XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SAT OCT 19, 2002 11:42:34 ET XXXXX Posted on 10/19/2002 10:01:38 AM PDT by The Raven
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SAT OCT 19, 2002 11:42:34 ET XXXXX
DOWD: BUSH 'BOY EMPEROR'
NY TIMES op-ed queen Maureen Dowd is planning to rip President Bush like she has never ripped before in a dispatch set for Sunday publication, sources close to the columnist tell DRUDGE.
Dowd, courting controversy, declares: "The Boy Emperor picked up the morning paper and, stunned, dropped his Juicy Juice box with the little straw attached. 'Oh, man,' he wailed. 'North Korea's got nukes... 'Get me Condi!' the boy yelled. 'And a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.'"
Dowd refers to Bush as a "boy" no less than ten times in the column she's planning to file.
"'Huh?' the Boy said."
Dowd mocks.
MORE
"Boy Emperor was starting to feel bamboozled."
Dowd stabs.
'"Why are we mad at North Korea for flouting its international agreements when we flout our international agreements?' the Boy wondered."
Dowd pops.
"...the Boy pressed."
Dowd punches.
"The Boy Emperor was more befuddled than ever."
On and on Dowd goes until she hits 711 brutal words, and finally comes up for air.
NY Times Dowd Daschle
That's exactly what this is all about. The news is out that the NYT's two heros, Clinton and Carter, made the biggest foreign policy error (act of treason) in the history of the United States with the full support of the NYT and they're lashing out to deflect attention. They're irresponsible scum liars.
I have seen your column in which you attempt to refer to President Bush as the "Boy Emperor". I don't know the back of which cereal box you plucked this monicker from, but it is instantly recognisable as being symptomatic of your continuing spouting of utter nonsense at the President. The President is not an Emperor, nor does he behave as if his trappings are imperial. Rather, that sort of behaviour can be ascribed to Bill Clinton, whose philosophy of government apparently was "L'etat c'est moi", and bent the offices of that state accordingly.
I don't know if this odd behaviour on your part comes from the fact that Bill Clinton apparently sent Michael Douglas to "distract" you. Once Clinton was out of danger, indeed, Douglas dropped you for Catherina Zeta Jones. No, dropped is too mild a term: he ditched, abandoned, dumped, rejected, discarded, put in the toilet bowl and flushed you. I would suggest that in spite of what logic may occur to you as a liberal (and that is indeed minimal), bashing President Bush will not bring him back, nor will it fill the barren Sahara of your womb.
Indeed, it is getting to the point where your epithets may even turn off New York Times readers, at least those who are not bored to sleep by the Pretentious Grey Bimbo by the time they reach your blatherings. In which case, you may be deprived of your sole form of psychological release, littering published materials and the internet with your brain droppings.
In other words, get a grip Maureen.
Ivan
London, England
Dropping Dowdy for Catherine Zeta-Jones? Talk about trading up!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.