Skip to comments.
DNC Chair Calls on President Bush to Denounce Trent Lott's Comments on Race [Dream on, Terry Mac!]
ABC News Political Exclusive ^
| December 11, 2002
| Liz Wilner
Posted on 12/11/2002 8:03:34 AM PST by ewing
The Macker [DNC Chair McAuliffe] was due to add the following comments this morning at the Presidential Primary 'Politcs and Eggs' breakfast in Beford, New Hampshire.
'Given this pattern, [of Lott's repeated racial statements] it is simply not credible for Senator Lott to continue to assert that the comments that he made in support of Senator Thurmond's segregationist campaign were anything more 'than a poor choice of words.'
Sadly, it would rather appear that these comments reflect Senator Lott's true prejudices on race.'
'The time has come for leaders of the Republican Party to speak out against Senator Lott's remarks.
I call on George Bush and Marc Racicot Chairman of the Republican Party, to denounce Senator Lott's comments..'
'Likewise I join incoming Congressional Black Caucus Chair Representative Elijah Cummings is expressing concern with Senator Lott's fitness to serve as leader of the United States Senate.'
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: breakfastspeech; comments; dreaming; themackster; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
The Rove/Bush RNC team is not touching this with a ten foot pole!
Ari already gave the Administrations 'final position' yesterday on the matter-smart move.
1
posted on
12/11/2002 8:03:34 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
To quote Neal Boortz in today's nuze,
"Trent Lott doesnt need to resign because of his bordering-on-idiotic remarks at Strom Thurmonds 100th birthday party. He needs to be kicked out. The Senate Republicans need to step in and make it crystal clear that Trent Lott is no longer needed in a leadership role in the United States Senate.
Its happened twice now, not just once. The first time was about 20 years ago, then again last week. Trent Lott telling an audience that if Strom Thurmond had been elected in 1948 we wouldnt have had all these problems weve been having.
Look
Thurmonds candidacy in 1948 was about one thing. One thing only. It was all about opposition to Trumans civil rights agenda. It was a segregation forever campaign. The only issue. So, when someone says that a Thurmond victory would have prevented problems, the only rational inference that can be drawn is that the problems being spoken of are the problems associated with integration
problems associated with the actual realization of the implementation of our Constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law.
Lotts apology was so weak. Both of them were weak. Somehow he just couldnt bring himself to say that the platform of the Dixiecrat Party in 1948 was anti-American and an abomination to our Constitution. He just couldnt bring himself to say that each and every citizen in our country is entitled to equal protection under our laws, and that the legacy of segregation is a point of shame, not a point of celebration.
There are many fine Republicans in the U.S. Senate who could serve as the Senate Majority Leader without the racial baggage. The bulk of the Republican agenda carries favorable implications for black Americans .. but how in the hell does the party expect to attract black members and voters with Trent Lott drawling on and on about what a good president Strom Thurmond would have made?"
To: ewing
Seems like all the liberals can do is lie in wait for a conservative to make a mistake so they can pretend like they are oh so offended and can take off on a "Magical Mystery Victim Tour" to display their "wounds" for all to admire and sympathize with.
To: ewing
why is everybody so dern sure that Lott was referring only to race when he said that things would be better had Thurmond won?
4
posted on
12/11/2002 8:08:36 AM PST
by
camle
To: ewing
In this situation the less said the better. Anything Bush
or any other Republican says won't satisfy the blood lust
of the Deomcrats. Lott got himself into this mess, let him
get himself out of it.
5
posted on
12/11/2002 8:09:38 AM PST
by
Russ
To: capt. norm
Yep, its a Victimziation/Disenfanchisement 2002 vintage whine..
6
posted on
12/11/2002 8:09:57 AM PST
by
ewing
To: camle
Well camle... the reason for being for the dixiecrats was to protest integration. They were segregationists, and proud of it. That was their only major issue in 1948. It wasn't the capital gains tax cut, it wasn't abortion, the second amendment, free trade, the earned income tax credit... it was segregation. Period.
I don't see how Lott could be confused about this.
7
posted on
12/11/2002 8:11:15 AM PST
by
dogbyte12
To: ewing
Gosh, how original. The left is playing the race card again.
Nice to know that the DNC hasn't picked up a clue from the elections. Sling mud, sling mud, sling mud, and hope something gets traction.
The real thing to remember about all this crapola is that nobody from Jessie Jackson to AlGore to Terry Mac is remotely outraged about this. The funny thing is that most conservatives would like to see Lott gone a lot more than anybody on the left does. The sad thing is that the left seems perfectly happy starting a race war if they think it will get them power.
To: Mudboy Slim; Landru; sultan88
Here comes that snowball rollin' downhill.
Be a whole lot easier just to tell these phony S.O.B.'s to go plumb square to hell.
9
posted on
12/11/2002 8:11:27 AM PST
by
jla
To: ewing
Sure, Bush should say he will.....when McAwful denounces Je$$e for "Hymietown", Byrd (D-KKK) for "white n!gger", etc.
To: Russ
Yep...Lott needs to get HIMSELF out of this on his own (but I sure bet he's getting advice!)
To: Russ
Ari did a good job of handling this yesterday saying that the White House has accepted Lott's apology and declaring that nothing more would be said about it.
12
posted on
12/11/2002 8:12:48 AM PST
by
ewing
To: Corporate Law
Am I mistaken, or do you remember RACIST remarks made by Julian Bond and other blacks at the NAACP convention last year in Atlanta -- the one Bush didn't go to?
I seem to recall this, but can't find a reference to it.
Now, I do realize that there is NO way they could be confronted with their own racism -- they'd just say it's not the same.
I just wanted to remember to keep my brain from exploding!
13
posted on
12/11/2002 8:16:01 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: Richard Kimball
Yes, where was Terry Mac on KKK "White N*igger' Byrd, 'Hymie Town' Jackson and Calipso Louies 'Bloodsucking Jews' commentary?
14
posted on
12/11/2002 8:16:37 AM PST
by
ewing
To: jla; Landru; Mudboy Slim
"...tell these phony S.O.B.'s to go plumb square to hell."Exactly!! It is now time for our side to go on the offensive!
15
posted on
12/11/2002 8:25:29 AM PST
by
sultan88
To: sultan88
"...time for our side to go on the offensive!" Couldn't agree more...INDICT Terry McAuliffe...NOW!!
FReegards...MUD
To: ewing
"Congressional Black Caucus Chair Representative Elijah Cummings" is an Unabashed RACIST and should be ignored as irrelevant...MUD
To: Russ
It's time for Lott to call a press conference to address this.
18
posted on
12/11/2002 8:29:38 AM PST
by
ewing
To: Howlin
It rings a bell. Bond says something insulting every time he opens his mouth anymore so I might be confused.
To: jla; Landru
"...tell these phony S.O.B.'s to go plumb square to hell." Exactly...MUD
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson