Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/30/2002 6:05:13 AM PDT by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JameRetief
If anybody else tries to use the word "of," they'll be hearing from my legal department!
2 posted on 07/30/2002 6:12:47 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JameRetief
the
3 posted on 07/30/2002 6:14:24 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JameRetief
inside inside inside inside inside inside

There, I feel better now.

6 posted on 07/30/2002 6:23:59 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JameRetief
McDonalds owns "Smile" ®
8 posted on 07/30/2002 7:33:02 AM PDT by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JameRetief
In previous years Intel has tried to establish lasting trademarks for letters of the alphabet - "i" - and for numbers e.g. 486.

How about Porsche's use of the "9xx" series... 911, 928, 944, 968, etc.?
Is that not a trademark?

12 posted on 07/30/2002 7:48:35 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JameRetief
I've registered the trademark for the symbol " ® " From now on it will have to be shown as " ® ® " Coca-Cola, McDonald's, GE, Intel.... meet my attorneys! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
22 posted on 07/30/2002 8:39:14 AM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JameRetief
The story of Intel vs AMD is a long one full of 1/2 truths on both sides.
The trash printed by The Register is just trash and full of insider information which is seldom correct.

The issue of trademarks is one which is fought daly by all corporations as if you fail to protect it, you loose it. Based on a court decision, this is WHY Intel couldn't trademark 80486 or i486.

BTW, the word "Athlon" is trademarked by a bathroom partion manufacture to which I'm sure AMD is working hard to resolve.

26 posted on 07/30/2002 11:58:56 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JameRetief
"Then it tried to trademark the expression 'map inside'. Big mistake."

I hate the stupid trademark games corporations play, but in this case I say "live by the sword, die by the sword." What rational person would try to trademark "map inside"?! It's an envelope... there's a map inside it... how else are you supposed to say it? "Contains cartographic document!" "Navigational aid within!"

In other stupid trademark news, I found out Sunday that U-Haul® has trademarked In-TownTM. That's right, if your move takes you from one house inside the city limits to another, it's an "In-TownTM" move, and thus if you use anyone but U-Haul® you have to pay a royalty. ;-)

Still, nothing will ever hold a candle to Lucasfilm®'s trademarking of NaziTM.

29 posted on 07/30/2002 8:59:11 PM PDT by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson