Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Testimony costs flight attendant her job
SignOnSanDiego ^ | July 12, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 07/12/2002 7:06:01 AM PDT by MizSterious

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 761-780 next last
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Most people--yes, but this site has gotten so liberal, that no one thinks there should be consequences. It's the "victim culture" and it's kinda sick--but more common than it used to be.
41 posted on 07/12/2002 8:03:16 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Thanks. I've only been able to find one warrant on the home phone numbers and it doesn't specify who's number it is.

I'm wondering why if they believed this to be a kidnapping, they waited until the 12th for the 'trap & trace'. Also, the 'pen register' (calls from that number) start on the 17th.

Like I said, I'm confused!

42 posted on 07/12/2002 8:04:04 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Good questions, and one can wonder about dot connections--such as the rumors that Damon and Brenda are splitsville--maybe Damon's taking up with Du Knees and planning on moving to FL once all this is over?
43 posted on 07/12/2002 8:05:40 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
And the War on Drugs keeps marching on, taking yet another casualty..
44 posted on 07/12/2002 8:07:17 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Kemal said she was just answering questions posed to her during Westerfield's trial because "I want to make sure he gets convicted."

"Because of him, it's just ruined everyone's lives," she said.

Sooooo, she's just mad because got caught BREAKING the company rules and the law. It's Westerfield's fault she smoked maui-waui because?

45 posted on 07/12/2002 8:08:07 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Police seemed a day late and a dollar short on a number of things. They didn't collect Danielle's closet doors until almost three weeks after she disappeared, they didn't fully process the house as a crime scene EVER, although they did come back an about 2 weeks to do more searching (after the evidence could have been removed, tampered with or ruined). Stinky case.

46 posted on 07/12/2002 8:08:10 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; All
My post from the other thread.......

Today's edition of the North County Times is not yet on their website, but I am a subscriber.

I will type/post two paragraphs from today's article titled "Affidavits Detail Remarks from Westerfield". I found it interesting.

Westerfield also attracted suspicion because in conversations with detectives he mentioned that Damon van Dam and Danielle were going to an upcoming father-daughter dance.

"Only Danielle van Dam could have told him about the dance and only after she had been abducted," police write in one of the affidavits.

This is a good example of their wish to pin everything on him. What a foolish deduction !!!

We have now heard that perhaps Brenda van Dam told DW about it. So how could police have decided that the ONLY way he knew it was from the child herself.

This is another example of customizing interpretations to fit the suspect they want it to fit. It's very disturbing, IMO.

47 posted on 07/12/2002 8:08:36 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Well, I'm sure you'll find someone here who will insist he did. Not only that, but he held them at gunpoint and forced them to swing!

I once had a client that came into a session drunk as a skunk..she said she had not been drinking someone stopped her on the street and poured it down her throat against her will...

Addicts (sex, gambling and drug) all think alike..they are all victims..

Remember her indignation when it was suggested that she and BVD had lesbian sex? .OH no it was more of a swap. As if she was discussing having DVD mow her lawn

BTW is any reason given for the split?

48 posted on 07/12/2002 8:09:01 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Yeah she likes to serve... never mind.
49 posted on 07/12/2002 8:09:27 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Most people I know would not be worrying about themselves while trying to help police find their missing little girl.

From what I know of you south you do NOT have any "friends" like this..

50 posted on 07/12/2002 8:11:06 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I think that Southwest should re-hire Denise.She did the RIGHT thing(her testimony)!!!
51 posted on 07/12/2002 8:12:29 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
Please note, this theory is tamer than those theories noted about..ie:barbara suffocating danielle..

He may not have known how easy it would be for him. He probably believed that there was a babysitter that night, per his conversatin with brenda. I'm sure he didn't expect the babysitter to know the alarm codes...that might have been sheer luck on his part. (btw It is possible that bvd's conversations in their entirety with DW isn't known because mudd could have limited the release of htat info)

WRT: the computer....maybe he thought he wouldn't get caught...wouldn't surprise me. There is speculation that his son neal collected the illegal child porn and stored it in his dad's home office...automatically assuming that neal's the killer and not DW.

52 posted on 07/12/2002 8:12:53 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
"She doesn't get it - if she had been at home where she belonged that night she would still have a job."

LOL...yep women belong at home. What did she think she was doing, leaving the house like that?

53 posted on 07/12/2002 8:13:01 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
From what I know of you south you do NOT have any "friends" like this..

You're sure right about that......... : *)

54 posted on 07/12/2002 8:13:35 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Hey -- I was just thinking about rats. Actually about barking dogs, or rather a city I was in for a while where there were hardly any barking dogs. Eventually I figured out why. It was all the rats. The dogs would go out in the twilight and feast on rats. Well fed dogs don't bark.

Somehow that seems related to San Diego ...

55 posted on 07/12/2002 8:14:46 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
A child was missing by force, that's evidence...and he's a member (or was) of mensa. I'm sure he figured out how to put on gloves and get rid of shoes.

Maybe HAZMAT DAVE was carrying a plastic sheet to wrap Danielle in or he owns a big @$$ed PLASTI-WRAP machine ?

56 posted on 07/12/2002 8:16:21 AM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I think it's really neat the way some people ignore evidence that is not convienent. Really. WHAT ABOUT THE UNIDENTIFIED FINGERPRINTS AND DNA?
57 posted on 07/12/2002 8:16:56 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The same logic was used by Glennie Nasland for not telling LE that David was drunk. Sorry, I forgot Glennie is obstructing justice, while DvD and DK are filtering out the unnecessary.
58 posted on 07/12/2002 8:18:37 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bvw
San Diego....????Makes me wonder how many of the jurors
1. Approve of swinging
2. Approve of a little "POT"
3. Are MH enthusiast
4. Are family people

DO we have any kind of profile of the jury?
59 posted on 07/12/2002 8:18:40 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Well, like my dad used to say, that's one of the benefits of free speech: when even the fools are permitted to speak out, it brands them for what they are so that we may avoid their company.

What bothers me, though, is that some of these might one day sit on a jury.
60 posted on 07/12/2002 8:21:20 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 761-780 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson