Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fonda Cuts $$ For Liberals
New York Post PageSix.com ^ | Nov. 4,2002 | Richard Johnson

Posted on 11/04/2002 9:21:43 AM PST by corsair

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:10:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

THE plunge in AOL Time Warner stock has hurt the Democratic Party and its chances of controlling both houses of Congress after tomorrow's elections. Many Democratic candidates across the country were pinched for campaign funds which they might have gotten in years past from Jane Fonda. The ex-wife of Ted Turner is reported to have given $11 million to leftist groups in the year 2000. But since most of her fortune is in AOL Time Warner shares, and the share price has plummeted from a high of $100 since then to less than $15 on Friday, Fonda has not been as generous. And it's not just liberal politicians feeling the pinch. Groups like Planned Parenthood and the Sierra Club, past recipients of Fonda cash, cut back on their advertising budgets this year. "The left-leaning organizations are spending less because they've raised less," said one media consultant. Planned Parenthood is only spending $2 million compared to $10 million in 2000.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democratic; janefonda; liberal; plannedparenthood; sierraclub; stockmarket; tedturner; timewarner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Jane Fonda also gave $100,000 to the Al Gore recount fund. See OpenSecrets.org News Alert 12/8/00 Gore Recount.
1 posted on 11/04/2002 9:21:44 AM PST by corsair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: corsair
Someone get me up to speed, is Fonda stil Born-Again, or has she become Abort-Again?
2 posted on 11/04/2002 9:25:42 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corsair
It's ok that she gives to liberal groups now. Don't forget, she's now a "Christian."
3 posted on 11/04/2002 9:25:43 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corsair
I would have stayed with AOL if I didn't feel like I was giving my money directly to the DNC.
4 posted on 11/04/2002 9:27:48 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
It's ok that she gives to liberal groups now. Don't forget, she's now a "Christian."

Socialism has long been espoused by Christian groups. In fact, the "faith based initiative" proposed by President Bush is a socialist program.

5 posted on 11/04/2002 9:28:33 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Thank you. At least one person hasn't been blinded by Bush's rhetoric in regard to this socialist welfare program. Unfortunately, the conservative mentality nowadays is, "If it helps 'our team', it must be good, liberty be damned."
6 posted on 11/04/2002 9:34:33 AM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: corsair
That's what Democrats get for their risky scheme of investing in the stock market!!!!!
7 posted on 11/04/2002 9:35:10 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corsair
What people of character would ACCEPT money from a woman who has never repudiated being photographed gleefully manning antiaircraft guns against American pilots and American planes during the Vietnam War?
8 posted on 11/04/2002 9:35:53 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corsair
Ship her boney communist ass back to Hanio.
9 posted on 11/04/2002 9:37:17 AM PST by RetiredArmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
In Fonda's defense, it takes all of us awhile to get up to speed once we have been saved. We don't instantly change every attitude we've ever held over night.
10 posted on 11/04/2002 9:41:24 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: corsair
But since most of her fortune is in AOL Time Warner shares

D'OH!!! Bart! Democrats are dumb!

11 posted on 11/04/2002 9:42:37 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Um, this WAS about 30 years ago. People change. Do you have any idea what her stance on the current war is?
12 posted on 11/04/2002 9:43:48 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: corsair
LOL--take THAT, capitalist running-dog!!
13 posted on 11/04/2002 9:47:53 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
I don't recall filmmaker for the Nazis Leni Riefenstahl being accepted into Hollywood (or anywhere else) after the death of her fuhrer because "this was 30 years ago, maybe she's changed" or "she did this in her youth". Its one thing to forgive, its another thing to welcome (in the case of certain organizations, honor) an UNREPETANT traitor with open arms and to accept her dirty money to influence an election in the country whose soldiers she spat on and never apologized to.
14 posted on 11/04/2002 9:48:42 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
People do change. But, the men whose death she caused are still...dead.
15 posted on 11/04/2002 9:49:20 AM PST by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Also, if you want to see Miss Fonda's position on the state of the current wrangle with Iraq, look at her signature to the Not in Our Name website that includes such anti-violence crusaders such as Mumia Abu-Jamal on Pennsylvania's death row for shooting a wounded patrolman between the eyes and rejoicing in it.
16 posted on 11/04/2002 9:50:44 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Can't be certain, but I bet it's something along the lines of severe embarrassment over looking bad. Not embarrassment about her politics during that time, nor about being a huge traitor, but embarrassment and disappointment that she didn't get a damned Nobel prize or something.

On the other hand, does anything embarrass a hardcore leftist? Perhaps a better word would be 'bitterness' that she didn't get some award for it.

17 posted on 11/04/2002 9:50:48 AM PST by Mike-o-Matic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
She is 'Gore-Again'. Hope that helps.
18 posted on 11/04/2002 9:52:44 AM PST by duckman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
It's ok that she gives to liberal groups now. Don't forget, she's now a "Christian."

Don't have the link but she repudiated her "conversion" earlier this year.
19 posted on 11/04/2002 9:53:05 AM PST by Prov1322
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: corsair
Planned Parenthood is only spending $2 million compared to $10 million in 2000.

ONLY $2 MILLION? BTW abortion causes breast cancer: www.AbortionBreastCancer.com - Planned Parenthood kills two birds with one stone.

20 posted on 11/04/2002 9:53:29 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson