Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite equality, women today still prefer gentlemen
The UK Telegraph ^ | 9-20-02 | By Sarah Womack Social Affairs Correspondent

Posted on 09/19/2002 5:26:17 PM PDT by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Thornwell Simons
A good cinematic example of a gentleman deliberately insulting someone is in A Man for All Seasons when Sir Thomas More (Paul Scofield) insults his friend (Norfolk?) because he's trying to end their friendship. One line is to the effect that the English nobility would have slept through the Sermon on the Mount.
41 posted on 09/19/2002 7:08:38 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Conservobabe
You, sir, are not a true gentleman. How do you know that the woman you open the door for in a grocery store, a stranger to you, has met your criteria? I am laughing out loud, really.

LOL! Thanks for the question Conservobabe. The answer is easy. I always hold the door. The woman's reaction tells me if she's a lady (they always smile & thank you).

Prompting gentlemanly behavior is almost the same as getting a puppy to wag its tail...you just pet them!

42 posted on 09/19/2002 7:12:05 PM PDT by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Conservobabe
President Clinton, on the other hand, is a true cad. And a stupid cad at that, as he has never thought the need to be a gentleman.

At Clinton's first inargural ball, he threw old Hillary around like a sack of potatoes on the dance floor, while waving over his shoulder at others in the room. And we never saw his daughter during the campaign until polls showed that most people had never even guessed that they had a child. And I do remember Clinton saying when Newt's mother called Hillary a bitch to Connie Chung, he said "why my mother would say the same thing". His mother was already deceased, if I recall.

A true gentleman respects the women in his life and Bill Clinton did not.

43 posted on 09/19/2002 7:12:56 PM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RLK
I understand what you're saying. Rewarding bad behavior usually encourages it.

I try not to let my actions be manipulated in that fashion. A true gentleman is such in spite of those who do not value manners or honor. (Sometimes it's hard, and I confess I don't always meet my own standards. It can be a daily struggle.)

It is not for me to judge another's worthiness. It's also a bad idea to let yourself be defined by others.

44 posted on 09/19/2002 7:14:54 PM PDT by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
LOL! Thanks for the question Conservobabe. The answer is easy. I always hold the door. The woman's reaction tells me if she's a lady (they always smile & thank you).

As well you should, if you are a gentleman. Tis nice if a lady says thank you with a smile. (I always do). But, a true gentleman does not care if the woman does not. He knows in his heart that he is who he is, confident in his definition of gallantry.

45 posted on 09/19/2002 7:24:22 PM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Conservobabe
"A true gentleman respects the women in his life and Bill Clinton did not."

So why were 2 out of 3 votes for Clinton in 1996 cast by women?

46 posted on 09/19/2002 7:32:40 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
This illustrates the point I started out with. Large segments of the female population have no appreciation for real men. But that doesn't make them right. Conservobabe's statement is still correct.
47 posted on 09/19/2002 7:36:47 PM PDT by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Funny most women tend to go for a**holes.
48 posted on 09/19/2002 7:40:00 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
True its so sad what the feminazis did. Under the Weikelian Empire feminist would share the gallows with communist and islamic clerics.
49 posted on 09/19/2002 7:42:26 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: alpowolf
A true gentleman is such in spite of those who do not value manners or honor. (Sometimes it's hard, and I confess I don't always meet my own standards. It can be a daily struggle.) It is not for me to judge another's worthiness. It's also a bad idea to let yourself be defined by others.

Wow! Will you marry me?

50 posted on 09/19/2002 7:48:30 PM PDT by grasshopper2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: grasshopper2
I want to say yes but must remind myself,Festina lente. I would be delighted to make your acquaitance.
51 posted on 09/19/2002 7:58:58 PM PDT by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Conservobabe
What a terribly sad and cynical thread.

But he is absolutely correct. If you comment on a woman colleague's appearance, you can get fired, and taken to court for sexual harassment. That is the truth. That is the law. I have quit giving women colleagues any compliments at all on their appearance. Many years ago, I did it a lot in order to encourage them, and let them feel good. Now it is too dangerous. It is foolish to take a chance. Ladies, you can thank your feminist leaders for accomplishing this.

52 posted on 09/19/2002 8:00:42 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Since it takes 2 to tango...

Women want gentlemen...but gentlemen must settle for "women"...not LADIES?

This is a crooked deck.
53 posted on 09/19/2002 8:05:40 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Working out the difference between chivalry and sexism may be a minefield for men, but most women would prefer them to be more gallant, a survey has found

Minefield for men ?? If a woman can't appreciate chivalry, honor and courtesy, that's HER problem and I would not want to have a realtionship with her in any event.

54 posted on 09/19/2002 8:10:48 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
,,, you're right Muttly. I was brought up with good manners and they had a value attached to them. Now, our culture seems to define a gentleman as one who takes the weight on his elbows.

It's easy to pick someone, male or female, who can identify with manners and they're worthy of such courtesy. Womyn are easy to profile and if my path crosses with their path, they're treated as equals - very easy.

55 posted on 09/19/2002 8:21:38 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
My Dad was once empowered to oversee the refurbishment of a high fashion salon on 7th. Ave., NYC some years ago. He sent a man to the hardware store to get a new sign for the rest room. The man came back with a "Ladies" sign.

The famous Lt.Col. eyebrow went up...he handed the sign back, and added to his Garment Industry reputation with the words: "Ladies do not leave a rest room in this condition. Take it back, and get one that says "Women."
56 posted on 09/19/2002 8:29:11 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
So why were 2 out of 3 votes for Clinton in 1996 cast by women?

Women who voted for Clinton are not ladies.

57 posted on 09/19/2002 8:31:30 PM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
,,, insight, indeed.
58 posted on 09/19/2002 8:35:46 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Conservobabe
BTTT
59 posted on 09/19/2002 8:36:35 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
I think we are confusing the true gentleman with one who merely has manners. Not so, as it runs much deeper.
60 posted on 09/19/2002 8:38:06 PM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson