Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jefferson Davis' Inaugurual Address
sunsite.utk.edu ^ | Feb. 18, 1861 | Jeff Davis

Posted on 02/19/2002 3:18:50 PM PST by Dawgsquat

Davis--Inaugural Address

Inaugurual Address
as Provisional President of the Confederacy

[Montgomery, February 18, 1861 ]

GENTLEMEN OF THE CONGRESS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA, FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:

Called to the difficult and responsible station of Chief Executive of the Provisional Government which you have instituted, I approach the discharge of the duties assigned to me with an humble distrust of my abilities, but with a sustaining confidence in the wisdom of those who are to guide and to aid me in the administration of public affairs, and an abiding faith in the virtue and patriotism of the people.

Looking forward to the speedy establishment of a permanent government to take the place of this, and which by its greater moral and physical power will be better able to combat with the many difficulties which arise from the conflicting interests of separate nations, I enter upon the duties of the office to which I have been chosen with the hope that the beginning of our career as a Confederacy may not be obstructed by hostile opposition to our enjoyment of the separate existence and independence which we have asserted, and, with the blessing of Providence, intend to maintain. Our present condition, achieved in a manner unprecedented in the history of nations, illustrates the American idea that governments rest upon the consent of the governed, and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish governments whenever they become destructive of the ends for which they were established .

The declared purpose of the compact of Union from which we have withdrawn was "to establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity;" and when, in the judgment of the sovereign States now composing this Confederacy, it had been perverted from the purposes for which it was ordained, and had ceased to answer the ends for which it was established, a peaceful appeal to the ballot-box declared that so far as they were concerned, the government created by that compact should cease to exist. In this they merely asserted a right which the Declaration of Independence of 1776 had defined to be inalienable; of the time and occasion for its exercise, they, as sovereigns, were the final judges, each for itself. The impartial and enlightened verdict of mankind will vindicate the rectitude of our conduct, and He who knows the hearts of men will judge of the sincerity with which we labored to preserve the Government of our fathers in its spirit. The right solemnly proclaimed at the birth of the States, and which has been affirmed and reaffirmed in the bills of rights of States subsequently admitted into the Union of 1789, undeniably recognize in the people the power to resume the authority delegated for the purposes of government. Thus the sovereign States here represented proceeded to form this Confederacy, and it is by abuse of language that their act has been denominated a revolution. They formed a new alliance, but within each State its government has remained, the rights of person and property have not been disturbed. The agent through whom they communicated with foreign nations is changed, but this does not necessarily interrupt their international relations.

Sustained by the consciousness that the transition from the former Union to the present Confederacy has not proceeded from a disregard on our part of just obligations, or any failure to perform every constitutional duty, moved b! no interest or passion to invade the rights of others, anxious to cultivate peace and commerce with all nations, if we may not hope to avoid war, we may at least expect that posterity will acquit us of having needlessly engaged in it. Doubly justified by the absence of wrong on our part, and by wanton aggression on the part of others, there can be no cause to doubt that the courage and patriotism of the people of the Confederate States will be found equal to any measures of defense which honor and security may require.

An agricultural people, whose chief interest is the export of a commodity required in every manufacturing country, our true policy is peace, and the freest trade which our necessities will permit. It is alike our interest, and that of all those to whom we would sell and from whom we would buy, that there should be the fewest practicable restrictions upon the interchange of commodities. There can be but little rivalry between ours and any manufacturing or navigating community, such as the Northeastern States of the American Union. It must follow, therefore, that a mutual interest would invite good will and kind offices. If, however, passion or the lust of dominion should cloud the judgment or inflame the ambition of those States, we must prepare to meet the emergency and to maintain, by the final arbitrament of the sword, the position which we have assumed among the nations of the earth. We have entered upon the career of independence, and it must be inflexibly pursued. Through many years of controversy with our late associates, the Northern States, we have vainly endeavored to secure tranquillity, and to obtain respect for the rights to which we were entitled. As a necessity, not a choice, we have resorted to the remedy of separation; and henceforth our energies must he directed to the conduct of our own affairs, and the perpetuity of the Confederacy which we have formed. If a just perception of mutual interest shall permit us peaceably to pursue our separate political career, my most earnest desire will have been fulfilled. But, if this be denied to us, and the integrity of our territory and jurisdiction be assailed, it will but remain for us, with firm resolve, to appeal to arms and invoke the blessings of Providence on a just cause.

As a consequence of our new condition and with a view to meet anticipated wants, it will be necessary to provide for the speedy and efficient organization of branches of the executive department, having special charge of foreign intercourse, finance, military affairs, and the postal service.

For purposes of defense, the Confederate States may, under ordinary circumstances, rely mainly upon their militia, but it is deemed advisable, in the present condition of affairs, that there should be a well-instructed and disciplined army, more numerous than would usually be required on a peace establishment. I also suggest that for the protection of our harbors and commerce on the high seas a navy adapted to those objects will be required. These necessities have doubtless engaged the attention of Congress.

With a Constitution differing only from that of our fathers in so far as it is explanatory of their well-known intent, freed from the sectional conflicts which have interfered with the pursuit of the general welfare it is not unreasonable to expect that States from which we have recently parted may seek to unite their fortunes with ours under the government which we have instituted. For this your Constitution makes adequate provision; but beyond this, if I mistake not the judgment and will of the people, a reunion with the States from which we have separated is neither practicable nor desirable. To increase the power, develop the resources, and promote the happiness of a confederacy, it is requisite that there should be so much of homogeneity that the welfare of every portion shall be the aim of the whole. Where this does not exist, antagonisms are engendered which must and should result in separation.

Actuated solely by the desire to preserve our own rights and promote our own welfare, the separation of the Confederate States has been marked by no aggression upon others and followed by no domestic convulsion. Our industrial pursuits have received no check. The cultivation of our fields has progressed as heretofore, and even should we be involved in war there would be no considerable diminution in the production of the staples which have constituted our exports and in which the commercial world has an interest scarcely less than our own. This common interest of the producer and consumer can only be interrupted by an exterior force which should obstruct its transmission to foreign markets-a course of conduct which would be as unjust toward us as it would be detrimental to manufacturing and commercial interests abroad. Should reason guide the action of the Government from which we have separated, a policy so detrimental to the civilized world, the Northern States included, could not be dictated by even the strongest desire to inflict injury upon us; but otherwise a terrible responsibility will rest upon it, and the suffering of millions will bear testimony to the folly and wickedness of our aggressors. In the meantime there will remain to us, besides the ordinary means before suggested, the well-known resources for retaliation upon the commerce of an enemy.

Experience in public stations, of subordinate grade to this which your kindness has conferred, has taught me that care and toil and disappointment are the price of official elevation. You will see many errors to forgive, many deficiencies to tolerate, but you shall not find in me either a want of zeal or fidelity to the cause that is to me highest in hope and of most enduring affection. Your generosity has bestowed upon me an undeserved distinction, one which I neither sought nor desired. Upon the continuance of that sentiment and upon your wisdom and patriotism I rely to direct and support me in the performance of the duty required at my hands.

We have changed the constituent parts, but not the system of our Government. The Constitution formed by our fathers is that of these Confederate States, in their exposition of it, and in the judicial construction it has received, we have a light which reveals its true meaning.

Thus instructed as to the just interpretation of the instrument, and ever remembering that all offices are but trusts held for the people, and that delegated powers are to be strictly construed, I will hope, by due diligence in the performance of my duties, though I may disappoint your expectations, yet to retain, when retiring, something of the good will and confidence which welcome my entrance into office.

It is joyous, in the midst of perilous times, to look around upon a people united in heart, where one purpose of high resolve animates and actuates the whole-where the sacrifices to be made are not weighed in the balance against honor and right and liberty and equality. Obstacles may retard, they cannot long prevent the progress of a movement sanctified by its justice, and sustained by a virtuous people. Reverently let us invoke the God of our fathers to guide and protect us in our efforts to perpetuate the principles which, by his blessing, they were able to vindicate, establish and transmit to their posterity, and with a continuance of His favor, ever gratefully acknowledged, we may hopefully look forward to success, to peace, and to prosperity.


Source: CSA, Congressional Journal, 1:64-66, as reprinted in Lynda L. Crist and Mary S. Dix, eds., The Papers of Jefferson Davis (Baton Rouge, Louisana: LSU Press, 1992), 7:46-50.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dixielist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
Jefferson Davis's Farewell to the U.S. Senate January 21, 1861

Jefferson Davis' First Message to the C.S. Congress

1 posted on 02/19/2002 3:18:50 PM PST by Dawgsquat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dawgsquat;shuckmaster
bttt
2 posted on 02/19/2002 6:16:56 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ligeia;CWRWinger;stainlessbanner;Colt .45; archy;4ConservativeJustices;HELLRAISER II; aomagrat...
The right man in the right place
3 posted on 02/20/2002 12:25:54 AM PST by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
"Our present condition, achieved in a manner unprecedented in the history of nations, illustrates the American idea that governments rest upon the consent of the governed, and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish governments whenever they become destructive of the ends for which they were established."

Bump.

4 posted on 02/20/2002 3:17:55 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dawgsquat
this is the sort of thing that I will never learn in High School. They're all trying to convince how awful people like Davis were.. nothing of this sort.
5 posted on 02/20/2002 3:30:00 AM PST by katherineisgreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawgsquat
"The right solemnly proclaimed at the birth of the States, and which has been affirmed and reaffirmed in the bills of rights of States subsequently admitted into the Union of 1789, undeniably recognize in the people the power to resume the authority delegated for the purposes of government."
6 posted on 02/20/2002 4:20:48 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
Thanks for the bump Shuck - 1st Inagural Address of the CSA over my morning coffee. I love it.
7 posted on 02/20/2002 5:17:59 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
YEP!
8 posted on 02/20/2002 8:44:31 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: all
If you study all three speechs, it's clear that the reasons for secession were very much States Rights issues (that includes the hot button, emotional issue of slavery).

This war resulted in the death of the Tenth Ammendment of the Bill of Rights.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
9 posted on 02/20/2002 8:59:32 AM PST by Dawgsquat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dawgsquat
The civil war destroyed the 10th amendment alright, and it also destroyed the true intent of this constitutional republic as well. Lincoln as far as I have ascertained was a traitor to that document. Whereas the Confederacy had the right to do what they did.

Sad, sad times those were, saw the destruction of the south, and of the constitution as our founding fathers wrote it.
10 posted on 02/20/2002 9:09:56 AM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Yes, very sad times. The violations of the Tenth began several years before the war with the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850. Both were mis-guided attempts by the Feds to solve a problem that, according to the Constitution, they had no jurisdiction over. The South could see the handwriting on the wall.
11 posted on 02/20/2002 9:20:23 AM PST by Dawgsquat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Dawgsquat
State's rights was not the central philosophical (other than slavery) justification for secession. As the address indicates, Davis relied on a compact theory to justify secession. States rights was too subversive, hence the CSA Constitution did not provide for the right of secession!

In fact, Davis and his cohorts had all fought the states rights of Northern states during the 1850s to enact personal liberty laws on the grounds that such laws wrongly trampled on Federal authority!

13 posted on 02/20/2002 10:39:14 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
"State's rights was not the central philosophical (other than slavery) justification for secession. As the address indicates, Davis relied on a compact theory to justify secession. States rights was too subversive, hence the CSA Constitution did not provide for the right of secession!"

The violation of that "compact" between the Feds and the States was a States Rights issue. The Confederate Constitution did not forbid secession either, just like the U.S. Constitution did not.

"In fact, Davis and his cohorts had all fought the states rights of Northern states during the 1850s to enact personal liberty laws on the grounds that such laws wrongly trampled on Federal authority!"

"I well remember an occasion when Massachusetts was arraigned before the bar of the Senate, and when the doctrine of coercion was rife, and to be applied against her, because of the rescue of a fugitive slave in Boston. My opinion then was the same that it is now. Not in a spirit of egotism, but to show that I am not influenced in my opinions because the case is my own, I refer to that time and that occasion as containing the opinion which I then entertained, and on which my present conduct is based. I then said that if Massachusetts -- following her purpose through a stated line of conduct -- chose to take the last step, which separates her from the Union, it is her right to go, and I will neither vote one dollar nor one man to coerce her back; but I will say to her, Godspeed, in memory of the kind associations which once existed between her and the other States."

14 posted on 02/20/2002 11:25:26 AM PST by Dawgsquat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Frankly, this address is one of the most convoluted statements I've ever read. I do not deny that the southern states had and should have had the right to determine their own futures outside the Union, but if this represents the way Jefferson Davis wrote and spoke, then even by the flowery standards of 19th century oratory, he was an incredible windbag.

Furthermore, the central issue of the dispute between the northern and southern states was not preservation of slavery in the south. Only a minority of radicals in the north were actually pushing for complete abolition. Instead, the issue was whether slavery would be literally forced on the new territories and soon-to-be states in the west. The majority of people in those areas did not want slavery, and industry and labor in the north saw slavery as unfair and immoral competition. Equal accession of slave and free states was forced on the expanding United States in order maintain an even division of slave vs. free state representation in the Senate, and thereby maintain a level of power which their small population would otherwise not support, until Kansas and Nebraska upset that balance.

Secession, war, and eventual defeat stemmed from the desire of the slave holders to expand and spread their "peculiar institution". Appeals to the higher principles of "States' Rights" and "Freedom" were a thin cover for the fact that once the south could no longer get its way on the forcible extension of slavery, they decided to quit the Union altogether.

Whether they had the right to do so is a separate question. But I refuse attribute a high moral purpose to people who felt it was not only correct to hold humans as chattle but desirable to forcibly spread that practice to places where it was not wanted.

PS: The first shots of that war were fired by the south. Try shooting some artillery at Fort Bragg or Fort Campbell today and see how the Federal government reacts.

15 posted on 02/20/2002 11:35:09 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dawgsquat
.. we have vainly endeavored to secure tranquillity, and to obtain respect for the rights to which we were entitled.

Obviousy, either the term "rights" or "we" had a limited context.

16 posted on 02/20/2002 11:36:57 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
bump
17 posted on 02/20/2002 11:39:59 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dawgsquat
Funny, wasn't it John C. Calhoun (a southerner) who did much to make and break the Missouri Compromise?
18 posted on 02/20/2002 11:40:33 AM PST by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dawgsquat
Funny, wasn't it John C. Calhoun (a southerner) who did much to make and break the Missouri Compromise?
19 posted on 02/20/2002 11:41:13 AM PST by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: katana
Oh, come on, Slavery was a minor issue if at all for the civil war. To the victors go the writing of history. Lincoln took on the call for the abolishment of slavery AFTER the war had already started to give him the moral high for his illegal and unconstitutional war.

Slavery WAS NOT a major issue, and this is provable by the fact that a number of slaveholding states stayed in the union, if, as you say the war was about slavery, then those states would have joined the confederacy.

And also, for your information, the emancipation proclamation freed NO SLAVES, NOT ONE!! Lincoln stated that those slaves held in the south, which he had ZERO authority over were free, but those slaves that were held in the north were to remain slaves. SO get off you slave high horse, it's a red herring. The civil war was about states rights, and that's ALL.... read it and tell me that isn't what it says.
20 posted on 02/20/2002 12:19:56 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson