There, I feel better now.
How about Porsche's use of the "9xx" series... 911, 928, 944, 968, etc.?
Is that not a trademark?
The issue of trademarks is one which is fought daly by all corporations as if you fail to protect it, you loose it. Based on a court decision, this is WHY Intel couldn't trademark 80486 or i486.
BTW, the word "Athlon" is trademarked by a bathroom partion manufacture to which I'm sure AMD is working hard to resolve.
I hate the stupid trademark games corporations play, but in this case I say "live by the sword, die by the sword." What rational person would try to trademark "map inside"?! It's an envelope... there's a map inside it... how else are you supposed to say it? "Contains cartographic document!" "Navigational aid within!"
In other stupid trademark news, I found out Sunday that U-Haul® has trademarked In-TownTM. That's right, if your move takes you from one house inside the city limits to another, it's an "In-TownTM" move, and thus if you use anyone but U-Haul® you have to pay a royalty. ;-)
Still, nothing will ever hold a candle to Lucasfilm®'s trademarking of NaziTM.