Posted on 10/14/2002 3:46:57 PM PDT by AAABEST
Gov. Jeb Bush continued asking for specific ideas from Democratic gubernatorial nominee Bill McBride on Sunday, especially regarding McBride's newly released plan for Florida's environmental future. Bush, appearing before supporters in Fort Lauderdale, attacked his challenger for refusing to talk about certain tenets of the plan, including its cost.
FORT LAUDERDALE Gov. Jeb Bush continued asking for specific ideas from Democratic gubernatorial nominee Bill McBride on Sunday, especially regarding McBride's newly released plan for Florida's environmental future.
Bush, appearing before supporters in Fort Lauderdale, attacked his challenger for refusing to talk about certain tenets of the plan, including its cost.
|
McBride, who made campaign stops at five predominantly black churches in the Tampa area Sunday morning, said the environmental plan is still in its initial stages and specific details have not been finalized.
"It's just an approach," McBride said. "It will not have a significant fiscal effect."
Speaking later Sunday at a barbecue with 700 supporters in Tampa, Bush said McBride "refuses to offer one specific proposal regarding what he would do as governor."
McBride's list, released on Saturday, said in part that he would protect agricultural and forest lands, maintain the state's land-acquisition programs, ban offshore oil drilling and hasten restoration of the Everglades.
Some environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, have endorsed McBride.
McBride's message was essentially the same at all five churches he visited Sunday. In his remarks, he assured voters that they know where he stands on issues facing the state.
"The most important question is the first question in the Bible; God speaking to Adam, asking 'Where are you?' That's a question you have to ask politicians," McBride said. "Where's are you? Where's your heart? Where do you stand? You know where I stand."
Jeb has spent his time detroying conservative communities and voting blocks (including mine) to win over greens and they turn around and stick it up his a$$.
Too rich. I guess the Bush's never learn, they have to learn the hard way.
Gotta love it.
I can't help but laugh at this while my friends and community suffer greatly for his ill-conceived blunderings.
It's also sad that I take a sick pleasure when one of their ignorant greenie recruits falls from a tree and dies.
Like Golda Mier said about the Palis, I hate them for that.
The RATS are in disarray...eradicate the rodents !!
Fire Democrats, Hire Republicans !!
GWB Is The Man !!
Snuff Saddam, NOW !!
Death To all Tyrant's !!
The Second Amendment...
America's Original Homeland Security !!
Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!
Molon Labe !!
Somebody should tell Carl Rove that Republicans can NEVER pander as much as the Slave Party will. Instead of trying to look green by setting aside more protected areas, Bush should be showing how the history of government "good ideas" to protect the Everglades has led to many of the problems it suffers. Then he should show how market solutions to ag runoff problems reduced the nutrient problems in the area faster than the project goal.
Proving that you can do the job better beats pretending that protection "works" and then racing to show how much you can "protect" while destroying your own political base in the process. It also beats the environmental damage that "environmental protection" all too often brings.
Of course; as we both know, the RICOnuts never were about the environment. Theirs is a corrupt plan to feed a bureaucracy, profit a powerful few, and a demographic and economic war against the Constitution of the United States.
Your county is over 90% owned by the your fed local and state governemnt. Why do I know this and you don't?
I really don't have time to explain the entire 8.1 billion Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan and it's 68 projects but let me give you the bottom line.
Jeb decided to take up Clinton's big plans for a huge land grab. When the whole scheme was devised, he sat down with the huge sugar growers, enviro-real estate conglomerates, real estate developers and the Clinton admin (remember those cute photo ops?) and wrote legislation to "restore" the everglades. The sugar companies and the developers wanted the water, and the government agencies and the NGO enviro-groups wanted the land. They got it.
None of the stakeholders who would most be affected by this were consulted or even given a heads up. Now they're getting screwed.
Have you ever heard of the 8 1/2 square mile area? Guess not. Well they're about to have most of thier community bulldozed as a sacrificial lamb by unelected and unaccountable government agencies who are operating outside congessionally mandated law (NEPA). They've already had they're property devalued drastically because of intentional flooding to cause them to become "willing sellers". HERE is just one homeowner's story. Here is some more info for you.
In my area they're attempting the same thing, they're just getting started with us. You don't know the eviro-creep business plan by now? From one long time FReeper to another let me inform you:
Step 1. Create a "Crisis" based un-peer reviewed junk science.
Step 2. Devalue the surrounding property and as a side benefit destroy a conservative voting block.
Step 3. Commence to buying up all the surrounding land at bargain basement prices.
I have to educate you on this stuff?
If you want to talk intelligently I'm here to help. If you want to act like a newbie go away, I honestly don't have time. I'm not kidding, I don't have time for stupidity.
God bless you.
LOL! I can understand that you might be confused coming in this late to an issue with a long, obscure, and dirty history.
A lot of the demographic war against landowners in the US is for control of the Senate, by which to govern the US via international treaty law through the courts. That is effectively what Global Governance through the UN is all about. The key is to use the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act to gain control of land use. Both those laws use international treaties held at the UN for their authority to take private property from US citizens. Although the citizens do have to be compensated, first you make the land virtually worthless by saddling it with regulatory costs. The UN itself however is but a front for VERY large and VERY corrupt financial interests expressing themselves through tax exempt foundations. They fund RICOnut (environmentalist) non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to bring the lawsuits and control the cases with grant money to universities along with the aquiring agencies. There are numerous interests involved in these aquisitions:
In the case of parts of South Florida, Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona, one issue is about control of food, primarily winter crops. International investors (for example Lloyd Bensten (Clinton's early Treasury Secretary) leads a consortium that has sunk over $2 Billion into producing assets offshore, where there are no safety rules, no environmental restrictions, no Social Security, and labor is dirt cheap. They seek to simply put US producers out of business to enhance the return on that investment and gain coercive power (food) over an unsuspecting urban population.
Lenin did the same thing.
What will they do with the abandoned land here? Well, some of it will be converted to eco-dachas, largely for retirees so development interests are involved. The former landowners will be shoved into cities where they are grossly outnumbered by the dependent classes and the land will be managed by equally dependent bureaucrats. Retirees, bureaucrats, and laborers will outnumber the producers and their suppliers and a permanent demographic conversion will result.
The fat cats make money all around, the peons outnumber independent citizens, and democratic fascism comes to America! It's that simple.
It is kind of comical in a tragic sort of way. It would be nice if people who should know better would at least know what the hell is going on in their own damned backyard.
Lol! It's my job, sorta. One of the reasons I am here at FR is to learn how to compress that information.
You're getting pretty good at it. I'm thinking about writing an essay on the salvage job I have going...I am having trouble selling the wood and finding loggers...it's been 90 days since the fire and we are already getting 30-40% blue stain in the pine, resulting in a 50% drop in value. A real case study in how even salvage logging is rapidly becoming economically unfeasible in our area.
The true essence of the problem.
Thanks for keeping me on your ping list. Keep up the good work.
LOL! I was thinking every member of my ping list would probably want my head by now for clogging up their inbox.
Thank you sir for taking an interest, you're sorely needed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.