Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nature Conservancy to demonstrate sustainable timber harvest methods [Virginia]
The Coalfield Progress ^ | Oct. 8, 2002 | Staff Writer

Posted on 10/08/2002 7:35:27 AM PDT by madfly

The Nature Conservancy has announced plans to demonstrate sustainable forestry practices while protecting and restoring freshwater mussel sites along the Clinch River.
The conservancy plans to establish "demonstration forests" on two tracts - 164 acres in Russell County near St. Paul and 550 acres at Cedar Bluff - the group recently acquired from Holbrook Land Management and Clinch Valley Farms Trust.


Both properties will be managed as part of The Nature Conservancy's Conservation Forestry program, according to an Oct. 2 news release from the organization.


Under the program's guidelines, the conservancy will carefully harvest timber from the sites using methods designed to protect water quality and maintain the natural functions of forest eco-systems, according to the release.


By showcasing sustainable timber harvest methods, The Nature Conservancy hopes to stimulate interest in the conservation forestry program and influence forest managers to adopt similar practices.


After the forest management work is under way, the organization plans to offer field trips and eventually install interpretive signs for self-guided tours, according to the news release.


"The diversity of the forests across the two sites will allow us to demonstrate a wide variety of management techniques," Bill Kittrell, director of the conservancy's Clinch Valley program, is quoted in the release.


The Nature Conservancy, a private, non-profit conservation organization, has one million members. To date, the group and its members have protected more than 12 million acres in the United States, including 235,000 in Virginia. The group owns 35 preserves in Virginia. For more information, visit nature.org on the Internet.

©Coalfield.com 2002


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: demoforests; enviralists; timberharvest; tnc

1 posted on 10/08/2002 7:35:27 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; Libertarianize the GOP; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Stand Watch Listen; freefly; expose; ...
ping
2 posted on 10/08/2002 7:36:13 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Make Sure Free Republic Is Here For The Next Generation Of Freepers!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

3 posted on 10/08/2002 7:38:26 AM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
4 posted on 10/08/2002 7:41:08 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The Nature Conservancy, a private, non-profit conservation organization, has one million members. To date, the group and its members have protected more than 12 million acres in the United States, including 235,000 in Virginia. The group owns 35 preserves in Virginia. For more information, visit nature.org on the Internet.

Soon The United States of America will be gone It will be the United Conservany of the America's

5 posted on 10/08/2002 7:46:45 AM PDT by TonyWojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
BTTT!!!!!
6 posted on 10/08/2002 7:54:12 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Sooo...the Nature Conservancy is getting into the logging business now? Does that mean it's OK if the Greens do it, but it's still verboten for the private sector? That figures. One set of rules for me, and another set for thee.
7 posted on 10/08/2002 8:00:56 AM PDT by holyscroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
Most Greens don't consider the Nature Conservancy to be Green; they consider them to be EINOs (Environmentalists in Name Only).

It's hilarious when people post Nature Conservancy articles on FR and then act like they're some sort of fanatical envirowhacko group.

They're despised by the envirowhackos because they accept that economic activity should exist, because they pay people for land instead of having the government take it from them, etc.
8 posted on 10/08/2002 8:03:51 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TonyWojo
The Nature Conservancy is an older group practicing almost a Teddy Roosevelt brand of environmentalism. As I understand it, their primary method of conservation is to BUY the land they want to conserve.

Sounds like a very private market, conservative approach to me. If only other groups, the usual enviro wackos, would follow suit...
9 posted on 10/08/2002 8:07:56 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John H K; TonyWojo
Oh they're fanatical all righty as far as their goals are concerned, but their methods are different because they are not opposed to making money SO THAT THEY CAN GET MORE LAND. TNC drills for oil too.

I would have no objection to TNC if they weren't conspiring with government to fraudulently use environmental regulation to destroy landowners financially making their land cheaper to buy. I would have no problem if they paid taxes like the landowners do. I would have no problem if the government weren't buying their aquisisitons at a fat profit, effectively using them as a land aquisition real estate agent. I would have no problem with the TNC if they weren't destroying the economic value of habitat management enterprise.

You still haven't learned. This is all about money; both for TNC and the sponsors of the RICOnuts, because they are one and the same. What the idiots on the ground representing either of these gropus think doesn't matter at all.
10 posted on 10/08/2002 8:25:09 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John H K; AnalogReigns; TonyWojo; Carry_Okie
American Policy.org

NOW HEAR THIS

Land Grabbing Secrets of the Conservancy

Never heard of The Nature Conservancy? Well, that's probably no accident. It keeps a low profile by design. When you run scams like it does, you don't want to be notorious.

So let's lift the rock off these slugs and shine a very bright spotlight on a few of their most outrageous games.

The Nature Conservancy is the richest, most powerful environmental colossus in the world. It claims 680,000 individual members and 405 corporate members operating out of eight regional offices and fifty chapter offices across the nation. The Nature Conservancy has assets of almost $1 Billion and has an annual operating budget of over $300 million and a staff of 1150 people.

THE SCAM - real estate. THE HOOK - "conservation through private action." According to the party line, The Nature Conservancy simply buys land with private money and sets up nature reserves, thereby helping the environment without infringing on anybody. What a wonderful, charitable idea. Ah, if only it were true.

THE VICTIMS - unsuspecting property owners (many times elderly). THE METHODS - hide behind phony corporations; serve as a shill for government agencies; work behind the scenes with more visible environmental groups to intimidate property owners into selling. THE GOAL - money and power.

The Nature Conservancy frequently uses phony front companies to get land from owners who wouldn't knowingly sell to an environmentalist group.

It used this tactic to purchase most of the islands off the coast of Virginia, containing 40,000 acres and sixty miles of coastline. In doing so The Nature Conservancy was able to stop all private development and control the use of the land, damaging the tax base, killing thousands of jobs, and severely curbing the locals from hunting, fishing, camping and joy riding on the islands.

But don't think the purpose was to preserve these beautiful, pristine islands for nature. The Nature Conservancy did bar others from developing the land - but not itself. Far from it. At a huge profit, the Conservancy developed up-scale homes for the rich.

But how is that bad? If they do it with private money what's wrong with it? Isn't that just free enterprise?

The problem is The Nature Conservancy is a non-profit organization with tax exempt status and they maintain that status because of their tightly protected image as benevolent conservationists. Moreover, property owners on the islands wanted to invest in development and thought they were selling their land to developers. They were aware of and frightened by the Nature Conservancy and would never have sold to the group. That's why the Conservancy hid behind a phony land company, grabbed power, foiled the development and made a huge profit on tax-exempt money. Today much of the coast of Virginia is off-limits to tourists and other development.

Other times, The Nature Conservancy acts as a shill to a government agency to acquire land cheaply and sell it to the government at a huge profit. Again, conservation is not the goal.

One of its favorite scams goes something like this. Your grandmother owns land close to a historic site or a wilderness area. The government wants the land to expand a park but grandmother won't sell.

One day a representative of the Nature Conservancy shows up, well dressed, smiling, but concerned. He tells your grandmother that he's just learned that the government intends to take her land after she passes away. She won't be able to sell it or give it to her children. However, he can offer a solution.

If Grandmother will sell her land to The Nature Conservancy he can assure her that the land will stay in private hands and not be taken by the government.

Well, a relieved grandmother is much happier and she agrees to sell. However, says the nice man from The Nature Conservancy, because the government has threatened to take the land, its value is now only about half its reported market value. That's all he'll be able to pay her. Well, thinks grandmother, half is better than nothing, so she sells.

The next day our friend from The Nature Conservancy makes a call to the Department of the Interior informing them that their plan has worked. The whole thing had been pre-arranged between them before anyone ever knocked on Grandmother's door. As arranged, The Nature Conservancy then sells the land to the Interior Department FOR FULL MARKET VALUE PLUS OVERHEAD, FINANCING AND HANDLING CHARGES.

Hundreds of complaints have been recorded concerning the practices of the Conservancy's land grabbing operation. One family in Indiana had to sue to get back their father's land that was signed over to The Nature Conservancy when he was very old and mentally incompetent to handle his affairs. Agents of the Conservancy had helped him in changing documents that left his entire estate to The Nature Conservancy. The family won back their property but only after being forced to spend a fortune in legal fees.

Unfortunately space allows only a minor look at the mammoth operation of The Nature Conservancy. Its power, wealth and control is almost beyond comprehension. Yet it is able to maintain an image of idealism and concern for the environment.

The truth is The Nature Conservancy is really little more than a massive, ruthless real estate machine using its tax exempt status and ties to the government to create wealth for itself.

So If ever you receive a knock on the door from a smiling representative of The Nature Conservancy, slam it in his face and rush to you neighbors to sound the alarm, or the saying "there goes the neighborhood" could take on a completely different meaning. 

© 2002 American Policy Center


11 posted on 10/08/2002 8:26:21 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John H K
It's hilarious when people post Nature Conservancy articles on FR and then act like they're some sort of fanatical envirowhacko group.

They're despised by the envirowhackos because they accept that economic activity should exist, because they pay people for land instead of having the government take it from them, etc.

In deed. But you will not have much luck convincing many people on FR that this is true. Many people think any NGO out there trying to acquire and protect land just "coerces" and "threatens" property owners to go along with their wishes.

12 posted on 10/08/2002 8:26:23 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
Robert Redford does their radio spots.
13 posted on 10/08/2002 8:31:32 AM PDT by uglybiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
Instead of initiating force or threat of force, TNC initiates fraud. More important, government owned land is supposed to be limited to the operation of necessary government. Judicial, legislative and executive buildings and military bases.
14 posted on 10/08/2002 9:35:15 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Zon
Instead of initiating force or threat of force, TNC initiates fraud.

Fraud in what way?

More important, government owned land is supposed to be limited to the operation of necessary government. Judicial, legislative and executive buildings and military bases.

Oh, I agree. I would prefer that the government buy as little land as possible. I think if the government wants to conserve land, then do it only through willing conservation easements so that the fee simple ownership stays in private hands.

15 posted on 10/08/2002 9:38:05 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally

Fraud in what way?

Read post #11. Also, TNC is but one example of political-agenda driven business as compared to market-driven business.

16 posted on 10/08/2002 9:45:21 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks for the heads up!
17 posted on 10/08/2002 9:58:40 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John H K
That is a most interesting observation from you, however I beg to disagree! There are many instances when TNC has been responsible for "being the vultures on the fence" , meaning that they have been very responsible for getting land values down, and buying them for nothing and selling to the government at very high prices! Ask the folks in Maine! Look up victims of regulatory abuse!
18 posted on 10/09/2002 12:22:08 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: madfly; sauropod; Carry_Okie
Madfly, thank you very much for that posting!
19 posted on 10/09/2002 12:25:23 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson