The louder the World screams, the more convinced I am that the US is right.

http://www.briansbrain.com | Me

[Eaker]

Obviously, you don't have the evidence.

Personally?? You flatter me. I am not a Cabinet Level Government Appointee.

However, I finally, after a long near decade, have a President that I trust to do the right thing.

The purpose of the military is to defend the U.S. not to "build democracy" or protect Israel or provide a "counterweight" to Saudi Arabia.

Now you flatter yourself. If you haven't noticed President Bush is Commander in Chief, you are not. Haven't you noticed that you are not invited to the Pentagon very often??

I'll trust My President to take care of business, and for you to stay out of his way.

Stay safe; stay armed.
Eaker Freeper Status

[talleyman]

1)Since WWII anyway, the democrats have never been "warmongers", nor have freepers ever been peaceniks.
2)Perhaps you have been consistent - if so, then you have been consistently wrong.
3)And I don't determine my views by reference to the other side, either. I merely point out the logical political home for the ideas you espouse. If you find that offensive, perhaps you should rethink the ideas.
4)Why do you need three names to post? One will do.

[DrCarl]

>the more convinced I become that what the President is doing is right.

I only disagree in that I was totally convinced on day one, so I can't become more covinced.

[rocknotsand]

Zero tolerance policy on street gangs. Can it be applied to Foreign policy?

Idi Amin, Pol Pot, Ferdinand Marcos, Noreiga are just some examples of geo-political quality control or street policing. We knock 'em over and keep knocking 'em over. Because we can or because its the right thing?

Hmmm. The leaders in the oval office sit there with the intel reports and bullet points re WMD and they weigh it all up: party interest, personal interest of the President, national interest, UN-NWO interest. This has been the case for a long long time.

Klinton quite obviously put the other interests over national interest and he got his Nobel paycheck and his Irish backslap too. Meanwhile, SB Laden saw the opportunity to...

Sorting out the Islamo-Fascist gangland that is the ME is in our national long term interest. Beijing is watching with interest. Their star is on the rise -it is only a question of how long before they get to the top. And the liberal representative democracy model must must must succeed as the model of national govt around the world. There are many oligarchies working against that outcome, including, surprisingly, the socialist majorities running Germany and France at the moment. Ho hum.

And roll on SDI.

[Burkeman1]

The comparison of Bush to Clinton on foreign policy is unfair. While I believe Bush's foreign policy to be dangerous and ill advised at least he has one. The Clinton administratin had no foreign policy whatsoever and this country was rudderless on the international stage for 8 years. His deriliction in the face of numerous terrorist attacks (including, possibly, TWA flight 800) and his use of our military to distract from domestic political woes was absolutley criminal.

[Austin Willard Wright]

Democrats have never been warmongers? Time to go back to the history books. Remember Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Haiti, the Dominican Republic? As Bob Dole so accurately said in 1976 in his debate with Mondale, "every war in this century has been a Democrat War." Of course, there have been GOP wars since then but plenty of Democrat wars too.

The majority of Democrats have supported Dubya on Iraq. Your friend Hillary voted for the "warmongering" war resolution in October as did your other friends Tommy Daschles and Dick Gephardt. I would have voted against it! Perhaps you should go to DU, not me. I say a plague on both on both their houses who have mutually embraced the Demopublican "bi-partisan" Wilsonian foreign policy.

I am sorry that apparently your mother didn't think enough of you to give you a middle name or, if she did, that you are so ashamed of it.

[driftless]

I tend to agree. I only take other conservatives dissenting views seriously. If a liberal agrees with something Bush does, I wonder what he (Bush) did wrong. Liberals serve as perfect reverse barometers.

[Terridan]

Brilliantly stated!
Best wishes...

[Terridan]

Hey, now that ya mention it, HIT THEM ALL AT ONCE, WHY WAIT?
I would gladly support it! :0 Have a great day!

[Austin Willard Wright]

Hit them all at once? You seem to enjoy spending unlimited amounts of the taxpayers money on Wilsonian cruades. Don't you think that the American taxpayer is already overburned? Obviously not.

[talleyman]

If you cannot see the difference between Korea and Haiti, it would explain much of your discourse.

And yes, after failing to derail support for our President, the demonrats avoided political suicide by voting with the prevailing wind.

BTW, I acquired numerous things in the course of my development and birth. I have an a##, too, I just don't feel the need to show it to the world. Whom are you trying to impress?

[Terridan]

Yeah, its overburdened with theivin' politicians... but know what? We won't have anything left to pay taxes for if we don't get them all before they get us... I'm to old to learn chinese, korean, or any of the God da$#ed arabic languages... have a nice day...
See, its easier to hit them all and get it over with...
survival. ;)

[Terridan]

PS... Where is your concern regarding the illegal spending to keep illegals in services here? They are already bankrupting our system, schools, medical and social services, far more than any war could.