Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

King Family is Selling Out Martin's Legacy
Ramblings of a Black Conservative ^ | December 2001 | by Michael King

Posted on 01/07/2002 12:50:58 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie

"I'm going to King-Land, King-Land; in Atlanta, G-A, I'm going to King-Land..."

- with apologies to singer Paul Simon.

It appears that the family of slain civil rights giant Martin Luther King, Jr. is looking for more ways to milk the King name for as much money as humanly possible. At this rate, I wouldn't be surprised if a theme park in Atlanta is in the offing. The King family would be able to charge as much as an admission to Disney World, and be able to pocket the majority of it.

The federal government has authorized the construction of a monument to King on the National Mall in Washington. It's planned to go between the Jefferson and Lincoln Memorials. The honor is a supremely high one given the sheer number of memorials in the National Capitol Region compared them to the small number given the highest honor of placement on the National Mall - the "front yard" for the White House and U.S. Capitol. Individuals with this honor are among the most revered leaders of our nation's history.

The descendants of those other honorees have not done what the King family has had the audacity to do - demand payment for the "right" to use King's image, likeness and name. King's widow, Coretta Scott King, appears to have made a profession at being a widow in mourning, and used that stature to milk as much money as possible for herself and her family from an unsuspecting public. Her son, Dexter, heads up the Atlanta-based King Center for Non-Violent Social Change; a poorly-run group that appears to do little more than to act as caretaker for anything and anyone using King's name - as long as they pay enough money for it.

In 1995, the King family shut down the King holiday commission - which Coretta Scott King herself spent years trying to establish. Family members allegedly believed the commission was a fundraising competitor.1 And, of course, they wanted to make sure that any dollars that were raised in King's name came into their own coffers.

The King family demanded a payment from the Library of Congress of up to $20 million for the "right" to archive King's papers. The Library balked at the fee, and rightfully so. The Library seldom pays for materials, and has never paid such a large sum for any item in its inventory.

French telecommunications giant Alcatel paid the family an undisclosed sum to use King's image in a television ad which used computer graphics to manipulate the scene around the Lincoln Memorial to make it appear as if King were speaking to no one as opposed to the real masses gathered at the 1963 March on Washington. Cingular Wireless also paid the King family an undisclosed sum to use a portion of King's "I Have A Dream" speech in a cellular telephone ad that included quotes from Kermit the Frog and Homer Simpson.3 These ads have done little more than to turn King into a corporate shill, for sale to the highest bidder by relatives who want to pad their high-on-the-hog lifestyle.

Congress granted King's fraternity, Alpha Phi Alpha, the right and authority to lead the memorial project. It gave the group a 2003 deadline to raise $100 million and break ground for the monument.4 The King family has reportedly demanded that it receive a portion of any and all monies donated to the memorial effort, as part of a "permissions agreement." 5 A number of companies and individuals have already donated monies to the project. General Motors, for instance, has given $750,000 for the construction. GM indicated a larger financial gift would follow, but those plans were put on hold after the King family's demands became publicly known.

A design for the memorial has been selected from a field of more than 900 candidates. The final plan, by San Francisco-based Roma Design Group, includes a depiction of King's profile along with some of his writings carved within a "stone of hope."7 It is a fitting tribute to a man who wished for no memorial to his legacy; who only wanted men to be judged by the content of their character.

Unfortunately, because of the efforts to snatch money from the project by the King family, we may not see the majestic memorial to a great man on the National Mall. Of course, if they build an amusement park, a la Walt Disney, we may get to see a statue of King - between the water slide, the roller coaster and the hot dog stand. Just don't get any mustard on his shoes.


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/07/2002 12:50:59 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie (byron_the_aussie@yahoo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
This is news? It seems it's been going on for about 30 years.
2 posted on 01/07/2002 12:53:20 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Hey, King is making more money dead than Jesse is making alive......
3 posted on 01/07/2002 1:17:13 PM PST by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Please allow me to be the first to post a non-politically-correct comment. I am sick and tired of finding a Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd in every city in every state. I disagree with his statute being on the Mall and I will never attend any event or facility which charges admission which goes to his family. Same goes for his clone, JJ. All exploit their own people for personal renumeration.
4 posted on 01/07/2002 1:19:36 PM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
....her son, Dexter, heads up the Atlanta-based King Center for Non-Violent Social Change....

Have the King families' foundations ever been audited by the IRS, do you know?

5 posted on 01/07/2002 1:28:43 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
And that legacy would be? Woman, wine and plagerism?
6 posted on 01/07/2002 1:37:58 PM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Cingular Wireless also paid the King family an undisclosed sum to use a portion of King's "I Have A Dream" speech in a cellular telephone ad that included quotes from Kermit the Frog and Homer Simpson.3 These ads have done little more than to turn King into a corporate shill, for sale to the highest bidder by relatives who want to pad their high-on-the-hog lifestyle.

What's really funny about this is that a large part of the 'I have a dream' speech was 'borrowed' by King from an earlier speech given by a black minister at the 1952 Republican convention. Little of what King wrote was his own. His Ph.D. thesis was plagiarized, as were several of his later writings. Any lawyerly types know if you can copyright a peice of text you've stolen from someone else?

The Martin Luther King plagiarism page

8 posted on 01/07/2002 1:46:36 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
And that legacy would be? Woman, wine and plagerism?

Hardly. Whatever King's vices of the flesh, they paled before his vices of the mind and spirit. He was a very successful revolutionary. In his assault on the American tradition, he, and those he worked with, managed to bring together many rival factions on the far left, in one monolithic movement. To those who had not followed the machinations of the Left, that March On Washington may have looked like a vast spontaneous outpouring. But to those who knew who was who, it represented the most successful rallying of the various factions of the Far Left ever seen in America.

They all used King as a rallying point; and he was perfectly happy to be so used. It should surprise no one that his family, lacking his charisma to play the same role, would still find a practical way to cash in on it.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

9 posted on 01/07/2002 1:52:56 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
How accurate you are. Too bad this individual is regarded by many as some sort of hero. The real truth about him is totally suppressed.
10 posted on 01/07/2002 3:04:33 PM PST by afz400
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afz400
I believe the real truth about him is this.

He was killed, not because he was leading blacks somewhere important. But because he was stopping them from going somewhere. He had gained enought notoriety and influence that many blacks were listening to him.

He instructed the blacks to protest the War in Vietnam by not enlisting. A majority of the military force was being made up of young blacks enlisting.

Plans had been made, money had been spent, weapons were being bought, and now the players weren't going to show up ! Can't have that ! ! ! !

OFF the distractor !!! Put a new ringmaster in place. One that we already have in our pocket. One that is greedy and lustful. (yep, you guessed it, J.J.)

Well, it worked. The poverty pimps have been running the Soul Circus ever since ! ! ! ! ! !

11 posted on 01/07/2002 3:21:58 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson