Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair Dossier to Link Saddam to Usama Bin Laden
FoxNews | 9/14/02 | FoxNews

Posted on 09/14/2002 2:55:53 PM PDT by RobFromGa

Just heard on FoxNews Channel that Blair says that his dossier will link Saddam Hussein to Usama Bin Laden terror planning and training. CHECKMATE.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: blair; bushdoctrineunfold; iraq; liberalfascist; uk; usamabinladen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last
To: RobFromGa
I do wonder why President George W. Bush didn't ever mention a specific link between Saddam and UBL. Maybe he was waiting for the right time to play the card?

We have to build more cruise missiles and JMATs. It's a simple as that.

No use starting a war and running out of bullets half way through.

41 posted on 09/14/2002 3:51:02 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
The Sunday Telegraph
42 posted on 09/14/2002 3:51:23 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
The difference here is that the pubbies don't look as dumb now that the Clinton's aren't using the NSA to bug the leadership.

I don't think W would stoop to that level, but we all know that the capability is there.
43 posted on 09/14/2002 3:52:14 PM PDT by GEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gumption
This means that Pres. Bush needs no additional congressional approval.

He didn't need it anyway. SJ Res 23 is quite clear. Bush, and Bush alone, gets to decide who's responsible, and order appropriate military action against them.

44 posted on 09/14/2002 3:52:46 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
This explains why Blair has been so rock-solid, unhesitatingly firm in his support. He has seemed even more eager that W to get it on. Now we know why.
45 posted on 09/14/2002 3:54:40 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
No use starting a war and running out of bullets half way through.

Exactly. I believe that's called "counting the cost."

46 posted on 09/14/2002 3:56:17 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ferris
Actually, I don't think that we need a direct Saddam -UBL link to take out Saddam.

The fact that he wants to kill all of us and is working diligently to procure the means to do so is enough for me.

Some people just need to be incarcerated or dead.

Saddam-"Camel-Lover" Hussein is one of these.

47 posted on 09/14/2002 3:56:54 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I understand, but at least he could have hinted at the link.
48 posted on 09/14/2002 4:00:34 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; ...
Bush and staff are playing their hand extremely well!

Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



49 posted on 09/14/2002 4:01:55 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heleny; seamole; Lion's Cub; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; Fish out of Water; backhoe
ping
50 posted on 09/14/2002 4:03:41 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
There's something about Dubya that you need to understand. it goes back even before he was Governor of Texas, but that's when I first found out about it.

He doesn't like leaks. He doesn't like hints. In fact, he mostly hates them.

He's really honest and he never lies. However, he doesn't tell you what he knows until it suits his purpose.

It can drive some of us nuts, but it's not a recent development. He's always been that way.

And if he tells you something in confidence, and you spread it, you're toast as far as he's concerned. You had better be as tight-lipped as he is if you want to stay in the loop.

51 posted on 09/14/2002 4:05:25 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
And I LOVE his honesty. But he needs to have a reason for withholding this info or the Dems will try to roast him for it. That was my point. (Not that they'll succeed)
52 posted on 09/14/2002 4:11:18 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
My kind of guy!

That is just the way the guys on the Prairie told us youngun's to play it as we were growing up!

53 posted on 09/14/2002 4:12:24 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
thanks for the x-link. this is a major development when proved.
54 posted on 09/14/2002 4:13:00 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
The President is a genius for having Blair announce this.

I really think this has more to do with giving up knowledge about Intelligence sources. Britain has some that are fairly well known, so they don't risk losing them - or the people - like we do.
Blair and Bush are giving up information in the safest ways, I think. Neither of them cares about a p*****g contest to see which one knows more. They know what they want to do, and intend to do it in the most effective way.

And, aren't we lucky to have men like this in office at the time when we need them most?

55 posted on 09/14/2002 4:13:41 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
I doubt that ever even enters his thinking. He expects the Democrats to always be trying to roast him for something.

I'm not even sure the ties to Saddam have been known for very long. But if Britain is about to reveal them, then Bush and Blair decided on this game plan last Saturday. The timing and manner was carefully planned for maximum effect.

56 posted on 09/14/2002 4:15:05 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
But he needs to have a reason for withholding this info or the Dems will try to roast him for it.

Yes they would like to know what his next move is.
It would them plan their strategy!

57 posted on 09/14/2002 4:15:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
But he needs to have a reason for withholding this info or the Dems will try to roast him for it.

Methinks he knows the identity of the infamous Congressional leaker.

Checkmate :-)

58 posted on 09/14/2002 4:16:46 PM PDT by Humidston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I love the way the disclosures are being orchestrated!

The Beltway Boys had a reporter on that seems to be tied in closely to the happenings and planning of the Bush Administration. Talked a good deal about the Bush Sept 11 performance. Interesting!

Bush and crew are kicking some serious Democratic butt now!

59 posted on 09/14/2002 4:20:10 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Geez

It would them plan their strategy!

should be -- It would help them plan their strategy!

60 posted on 09/14/2002 4:21:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson