Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condoleezza Rice will defeat Hillary Clinton for the 2008 presidency
AnnArborNews ^ | William Safire

Posted on 11/13/2002 8:39:38 AM PST by Dallas

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: Hermann the Cherusker
From your keyboard to God's Ears Herman
101 posted on 11/13/2002 5:41:38 PM PST by crusher999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Guiliani is an even more pathetic candidate than Rice. I'm amazed what the media has allowed him to get away with from having stood around looking important after 9/11.

Neither is pathetic. Rice is a non-politician; Giuliani has more stature than any non-president in the GOP. Name someone who stands taller.

Giuliani didn't stand around LOOKING important after 911, HE WAS IMPORTANT. He was the indispensable man.

The dysfunctional denizens of NYC were looking for their daddy after 9/11. They found it in Guiliani.

Dysfunctional? Daddy? True and true. But in light of what New York enbdured on 911, in taking a hit for the entire nation, those criticisms become oh-so-petty. You can mock New York, because the rest of the country didn't have to find out how it would have stood up. Giuliani and New York stood up for the entire country.

Most of the rest of the country is a little more grown up than to elect him to the Presidency. Guiliani is a adulterous liberal pro-abort traitor to the party (remember that endorsement of Cuomo in 94?).

The only criticism that sticks is his endorsement of Cuomo. He had been living apart from his wife for years, before he took up with Judi Nathan. The abortion issue is a non-starter, because the GOP is not going to do ANYTHING about abortion.

Where's he going to get the votes from to put him on the Republican ticket?

Where? Everywhere!

102 posted on 11/13/2002 5:56:13 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
What substantive act has Guiliani done in the wake of 9/11?

Also, I seem to recall while living in Manhattan that Guiliani and wife were living in Gracie Mansion together when he carried on his public and notorious affair, and that he had the class to let her know he wanted a divorce by holding a press conference on the subject.

America will surely be blessed by electing a guy like him.

Guiliani is a cop, not a President. Don't mistake the two.

103 posted on 11/13/2002 6:24:11 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
LOL....actually, you nailed Mr. Jeeves, and not me.
104 posted on 11/13/2002 7:25:10 PM PST by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Thanks for the ping.

She's excellent, and perceived as a threat by gutter leftists--witness the attacks of late.

No doubt orchestrated by Das Butch der Buchenvald.

105 posted on 11/13/2002 8:41:00 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
The soft-spoken Safire reminded the crowd that there was a time people doubted Japan and Germany could ever become democracies. "It can happen anywhere if people give it a chance," he said, referring to the Middle East.

From your lips to Gods ear!
106 posted on 11/13/2002 10:27:17 PM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Go Condoleezza, Go!! I love you!! You have my vote, my active support and my campaign contributions if you ever decide to run!!!


107 posted on 11/13/2002 10:40:12 PM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
" PREDICTION: Hildabeast will never be given a nomination to the Presidency. "

PREDICTION : Your prediction will be proven wrong in about a year or so .
108 posted on 11/13/2002 10:43:09 PM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: wideawake issue does not make for good government, try to remember we do have laws and Republicans follow the rule of law.
109 posted on 11/14/2002 6:16:25 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Human life is not an "issue". Respect for human life marks the distinction between a barbarous society and a civilized one.

Being an American does not mean docilely accepting genocides decreed from above by unelected judges. It means fighting for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - not standing by while the most innocent are deprived of life.

110 posted on 11/14/2002 6:23:44 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Until the Roe v. Wade is changed, all argument is just that argument. You have to change the law so join others in suites across the nation to have the existing law changed.

BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C. J., and DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL, and POWELL, JJ., joined. BURGER, C. J., post, p. 207, DOUGLAS, J. post, p. 209, and STEWART, J., post, p. 167, filed concurring opinions. WHITE, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, J., joined, post, p. 221. filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 171.

111 posted on 11/14/2002 6:39:14 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: yoe
You don't change the law by electing a pro-abortionist who has no desire to change the law.

Rice is poison - she's good at what she does: helping us kill our enemies. We don't need her in the White House helping us kill our children.

112 posted on 11/14/2002 6:46:49 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: calenel
I like Dr. Rice because she is brilliant and accomplished, particularly in the international arena since, as you suggest, we may be "in an all-out shooting war with Islam by then."

Then how come no one is crying "Bush/Wolfowitz in 2004"?

Dr. Rice is indeed brilliant and accomplished, but if she were a white male she would just be another one among 500 brilliant and accomplished defense policy analysts, mostly white men. She is not a politician and has no particular qualifications to be President, other than that many Republicans think she can neutralize a potential tidal wave of female and black votes for Hillary Clinton. I'm not so sure Dr. Rice can do that - too many blacks already think she is a freak show act who is "unrepresentative" of their community, and the kind of women who think Hillary is wonderful will disdain her candidacy.

113 posted on 11/14/2002 7:10:35 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
North Carolina guy here too....Winston-Salem area, but according to most of the rest of the country, ALL of NC is rural....
114 posted on 11/14/2002 7:21:36 AM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
...and you don't elect people who will appoint socialists/liberals to the Supreme Court.

It is our individual performances, no matter how humble our place in life my be, that will in the long run determine how well ordered the nation/world may become

Or how civilized we will become...action, take action within your own state for starters; know your legislators well before you vote them into office for this is where change will begin.

115 posted on 11/14/2002 7:22:43 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
#16, I couldn’t agree with you more.....Condi will not run for President or Vice President at all. She is an academic, not a politician

# 33 says this... my favorable view of Condi has nothing to do with her being either female or black. My sentiments also. She is brilliant no doubt about it, but not presidential material in the need-to-be political sense. Hillary Clinton is tarnished beyond repair except for editorialists like Wm. Saffire and the mainstream press, who will for the sake of a story keep the ignominious Clintons alive. They many be amused, but I’m not!

116 posted on 11/14/2002 7:35:50 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
117 posted on 11/14/2002 10:14:55 AM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
"Then how come no one is crying 'Bush/Wolfowitz in 2004'?"

Actually, I have suggested Rumsfeld/Rice in 2008, although Rumsfeld might be too old.

The difference between Wolfowitz and Rice is this: I haven't been watching Wolfowitz since before the 2000 election, and have been watching Rice. Wolfowitz may very well be equally brilliant and accomplished, but I haven't reached a personal certainty regarding him.
118 posted on 11/14/2002 3:04:36 PM PST by calenel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson