Skip to comments.
CBS, White House in Dispute Over Saddam Interview
reuters ^
| 2/26/03
Posted on 02/26/2003 10:04:23 AM PST by knak
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House criticized CBS television on Wednesday over what a spokesman said was a spurned offer to rebut comments by Iraqi President Saddam Hussein during an interview to be broadcast on Wednesday evening.
"This seems odd they wouldn't let the White House have a voice," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer told Reuters.
He said the White House had offered a representative to counter what he said would be propaganda, lies and irresponsible statements by Saddam in the rare interview, but he said CBS replied it was interested only if President Bush made the response himself.
CBS rejected the charge and said it remained open to providing a forum for a top Bush administration official to respond to Saddam on the air.
"The conversation was never President Bush or no one," CBS News spokeswoman Sandy Genelius said. The White House had initially offered to send Fleischer for brief comments, but this was not accepted, she said. Fleischer denied that the White House had suggested any names.
CBS made a new offer on Wednesday, Genelius said. "If the president, the vice president or Secretary of State (Colin) Powell would like to appear on the program tonight we would be happy to have them appear on the program," Genelius said.
CBS was to air the interview by news anchor Dan Rather at 9:00 p.m. EST on its "60 Minutes II" program.
Recorded on Monday, it is the first interview Saddam has granted an American journalist in 13 years and comes as the United Nations prepares to debate whether to authorize a war on Iraq to enforce disarmament demands.
With saturation coverage by U.S. and international media, Bush has repeatedly accused Saddam of defying U.N. demands that he dismantle weapons of mass destruction programs -- a charge the Iraqi leader denies -- and of threatening to spread chemical, biological or nuclear weapons to terrorists. He is due to give another speech on Iraq earlier on Wednesday evening.
Fleischer said he was not concerned that Saddam's interview could sway opinion. "The American people can handle an interview with Saddam Hussein, but fairness suggests that the administration have a voice."
He acknowledged the interview was a journalistic coup for CBS, for which he said the network deserved congratulations.
"But it's also important to recognize, in the name of balance and in the name of not making a moral equivalence between a dictator and a democracy, that Iraq engages in propaganda and they will continue to engage in propaganda," he said.
A Bush administration officials also raised questions over the manner in which the interview was conducted, saying such conditions would never be accepted if set by Bush. The interview was filmed by Iraqi television, which also provided a translation and pieced together videotape from three separate cameras into a single recording.
Genelius said it is customary for Iraq to do the filming for such interviews, that CBS made a separate translation and that there appeared to be no deletions of the 1 hour, 45-minute interview in the final tape given to CBS. The interview will be edited to fit the program's one-hour length.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; cbs; danrather; defendedclinton; dupe; februarysweeps; gulfwarii; hussein; imanidiot; interviewsliars; iraq; lordhawhaw; mediabias; newsscoop; propaganda; ratherbiased; ratings; ratingsbook; ratingstrick; saddam; saddamhussein; saddamites; seebs; sweeps; sweepsperiod; tokiorose; tokyorose; traitor; usefulidiot; viacom; viacommie; viacompaidhillary; whatsthefrequency; whatstheratings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: knak
What I really wanted to see is Saddam lower Danny boy into one of his acid pits. Now that is must see TV.
41
posted on
02/26/2003 11:07:36 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Bill and Hillary's first instinct is survival.....their second is to lie.)
To: WomanofStandard
Dan Rather has this interview under his belt only because "his good friend Ramsey Clark set it up with Saddam for him".
HURL ALERT
Comment #43 Removed by Moderator
To: Real Cynic No More
Dan Rather and CBS don't share all the responsibility, but they share the primary responsibility for the public's loss of support for our soldiers in VietNam, responsible for our returning soldiers being called "baby-killers".They are also primarily responsible for allowing Pol Pot to murder 2 million Cambodians.
44
posted on
02/26/2003 11:17:39 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: aShepard
the RATS would insist on a "pre-buttal" like with the SOTU address.
Pre-buttal....nope, I won't even go there today. :^)
Prairie
45
posted on
02/26/2003 11:27:44 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(Watching the French self-destruct.............PRICELESS!!!)
To: knak
No way Bush will go on live with Dan Rather. He has got to remember what happened with his dad and Rather.
46
posted on
02/26/2003 11:27:59 AM PST
by
kjam22
To: kjam22
No way Bush will go on live with Dan Rather. He has got to remember what happened with his dad and Rather. Bush shouldn't lower himself for the lefties. He should continue to remain above them. He's the president, not just another stupid leftie.
He has a job to do. Let the children play. The president has "grown up stuff" to tend to. Really.
The audacity of the left to even consider they're worthy of his time.
As an ordinary citizen, the left isn't even worthy of my time!
47
posted on
02/26/2003 11:41:01 AM PST
by
concerned about politics
( Stop Taxpayer Supported Socialist Indoctrination. Vote for Freedom - Vote School Choice.)
To: knak
BERNARD GOLDBERG WAS RIGHT
To: knak
BERNARD GOLDBERG WAS RIGHT
To: knak
50
posted on
02/26/2003 11:48:58 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
To: knak
CBS should not be allowed inside any White House press conference again until they clean up their act.
To: ex-Texan
I'm with you ex-Tex, I wish the FBI or Homeland Security or something would swoop in and shut this network of communist diarrhea down!! Rather is an IDIOT!!
52
posted on
02/26/2003 11:57:25 AM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(all us Western Canuks belong South)
To: GirlShortstop
Hurling ...
After the Gulf War, in 1991, Clark initiated a war-crimes tribunal, which tried and found guilty President George Bush and Generals Colin Powell and Norman Schwarzkopf, among others. Clark went on to write a book, The Fire This Time (Thunder's Mouth Press), describing the crimes he says were committed by U.S. and NATO forces during the Gulf War. When asked why he focuses on the crimes of his own country, instead of those committed by Iraq, Clark says that we, as citizens, need to announce our principles and "force our government to adhere to them. When you see your government violating those principles, you have the highest obligation to correct what your government does, not point the finger at someone else."
53
posted on
02/26/2003 12:00:19 PM PST
by
flamefront
(Take the oil money from the islamofascists!)
To: clamboat
I clicked on your screen name because I thought you might be a libertarian.
54
posted on
02/26/2003 12:04:02 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
To: Bars4Bill
is it just me or does Saddam have devilish red eyes in that photo? his true colors show through..
55
posted on
02/26/2003 12:05:13 PM PST
by
honeygrl
To: knak
Last night Letterman suggested that Bush should take up Saddam on his debate offer, and volunteered format guidelines. They showed Saddam as if he were giving his three-minute opening statement, and then showed Bush's three-minute response: night-vision photography of the first bombing of Baghdad.
56
posted on
02/26/2003 12:11:07 PM PST
by
GretchenEE
(You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: princess leah
CBS should leave will enough alone and just show Arsenio and Star Search!
To: knak
This is amazing, our maisteam media is painting a dictator who is worse than Hitler (there is no record of Hitler ever personally murdering someone but Sodom has gleefully personally murdered many people)as a good guy and at the same time is portaying Pesident Bush (who is only tying to enforce UN rules that have been in place for over a decade) as the pinicle of evil. Who owns CBS? I mean who are the top 100 share holders even the ones behind front companies? Is there a way to find out on line?
58
posted on
02/26/2003 12:57:59 PM PST
by
fella
To: knak
An opportunity lost. If the CIA had planted a remote controlled explosive device in GungaDan we could have liberated oppressed masses in 2 countries at the same time.
59
posted on
02/26/2003 12:59:15 PM PST
by
freepy smurf
(Time wounds all heels.)
To: mabelkitty
Oh silly. When the news people say something, they are being unbiased and fair! There is no need for a rebuttal. It is only when an evil, stupid misguided conservative says something that calls for a fairness speech after.
Jeesh, i thought everyone knew that.
60
posted on
02/26/2003 1:01:03 PM PST
by
LaraCroft
('Bout time)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson