might over you. You will find that he is not as forgiving or merciful as God.

88 posted on 01/03/2002 5:10:52 PM PST by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Demosthenes' "broker" is a personal friend who, apparently, makes it a practice to talk about his suspicions of his clients with other clients. IOW, he's a gossip-monger.

Personally, I don't believe half of what Demosthenes has posted here, as he admitted readily that he despises the practices of the Catholic Church.

89 posted on 01/03/2002 5:11:19 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Fithal the Wise
IMO, a tithe and offering should be a personal sacrifice of the believer, not a tax write-off. The church should avoid being subservient to the IRS in anyway.
90 posted on 01/03/2002 5:27:28 PM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
DAMN....

....THAT was good. REALLY REALLY good.

91 posted on 01/03/2002 5:48:38 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Yes, and while they're at it, they should stop being subservient to the government in the area of marriage as well. Many churches are organizing their members to campaign for "defense of marriage" laws, helping perpetuate the practice of government defining, licensing, and registering marriages. Most churches won't perform a marriage ceremony until the couple presents proof that the marriage has already been registered with and licensed by the government. I can't work up too much sympathy for such churches when they start whining about interference from the government tax collectors. Those who eagerly jump into bed with the devil have no business complaining when he gives them a great big hug and won't let go.
92 posted on 01/03/2002 5:52:20 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Fithal the Wise
Praise the Lord! I preach for free. That ought to stuff ém right up.

God Bless

Mel

93 posted on 01/03/2002 5:58:29 PM PST by melsec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Yep, another excuse for Catholic-bashing. What a sport it's become around here lately...
94 posted on 01/03/2002 6:01:34 PM PST by austinTparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I believe it. so do you. As a catholic you think every truth that has a negative impact (perceived) on your group, is inherently evil. TRUTH is not evil. Truth sets people free. Telling the truth is not catholic bashing. The day that our beloved but die-hard "rome-is-right" catholics finally admit that they have in fact (on one or two occasions) been VERY VERY wrong as followers of the TRUTH, just like the rest of us have, at times... will be the day Jesus faints at the right hand of the Father.... "Dad did you see that... they admitted THEY were wrong... WE are making progess... BIG TIME!"

All christian organizations have their evil doers. EVERY ONE.

So do the feds... Even bush supporters and appointees, god bless em everyone!

The best YOU and I can do is try and live right with God and his principles, and with each other... admitting the truth... we all do the wrong thing and need as much mercy from each other as we can muster.

You KNOW every body loves you here... but demosthenes is probably telling only half of what he knows in such a way as to NOT expose the confidences you are assuming have been violated. I got my own list... not of five or so... but several dozens and even hundreds...

So many, I cannot remember the names, but I can see the faces...

95 posted on 01/03/2002 6:10:28 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
In reality, He was reminding the Jewish people of their own mistake: that they had entrusted in a god of fortresses - collective, temporal power - for their safety, rather than the God of Heaven. If they had rendered unto God first, they would not have HAD to render unto Caesar, or any foreign power, at all!

Your interpretation of Scripture is completely and totally wrong. Jesus respected the temporal power of the state, as did Paul.

So sinkspur, go ahead, and insist that there is a "Caesar", and render unto him before you consider rendering to God, if that is your desire.

You're a silly little ingrate, DS.

Stay away from discerning Scripture. You don't know what the hell you're talking about.

96 posted on 01/03/2002 6:26:51 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
I got my own list... not of five or so... but several dozens and even hundreds...

So many, I cannot remember the names, but I can see the faces...

I'm sure. You've already expressed your dislike for organized religion, so why wouldn't you also slander those who participate in it?

You should think before you post. You've sounded a little nutty of late, particularly on this thread.

97 posted on 01/03/2002 6:32:43 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Fithal the Wise
It seems as though the IRS wants churches to NOT render unto Caesar so that they can force them to NOT render unto God. They should change the regs so that 501(c)(3) is an opt-IN for churches. Were I a church leader, I sure as heck would rather pay all taxes so that I could run my church as I see fit. According to the Bible, Jesus apparently provided for such a thing: "Render unto Caesar..."
98 posted on 01/03/2002 6:40:08 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Render to Caesar, pastor Dixon.

Uh, hate to be the one to break the news to you, but this is America and we don't have a freakin' "Caesar".

Just thought I'd point that out. I hate how often that quote is used out of context.

99 posted on 01/03/2002 6:40:51 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You're a silly little ingrate, DS.

Have been called worse. By a far better class of person. I can respect them. I can't respect you.

Is this really the best you can do, sinkspur?

Stay away from discerning Scripture. You don't know what the hell you're talking about.

No more than you do, sir.

100 posted on 01/03/2002 6:56:12 PM PST by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson