Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: GORE TO SPEAK SHORTLY ON IRAQ - 3:15 approx
MSNBC | 9/23/02 | Wait4Truth

Posted on 09/23/2002 12:06:30 PM PDT by Wait4Truth

Thought you guys would not want to miss the algore trying to upstage President Bush in whatever way he can. Join in and have your say! LOL!


TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: algoreisnotmyprez; anothergorefart; gore; iraq; pullmyfinger; speech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-388 next last
To: Dog
Hannity's decided to dip in and dip out of the dips speech....
141 posted on 09/23/2002 12:42:32 PM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
Just compare this to President Bush's straight talk! Unreal!
142 posted on 09/23/2002 12:42:38 PM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
Am I hearing a little more "Southern Drawl" every once in awhile--is that a new "style" ???

I noticed that the other day, when he was down in Florida chatting up Reno. The guy has decided to reinvent himself agin, although I'm not sure exactly as what. I think he's basically self-destructing before our eyes. It's amazing to behold.

143 posted on 09/23/2002 12:42:43 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Frapster
stupid phone call interrupted me... resuming.

In 1991 there was a resolution that had been passed by the UN. It was easier to build a coalition and get a resolution in 1991 because Iraq had invaded Kuwait.

This year, by contrast, many of our allies are openly opposed. And those who do support us have conditioned their support on the new UN resolution.

The 1991 coalition picked up the significant cost of the war. This time we will have to shoulder the burden of cost on our own. Does he have an original thought here?

He is now asserting that GWB is politically motivated because GWB is trying to make this happen before the elections.

144 posted on 09/23/2002 12:42:47 PM PDT by Frapster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
"Saddam has not invaded anyone so we have no right to attack him, he says. He sounds totally stupid in today's world!"

Presumably he forgot those hundreds of bombings on Iraq ordered between 1992 - 2000?

145 posted on 09/23/2002 12:42:57 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
This guy is so tone deaf......9/11 changed everything..

His he drunk???

146 posted on 09/23/2002 12:43:09 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: All
"in 1991 G HW Bush waited till after the elction for a vote on use of force"Gore implying there are politics involved.
147 posted on 09/23/2002 12:43:26 PM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Have you had word from the Kurds that they plan to protect Al-Qaeda after Saddam falls? Let me know if you have.
148 posted on 09/23/2002 12:43:34 PM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"I felt betrayed by Bush's hasty retreat form Iraq in 1991"

I feel betrayed by Clinton-Gore incompetence and weak-kneed inaction in the face of the multiple provocations from al-Qaeda during their 8 years in power.

Why do democrats insist on being given the green light from the UN to defend the national interests of the United States? Why do they feel good only when committing American arms in support of other nation's and organization's interests? Why is Gore willing to wait for another terrorist attack (this time using biological or nuclear weapons) at worst, or for Iraq to be in position to blackmail, with WMD, the United States out of defending it's allies or interests in the region?

To complete the pose, all Al needs is an umbrella. Instant Chamberlain.

149 posted on 09/23/2002 12:43:48 PM PDT by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: noexcuses
okay--I am totally lost now...he really is bad...does he have a point ? Is anybody getting it...other than "we need a multi-lateral consensus"

Oh German-American relationship ...reprehensible comment...is he defending Bush ? (in a backhanded way)

150 posted on 09/23/2002 12:43:54 PM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Frapster
MSNBC cutting away..
151 posted on 09/23/2002 12:44:19 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
Naw, I only wish. But I do wonder if this is Gore on his own, or McCauliflower encouraging Gore to political suicide himself.

(I know, suicide isn't a verb, but it just flowed well.)
152 posted on 09/23/2002 12:44:20 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
You know, no one broadcasts my statement on Iraq and I'm a private citizen too.
153 posted on 09/23/2002 12:44:31 PM PDT by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

AlBore is so bad even MSNBC is taking a commercial break.
154 posted on 09/23/2002 12:44:55 PM PDT by Skel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Bill Press said that it was a powerful speech... Give me a break.

They broke for commercials if I were Al, I'd be embarrased.

155 posted on 09/23/2002 12:44:56 PM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
MSNBC left him. Bill Press calls it a "powerful speech" in opposition to President Bush! LOL!
156 posted on 09/23/2002 12:45:07 PM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Is Scott Ritter gonna be his running mate?
157 posted on 09/23/2002 12:45:16 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Frapster
gah! these phones.

They keep saying this a 'strong' speech - taking a quick break from the speech.

There's nothing new in this speech. It sounds to me that they've listened to every news broadcast since Iraq started heating up and are regurgitating everything that sounds plausible. Talk about a poll approach to government.

158 posted on 09/23/2002 12:45:17 PM PDT by Frapster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
And in 1998, Bill Clinton whipped up a Congressional resolution demanding force to remove Saddam from power to protect his sorry butt from impeachment. But there was no politics involved in that. That was a righteous cause... spare me!
159 posted on 09/23/2002 12:45:21 PM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Dog
His he drunk???

His you drunk???

;-)

160 posted on 09/23/2002 12:45:58 PM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-388 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson