Skip to comments.
HP Announces First Linux Cluster TPC-C Benchmark with Oracle and Red Hat
Enterprise Linux Today ^
| Sep 16, 2002
Posted on 09/17/2002 6:55:32 AM PDT by Knitebane
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
$17.21/tpmC which puts them right at number 5 with thier very first Linux entry.
I find it notable that it beats out the Windows 2K offering running on identical hardware.
The last bastions of Microsoft benchmarks are falling in front of the Linux competition.
1
posted on
09/17/2002 6:55:32 AM PDT
by
Knitebane
To: John Robinson; B Knotts; stainlessbanner; TechJunkYard; ShadowAce; Knitebane; AppyPappy; jae471; ...
The Penguin Ping.
Wanna be Penguified? Just holla!
Got root?
2
posted on
09/17/2002 7:17:10 AM PDT
by
rdb3
To: rdb3
What personal computer company is selling a OEM linux based desktop with a suite of applications compatible to the linux OS?
3
posted on
09/17/2002 7:24:36 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
To: rdb3
Red Hat Linux Advanced Server is ready for robust, high-performance, highly available, enterprise-level applications,"Could you throw some more management buzzwords in there?
Thanks for the ping - good news for open source!
To: KC Burke
I'm not quite sure what you mean.
5
posted on
09/17/2002 7:55:58 AM PDT
by
rdb3
yummmmm.....
To: KC Burke
7
posted on
09/17/2002 8:14:04 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3
You had posted:
Wanna be penquinfied? Jus holler... While I know I can buy a stripped machine and add item by item the Linux system and some linux based software, I am unaware of any OEM that is selling it whole, pre-loaded. Are you aware of such a pairing?
8
posted on
09/17/2002 8:15:19 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
To: KC Burke
How about Dell.
To: KC Burke
Check out post #7. It's got tons
To: KC Burke
I know that there is a hardware company contracted with Lindows that does this. I'm not aware of any others.
11
posted on
09/17/2002 8:29:39 AM PDT
by
rdb3
To: ShadowAce
thanks for the link, and you are right, there are now plenty of hardware systems pre-bundled.
12
posted on
09/17/2002 8:35:33 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
To: Knitebane
Cool. We'e got a cluster here at work. I think we are above 200 nodes now.
13
posted on
09/17/2002 8:44:27 AM PDT
by
jbstrick
To: KC Burke
Is this a trick question? < /grin>
To: Knitebane
I find it notable that it beats out the Windows 2K offering running on identical hardware. The last bastions of Microsoft benchmarks are falling in front of the Linux competition
LMFAO! Look at the top 3, troll: Win2K and SQL 2000.
15
posted on
09/17/2002 2:02:53 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Knitebane
Before you get too euphoric, look at the top 4 and weep:
Rank |
Company |
System |
tpmC |
Price/tpmC |
System Availability |
Database |
Operating System |
TP Monitor |
Date Submitted |
1 |
|
ProLiant DL760-900-128P |
410,769 |
13.02 US $ |
10/15/01 |
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition |
Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server |
Microsoft COM+ |
09/19/01 |
2 |
|
ProLiant DL760-900-192P |
567,882 |
14.04 US $ |
10/15/01 |
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition |
Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server |
Microsoft COM+ |
09/19/01 |
3 |
|
ProLiant DL760-900-256P |
709,220 |
14.96 US $ |
10/15/01 |
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition |
Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server |
Microsoft COM+ |
09/19/01 |
4 |
|
IBM eServer xSeries 370 |
136,766 |
16.93 US $ |
09/20/01 |
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 |
Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server |
Microsoft COM+ |
04/24/01 |
5 |
|
HP ProLiant DL580-PDC 32P C/S |
138,362 |
17.21 US $ |
03/05/03 |
Oracle 9i R2 Enterprise Edition |
Red Hat Linux Advanced Server |
BEA Tuxedo 8.0 |
09/16/02 |
6 |
|
HP ProLiant DL580-0200032P c/s |
137,260 |
18.46 US $ |
06/04/02 |
Oracle 9i R2 Enterprise Edition |
Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server |
BEA Tuxedo 6.5 CTS |
06/04/02 |
7 |
|
IBM e(logo) xSeries 370 c/s |
440,879 |
19.35 US $ |
12/07/00 |
IBM DB2 UDB 7.1 |
Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server |
Microsoft COM+ |
04/11/01 |
8 |
|
IBM e(logo) xSeries 370 c/s |
363,129 |
21.80 US $ |
05/31/01 |
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 |
Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server |
Microsoft COM+ |
04/10/01 |
9 |
|
IBM e(logo) xSeries 370 c/s |
688,220 |
22.58 US $ |
05/31/01 |
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 |
Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server |
Microsoft COM+ |
04/10/01 |
16
posted on
09/17/2002 6:13:31 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Knitebane
And another thing... look at the availability date: Next year!!!
17
posted on
09/17/2002 6:14:33 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: KC Burke
You miss the point. Linux is NOT aimed at the general PC market.........either for the home user or even for the average "business" user. When it comes to Intel platforms (desktop, deskside), it IS aimed squarely at the TECHNICAL desktop (think "UNIX replacement") and is kicking major ass.
To: james_hayes
Nope. Not Dell. Servers and workstations only.
To: Bush2000
Wow! MS pulls a better score on faster hardware! Wow!
But running on identical hardware, Linux runs faster, as shown by the chart.
Gee, I wonder what will happen when they put Linux on the same hardware as the number one scoring system?
Nice spin attempt, but once again, your FUD doesn't stand up to the light of day.
Back into your crack, cockroach, the lightswitch is on.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson