Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brave New World V2.0
Enter Stage Right ^ | April 22, 2002 | Steven Martinovich

Posted on 04/22/2002 10:31:59 AM PDT by gordgekko

Our Posthuman Future
Consequences of the biotechnology revolution
By Francis Fukuyama
Farrar, Straus and Giroux
256 pgs. US$25/C$39.95
ISBN: 0-374-23643-7

Brave New World V2.0

By Steven Martinovich
web posted April 22, 2002

It would appear that history has not, in fact, ground to a halt. Back in 1989, social philosopher Francis Fukuyama made the extraordinary claim that because "the major alternatives to liberal democracy had exhausted themselves," history had effectively come to an end. Ten years later, he backpedaled by announcing that history wasn't at an end because science continued to make progress. Fukuyama picks up that thread in Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution with a compellingly argued new thesis.

Ostensibly focusing on advances in science, at its core Our Posthuman Future expends much of its efforts on exploring the concept of human nature and how our understanding of it has changed through the millennia. Fukuyama grounds his theory of human nature in the concept of "natural rights," favored by America's Founding Fathers for their Declaration of Independence and constitution, but since dismissed as outmoded - wrongly in his opinion - by academics and philosophers. Fukuyama argues that there is such a thing as human nature, ill defined as it is, and the fact that we all share it guarantees our equality. The spread of biotechnology, neuropharmacology and even a radical increase in our lifespan threatens who we are as human beings.

Fukuyama argues that our liberal democracy is a construct of our human nature and that the reason why the system is so successful is that it has best met the needs of humanity. The problem, according to Fukuyama, is that potential advances in biotechnology promise to change human nature. Our political systems, therefore, will have to adapt to a new humanity. Instead of our benign society, he argues, we will leap into an uncertain future filled with genetic class warfare and the end of our brand of humanity.

If Fukuyama is right, our future will be more Aldous Huxley than George Orwell. Humanity will attain, writes Fukuyama, a "soft tyranny envisioned in Brave New World, in which everyone is healthy and happy but has forgotten the meaning of hope, fear, or struggle." We will be healthier, artificially mentally adjusted, live longer and demonstrably different from even our recent ancestors. Changing our very essence, argues Fukuyama, will create this posthuman.

Fukuyama's arguments are convincing if you believe that the advances in biotechnology that he fears are even possible. As Colin Tudge pointed out in last year's The Impact of the Gene: From Mendel's Peas to Designer Babies, even in theory it's difficult to constructing a "better" human being. While it is technically possible to create a designer baby, nothing is impossible after all, Tudge argued that it won't likely be very feasible considering the monumental challenge of understanding the millions, perhaps even billions, of genetic factors that influence a single variable like intelligence.

Fukuyama and Tudge both agree, however, that it would be a mistake for humans to begin tinkering with their genes. It took over five million years for the modern human being to evolve and given that we can never have absolute knowledge, modifying the genes of our descendants meddles with processes we do not completely understand and may bring repercussions we may be regret decades or centuries down the line.

To that end, Fukuyama argues that immediate legislative action is needed to halt this slide into posthumanness. Reproductive cloning must be immediately banned, pre-implementation diagnosis and screening must be regulated and only genetic therapy - not enhancement - should be permitted. Although he attempts to straddle the line between the free market and increased government intervention, it is clear that Fukuyama believes biotechnology should be placed in the same class as biological and nuclear weapons. If he's right, biotechnology is even more dangerous as the other two would allow us to die as what we are, human beings.

Steven Martinovich is a freelance writer in Sudbury, Ontario.

Buy Francis Fukuyama's Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution at Amazon.com for only $17.50 (30% off)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: biotechnology; cloning; geneticengineering; longetivity; naturalrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: longshadow
Guano: "You're gonna have to answer to the Cocoa Cola company!"

Muffley: You mean, people could actually stay down there for a hundred years?

Strangelove: It would not be difficult mein Fuhrer! Nuclear reactors could, heh ... I'm sorry. Mr. President. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely. Greenhouses could maintain plantlife. Animals could be bred and slaughtered. A quick survey would have to be made of all the available mine sites in the country. But I would guess... that ah, dwelling space for several hundred thousands of our people could easily be provided.

Muffley: Well I ... I would hate to have to decide.. who stays up and ... who goes down.

Strangelove: Well, that would not be necessary Mr. President. It could easily be accomplished with a computer. And a computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills. Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition. [Slams down left fist. Right arm rises in stiff Nazi salute.] Arrrrr! [Restrains right arm with left.] Naturally, they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time, and little to do. But ah with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present gross national product within say, twenty years.


21 posted on 04/23/2002 5:55:17 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Stranglove: [snip] "But ah with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present gross national product within say, twenty years."

Gen. Buck Turgison: "But, Doctor, wouldn't that require abandonment of the so-called monogamous relationship?"

22 posted on 04/23/2002 7:26:44 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
Gen. Buck Turgison: "But, Doctor, wouldn't that require abandonment of the so-called monogamous relationship?"

Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious ... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

23 posted on 04/24/2002 3:50:46 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
Strangelove:
Sir -- [stands up out of his wheelchair] -- I have a plan -- [pauses, realizing that he is standing] -- Mein Fuhrer, I can walk!
24 posted on 04/24/2002 10:21:44 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Sir -- [stands up out of his wheelchair] -- I have a plan -- [pauses, realizing that he is standing] -- Mein Fuhrer, I can walk!

Thank you for that inspirational moment.

[strains of "We'll Meet Again on a Sunny Day" are heard in background, as flashes of nuclear weapon detonations fill the screen.]

25 posted on 04/24/2002 11:27:14 AM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; all
I hope the lurkers on the thread enjoyed this as much as we did.
26 posted on 04/24/2002 12:19:18 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson