Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

While Stratfor must be taken with a grain or two of salt, I must ask the John Birchers - what say you now?
1 posted on 09/12/2002 1:06:55 PM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: sanchmo
Bush Issues Veiled Ultimatum to United Nations....


Anything but veiled
2 posted on 09/12/2002 1:09:11 PM PDT by john316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
Either enforce the resolutions that you passed and that Iraq has mocked for over a decade or the United States essentially will abandon the institution.,

To the UN: Please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please don't enforce the resolutions.

4 posted on 09/12/2002 1:11:09 PM PDT by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
Darn...
Duplicate thread by Axion at .

I'll let the free market of ideas decide which should be pulled.

5 posted on 09/12/2002 1:14:06 PM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
Washington instead needed leverage. It needed an "or else." It could not be, "Or else we'll go it alone," because the United States could not go it alone, at least not effectively. Washington needed an "or else" that generated active cooperation. It appears from Bush's speech to the United Nations that Washington found the lever it needs.

Or else, we boot the U.N. out of the U.S.?

9 posted on 09/12/2002 1:22:27 PM PDT by Nephi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
I always enjoy and appreciate Stratfor's analysis. While it is sometimes bad news, and sometimes wrong, they always support their arguements.

I also believe they are rightfully always cynical, so as for one to not get such a rosey colored picture of what is going on in the world.

That being said, I see this analysis as staing Bush was quite clever in how he put the UN in the corner and is demanding they perform.

I cannot believe Bush would think that anything the UN does will meet his satisfaction. Which is a pattern we saw before with the Taliban...remember how they went from "Give up Osmama, No Way!" to "Talk to our 'Moderate Taliban'(sic) Cleric" to "All we need is more time to examine the evidence" and yet Bush never relaxed the throttle..

The Arab Nations and the UN at large have to respect that Bush means to do what he says he will do. I suspect they are all real nervous.

11 posted on 09/12/2002 1:26:37 PM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
While Stratfor must be taken with a grain or two of salt, I must ask the John Birchers - what say you now?

While not a Bircher, my expectations were very low for this speech. Due in part, to the recent news about rejoining UNESCO after Reagan ended our membership in '86. Perhaps, UNESCO is the carrot and his speech was the whip?

Gee, what would happen to Bush if he pulled out a can of whip-ass on the U.N.? I would put his picture up on my wall next to Reagan's, which is below the Saviour's.

16 posted on 09/12/2002 1:32:02 PM PDT by Nephi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
"... and the question now is not merely about the future of Iraq, but the future of the United Nations."

That is very true and very appropriate. I picked up on that on my first read of the speech.

18 posted on 09/12/2002 1:41:16 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
Rather than proving the moral or technical need for an attack, Bush checkmated his critics by instead challenging the validity of the very institution they support in hopes of thwarting both despots like Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and perceived unilateralists like Bush.

Daschle and Gephardts' checkmates are next.

The only thing I wish Bush would have said, but didn't:

"These conditions are not up for discussion or negotiation"

21 posted on 09/12/2002 1:54:10 PM PDT by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
My interpretation of the President's UN speech today is that unless the UN wants to continue on the road to irrelevancy, they better get aboard the Baghdad Express because the American people are sick and tired of Kofi clatches with Saddam and the unilateral train is leaving the station fixin' to put some whoopass on the Iraqi regime.
22 posted on 09/12/2002 1:58:42 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo

25 posted on 09/12/2002 2:01:29 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
While I often find myself wincing at some of Dubya's speeches (mainly due to the numerous malapropisms), I saw this one on live TV and found myself immensely proud of the way he presented himself and his no-nonsense message in front of the entire world. Whether or not one might agree with him, one couldn't deny the power of the man or his words.

Rather than get sidetracked by the various arguments against removing Saddam, Bush simply told the world: "This is what is going on, and here's what needs to be done about it." Using no more than the force of his character and persuasion of his honesty, he told them to put up or shut up. Nicely done!

President Bush confronted the UN with something it couldn't comprehend: true leadership. I look forward to seeing more of it in the future.

Imal

27 posted on 09/12/2002 2:06:54 PM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
It did not sound "veiled" at all to me.
32 posted on 09/12/2002 2:34:46 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
Bush Issues Veiled Ultimatum to United Nations

Veiled??? Good GOD how could he have been any LESS veiled?

33 posted on 09/12/2002 2:39:23 PM PDT by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
"Either you are with U.S. or you are with the Terrorist"!!

He made it pretty simple....

38 posted on 09/12/2002 2:48:16 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
Gee, they must have read my post from the other night.
42 posted on 09/12/2002 2:49:18 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
If people would listen closely, President Bush did not advocate a unilateral strike. He called upon the UN to enforce its own directives, and made clear the effects of failure to carry out the injunctions which have already been called for on Saddam Hussein. Saddam may be counted upon, that he will do something so flatly arrogant, so egregious, that we shall have no other alternative but to remove him from any position of power. He really does have a choice, right now. Resign and go into exile, and we won't pursue. Allow a peaceful regime change, or there may be one H*ll of an election campaign in Baghdad.
50 posted on 09/12/2002 4:13:58 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
U.S. rejoins UNESCO 18 years after withdrawal
51 posted on 09/12/2002 5:35:06 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
There was no ultimatum. What we heard today was just a stall, to keep the ball in play for another few months (or a couple of years once we start going with the tit-for-tat over utterly pointless weapons inspections) while we scramble to build up our defenses against Saddam's grab-bag of goodies. Nothing wrong with that, by the way -- it seems like a reasonable strategy for dealing with a very prickly situation. But let's not have any illusions about what happened today. Bush blinked.
52 posted on 09/12/2002 5:39:09 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
I've bashed Stratfor some really stupid things they have said, especially about military options.

But I'll have to give them credit here. This is exactly what I thought after I read the speech.

Bush put them in a nearly impossible position. And it doesn't matter which way the UN decides, because we're going anyway.

57 posted on 09/12/2002 6:35:19 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sanchmo
I've seen heavier veils on loose Islamic women.
63 posted on 09/12/2002 7:55:36 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson