Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gore Vidal claims 'Bush junta' complicit in 9/11
Guardian Observer via Drudge Report ^ | October 27, 2002 | Sunder Katwala

Posted on 10/28/2002 9:18:10 AM PST by Alissa

America's most controversial novelist calls for an investigation into whether the Bush administration deliberately allowed the terrorist attacks to happen

America's most controversial writer Gore Vidal has launched the most scathing attack to date on George W Bush's Presidency, calling for an investigation into the events of 9/11 to discover whether the Bush administration deliberately chose not to act on warnings of Al-Qaeda's plans.

Vidal's highly controversial 7000 word polemic titled 'The Enemy Within' - published in the print edition of The Observer today - argues that what he calls a 'Bush junta' used the terrorist attacks as a pretext to enact a pre-existing agenda to invade Afghanistan and crack down on civil liberties at home.

Vidal writes: 'We still don't know by whom we were struck that infamous Tuesday, or for what true purpose. But it is fairly plain to many civil libertarians that 9/11 put paid not only to much of our fragile Bill of Rights but also to our once-envied system of government which had taken a mortal blow the previous year when the Supreme Court did a little dance in 5/4 time and replaced a popularly elected President with the oil and gas Bush-Cheney junta.'

Vidal argues that the real motive for the Afghanistan war was to control the gateway to Eurasia and Central Asia's energy riches. He quotes extensively from a 1997 analysis of the region by Zgibniew Brzezinski, formerly national security adviser to President Carter, in support of this theory. But, Vidal argues, US administrations, both Democrat and Republican, were aware that the American public would resist any war in Afghanistan without a truly massive and widely perceived external threat.

'Osama was chosen on aesthetic grounds to be the frightening logo for our long-contemplated invasion and conquest of Afghanistan ... [because] the administration is convinced that Americans are so simple-minded that they can deal with no scenario more complex than the venerable, lone, crazed killer (this time with zombie helpers) who does evil just for the fun of it 'cause he hates us because we're rich 'n free 'n he's not.' Vidal also attacks the American media's failure to discuss 11 September and its consequences: 'Apparently, "conspiracy stuff" is now shorthand for unspeakable truth.'

'It is an article of faith that there are no conspiracies in American life. Yet, a year or so ago, who would have thought that most of corporate America had been conspiring with accountants to cook their books since - well, at least the bright dawn of the era of Reagan and deregulation.'

At the heart of the essay are questions about the events of 9/11 itself and the two hours after the planes were hijacked. Vidal writes that 'astonished military experts cannot fathom why the government's "automatic standard order of procedure in the event of a hijacking" was not followed'.

These procedures, says Vidal, determine that fighter planes should automatically be sent aloft as soon as a plane has deviated from its flight plan. Presidential authority is not required until a plane is to be shot down. But, on 11 September, no decision to start launching planes was taken until 9.40am, eighty minutes after air controllers first knew that Flight 11 had been hijacked and fifty minutes after the first plane had struck the North Tower.

'By law, the fighters should have been up at around 8.15. If they had, all the hijacked planes might have been diverted and shot down.'

Vidal asks why Bush, as Commander-in-Chief, stayed in a Florida classroom as news of the attacks broke: 'The behaviour of President Bush on 11 September certainly gives rise to not unnatural suspicions.' He also attacks the 'nonchalance' of General Richard B Myers, acting Joint Chief of Staff, in failing to respond until the planes had crashed into the twin towers.

Asking whether these failures to act expeditiously were down to conspiracy, coincidence or error, Vidal notes that incompetence would usually lead to reprimands for those responsible, writing that 'It is interesting how often in our history, when disaster strikes, incompetence is considered a better alibi than .... Well, yes, there are worse things.'

Vidal draws comparisons with another 'day of infamy' in American history, writing that 'The truth about Pearl Harbour is obscured to this day. But it has been much studied. 11 September, it is plain, is never going to be investigated if Bush has anything to say about it.' He quotes CNN reports that Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle to limit Congressional investigation of the day itself, ostensibly on grounds of not diverting resources from the anti-terror campaign.

Vidal calls bin Laden an 'Islamic zealot' and 'evil doer' but argues that 'war' cannot be waged on the abstraction of 'terrorism'. He says that 'Every nation knows how - if it has the means and will - to protect itself from thugs of the sort that brought us 9/11 ... You put a price on their heads and hunt them down. In recent years, Italy has been doing that with the Sicilian Mafia; and no-one has suggested bombing Palermo.'

Vidal also highlights the role of American and Pakistani intelligence in creating the fundamentalist terrorist threat: 'Apparently, Pakistan did do it - or some of it' but with American support. "From 1979, the largest covert operation in the history of the CIA was launched in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan ... the CIA covertly trained and sponsored these warriors.'

Vidal also quotes the highly respected defence journal Jane's Defence Weekly on how this support for Islamic fundamentalism continued after the emergence of bin Laden: 'In 1988, with US knowledge, bin Laden created Al-Qaeda (The Base); a conglomerate of quasi-independent Islamic terrorist cells spread across 26 or so countries. Washington turned a blind eye to Al-Qaeda.'

Vidal, 77, and internationally renowned for his award-winning novels and plays, has long been a ferocious, and often isolated, critic of the Bush administration at home and abroad. He now lives in Italy. In Vidal's most recent book, The Last Empire, he argued that 'Americans have no idea of the extent of their government's mischief ... the number of military strikes we have made unprovoked, against other countries, since 1947 is more than 250.'


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: gorevidal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2002 9:18:10 AM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alissa
Rush is right. The left is at its looniest when out of power.

Michael

2 posted on 10/28/2002 9:19:10 AM PST by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
America's most controversial writer Gore Vidal has launched the most scathing attack to date on George W Bush's Presidency, calling for an investigation into the events of 9/11 to discover whether the Bush administration deliberately chose not to act on warnings of Al-Qaeda's plans.

Methinks the energy would be better spent figuring out why the FBI brass bottlenecked intel coming up from below about potential terrorist activity - and whether Clinton's directive to have the FBI spend most of its time on copyright theft and right-wing groups just might have created the problem. Nah, can't be, blame Bush for everything.

3 posted on 10/28/2002 9:20:32 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
Gore Vidal.

He wasn't relevant when he was relevant.

4 posted on 10/28/2002 9:21:19 AM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
If "Gore" is in the name, common sense is out the window.
5 posted on 10/28/2002 9:21:35 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
A few years back, Vidal nearly died of rectal hemoraging, brought on by his confusion over exits and entrances to the human body. It appears that his condition is worsening.
6 posted on 10/28/2002 9:24:49 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Yaaaawwwwnnnn! Same old Gore Vidal. The whackier they are the less people listen. These lunatics discredit themselves.
7 posted on 10/28/2002 9:32:09 AM PST by Sophie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
Vidal, 77, and internationally renowned for his award-winning novels and plays, has long been a ferocious, and often isolated, critic of the Bush administration at home and abroad. He now lives in Italy.

Every cloud has a silver lining. He's 77 (tick, tick tick), he has only one vote (just like me) and best of all, he lives abroad.

All things considered then, his two cents worth counts for not a lot.

8 posted on 10/28/2002 9:36:11 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
A few years back, Vidal nearly died of rectal hemoraging, brought on by his confusion over exits and entrances to the human body.

Vidal should refrain from engaging in this kind of dangerous, unnatural sexual activity, since it appears that the only way he can talk is out his A$$.

9 posted on 10/28/2002 9:36:17 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
'Bush junta' used the terrorist attacks as a pretext to enact a pre-existing agenda to invade Afghanistan and crack down on civil liberties at home.

Yep, ever since he was a little boy, Dubya really wanted to invade Afghanistan. He was hoping that something like this would happen so that he could finally achieve his dream.

I'm upset that Vidal finally revealed this secret!

10 posted on 10/28/2002 9:54:04 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
He and Norman Mailer are nearing the ends of their lives and realize they won't be remembered as great writers. Instead of devoting their lives to writing good, valid bodies of work, they concentrated on being controversial celebrities. Gore is doing the only thing he knows how to do; getting some quick publicity by making an outrageous (as well as predictable) statement, but he knows deep down he has no lasting legacy to leave to American literature.
11 posted on 10/28/2002 9:57:09 AM PST by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
America's most controversial writer Gore Vidal has launched the most scathing attack to date on George W Bush's Presidency, calling for an investigation into the events of 9/11 to discover whether the Bush administration deliberately chose not to act on warnings of Al-Qaeda's plans.

Given the thousands of anti-Bush articles and mountains of abuse directed at the Bush Administration by the Left over the Iraq question, we can clearly see that this senile old fool Vidal is drooling out last night's supper.

This is the same reason that I don't fault Clinton for 911:

Any attempt to take down Bin Laden before 911 would have been met by a tsunami of hatred and lies from the naysayers on the Left.

Gore Vidal is full of it.

12 posted on 10/28/2002 9:57:33 AM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
The die was cast last year long before the attacks on America.

THe Taliban had refused all overtures to allow a pipeline.

They had asked hindus and sikhs to wear identifying symbols.

The Buddhas were blown up.

The Russians and Indians were threatening an antitaliban campaign with Ahmad Shah Massoud.

To me it's a great plus that the Bush Admin had plans to move into Afghanistan regardless of the domestic firestorm it would have created. After the Eleventh, there was no debate about taking out the Taliban. Vidal gets it half right but is so enamored of potraying the US as evil, that he overlooks the evil, horrific nature of the taliban regime and their saudi and pakistani sponsors.
13 posted on 10/28/2002 10:04:21 AM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
The die was cast last year long before the attacks on America.

THe Taliban had refused all overtures to allow a pipeline.

They had asked hindus and sikhs to wear identifying symbols.

The Buddhas were blown up.

Events had reached a boiling point. A few dozen Iranians were massacred by the Taliban. The taliban bombed soccer stadiums in MazariSharif. Off the radar scene of the US media, Americans were not aware that an alliance of Iran, Russia and India was threatening to remove the taliban.
The Russians and Indians were threatening an antitaliban campaign with Ahmad Shah Massoud.

To me it's a great plus that the Bush Admin had plans to move into Afghanistan regardless of the domestic firestorm it would have created. After the Eleventh, there was no debate about taking out the Taliban. Vidal gets it half right but is so enamored of potraying the US as evil, that he overlooks the evil, horrific nature of the taliban regime and their saudi and pakistani sponsors.
14 posted on 10/28/2002 10:06:29 AM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Vidal should refrain from engaging in this kind of dangerous, unnatural sexual activity, since it appears that the only way he can talk is out his A$$.
Not wanting to get too technical, but, in such a scenario, wouldn't he be reduced to mere mumbling instead of outright talking?
15 posted on 10/28/2002 10:18:45 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
Buckley should have socked that queer in the goddamned face.
16 posted on 10/28/2002 10:45:14 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
LOL! I vaguely remember hearing about that exchange, I forget the full story.
17 posted on 10/28/2002 10:52:03 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
You can find a write-up and a video clip of the exchange on this page.
18 posted on 10/28/2002 10:56:10 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
A LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE DEBATE AT THE 1968 DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION IN CHICAGO: (words to the effect)

Gore Vidal (liberal) to Wm. F. Buckley (conservative)--"You're a godammed cryptic Nazi..."

Buckley grabs Vidal by his collar:--"Listen, you little liberal queer, call me a Nazi again and you'll be crapping out your teeth like so many chicklets from a box of gun..."

19 posted on 10/28/2002 11:16:06 AM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Ah! You beat me to it! As soon as I saw old Vidal Sassoon's name, I started to post how more and more after the years have passed, I wished that Buckley had decked the idiot! Thanks for the link! I had been telling my youngsters about the incident for years, and now I get to show it to them!
20 posted on 10/28/2002 11:23:20 AM PST by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson