Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair: Iraq's U.N. Concessions 'Suspect' [going wobbly?]
Associated Press ^ | February 15, 2003 | Ed Johnson

Posted on 02/15/2003 3:23:29 AM PST by AntiGuv

LONDON - Iraqi concessions to United Nations weapons inspectors are "suspect," Prime Minister Tony Blair told his ruling Labor Party Saturday.

Blair said he was still committed to solving the Iraq crisis through the United Nations and said weapons inspectors would be given more time. But he insisted Saddam Hussein must be dealt with.

"The concessions are suspect, unfortunately the weapons are real," he told a party conference in Glasgow, Scotland.

"I still believe in the United Nations," Blair said. "I continue to want to solve the issue of Iraq and weapons of mass destruction through the U.N."

He said inspections should not drag on, as they did immediately after the Gulf War in 1991, without full Iraqi cooperation.

"The time needed is not the time that it takes the inspectors to discover the weapons. They are not a detective agency," Blair said.

He added: "The time is the time necessary to make a judgment: is Saddam prepared to cooperate fully or not? If he is, the inspectors can take as much time as they want.

"If he is not, if this is a repeat of the 1990s, and I fear that it is, let us be under no doubt about what is at stake."

In a bid to boost Britain and the United States' tough stance on Iraq, Blair said Saddam had already killed people with chemical weapons.

"Iraq under Saddam became the first country to use chemical weapons against its own people," Blair said.

"Are we sure that if we allow him to keep such weapons he will not use them again?"

He said terrorism and weapons of mass destruction in the hands of rogue states were "twins of chaos," posing a new and grave danger of the world.

Although Blair has enthusiastically rallied behind Washington's tough stance on Iraq, opposition to war in Britain is strong. Successive opinion polls indicate a large majority of Britons oppose military action against Saddam's regime without U.N. backing.

Blair's speech to Labor Party delegates in Glasgow comes a day after the report of the chief U.N. inspectors gave fresh encouragement to opponents of military action.

Chief inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei avoided harsh criticism of the Iraqi regime when they reported to the Security Council Friday. Instead of galvanizing support for a quick war, the majority of council members cited the inspectors' reports of improved Iraqi cooperation to call for renewed efforts to peacefully disarm Saddam.

Several senior Labor lawmakers planned to take part in a rally in London on Saturday, and they have been sharply critical of the prime minister's passionate support of President Bush.

Fifty-seven lawmakers, most from Labor, signed a motion Thursday demanding Britain stay out of a war unless it is authorized by Parliament. Ministers have promised lawmakers a substantive vote on any war, but not necessarily before troops are sent into action.

Labor chairman John Reid acknowledged Friday there was "widespread anxiety" in the party about the government's tough stance on Iraq, but he defended Blair's leadership.

"It is ... the duty of leaders to lead, to say it as they see it, to be honest with the party and with the people, especially when they believe this country and the world to be in peril," he told delegates in Glasgow.

Britain's finance chief, Chancellor Gordon Brown and Home Secretary David Blunkett also rallied behind their leader.

"In the difficult decisions he has to make for our country, we should all give Tony Blair, the leader of our party, our full support as he seeks to find an international way forward for the necessary disarmament of Saddam Hussein," said Brown.

High-profile supporters of Saturday's rally in London include the capital's mayor, Ken Livingstone; human rights campaigner Bianca Jagger; playwright Harold Pinter; the leader of Britain's opposition Liberal Democrats, Charles Kennedy; and U.S. civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blair; inspections; iraq; unitednations

1 posted on 02/15/2003 3:23:29 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
The concessions are supect, the weapons are real.....If there are one millions marchers for peace that's still less than the number Saddam has killed Are you willing to allow Saddam to kill another million. If we show weakness now, the menace will grow...

The opposition to war is welcomed by Saddam.....

Are we sure Hussein will not use chemical weapons again?

There are consquences paid in blood for leaving saddam in power

ridding then world of Saddam will be an act of humanity

2 posted on 02/15/2003 3:25:38 AM PST by The Wizard (Demonrats are enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Blair said he was still committed to solving the Iraq crisis through the United Nations and said weapons inspectors would be given more time.

The AP header is almost identical to the BBC's on this same speech. Yet the quotes do not support the header. If anything, Blair's remarks about the inspectors being given more time were used in a rhetorically sarcastic way.

The press is either being being obtuse or wilfully misrepresenting Prime Minister Blair's remarks. The war's already on, and you can see it in the behavior of the Left. All peacetime rules of civility and fairness have been suspended. Their attitude is: "by any means necessary". So be it.
3 posted on 02/15/2003 3:39:25 AM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
I watched this speech live from USA on fox and it was Spectacular!!
The transcripts are all over the net, but i have yet to find an audio file. YOU must hear it, or read it.
It was simply brilliant, and so very well delivered.
If anybody finds the audio file link, please post it for me.
Mr. Blair made it clear that Saddam needs to disarm or be disarmed.
4 posted on 02/15/2003 4:25:12 AM PST by ZAKJAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZAKJAN
Hawkish Blair Says UN Must Act on Iraq

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20030215_47.html
5 posted on 02/15/2003 5:04:39 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
It seems that the UN is all and mighty since they can't just say to the UN get lost...What is up with that?
6 posted on 02/15/2003 5:05:47 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
The media RATS focused on that one line about giving inspectors more time (as if a week or two matters anyway). I'm not exactly sure why...unless they want to give the American people the impression that Blair is going soft, or that London and Washington are at odds over inspections.
7 posted on 02/15/2003 7:25:40 AM PST by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
The media RATS focused on that one line about giving inspectors more time....

Yes. They need more time.......right up until the next New Moon on March 3. Then the war will start.

8 posted on 02/15/2003 7:38:38 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
""The concessions are suspect, unfortunately the weapons are real," he told a party conference in Glasgow, Scotland."

I sincerely believe that Prime Minister Blair would not say this unless it were absolutely true. In fact, the drooling anti-war idiots believe it too, or they wouldn't keep telling us that if the Coalition of the Willing attacks Iraq, Saddam will retaliate with weapons of mass distruction that both the drooling anti-war idiots and Saddam say Iraq does not have.

I guess inspectors get two more weeks...ah well...the schedule is still proceeding according to plan.

9 posted on 02/15/2003 7:40:34 AM PST by cake_crumb (Without dictators, what reason would we have to keep the UN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
To the British public: If you do not want him, send him here. He is a brave soldier going against the polls for what is right! He is a hero here!
10 posted on 02/15/2003 8:26:45 AM PST by whadizit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Attack on Iraq Betting Pool
11 posted on 02/15/2003 2:28:23 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson