Skip to comments.
NEW CLAIM OF
IRAQ-QAEDA TIE
New York Post ^
| 3/01/03
| JOHN LEHMANN
Posted on 03/01/2003 12:29:36 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:12:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
March 1, 2003 -- A Manhattan federal judge heard yesterday how Iraq had trained Islamic terrorists at a secret camp where simulated hijackings were carried out.
Lawyers for families of two Sept. 11 victims suing Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden for more than $1 million said al Qaeda officials had meetings with Iraqis including Saddam.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alani; atta; czechoslavakia; czechs; hussein; iraq; saddam; saddamhussein
1
posted on
03/01/2003 12:29:36 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
send in th lawyers.
2
posted on
03/01/2003 12:34:34 AM PST
by
js1138
To: kattracks
To: kattracks
and sadaam thought he had trouble with George Bush and the United States Marines...
now the trial lawyers got him....
these folks will get millions in damages, to be paid for by the proceeds of oil in Iraq... oh my... and the trial lawyers will give their cut to hillary...
< heh heh >
4
posted on
03/01/2003 12:43:09 AM PST
by
Robert_Paulson2
(Mr. 29a... needs to be convicted.)
To: kattracks; Alamo-Girl; JohnHuang2; hellinahandcart
Anti-war conservatives say that this meeting never occurred and that it has been debunked.
I sure would like a definitive answer about this.
5
posted on
03/01/2003 3:05:11 AM PST
by
sauropod
(Excellence in Shameless Self Promotion (I AM always right...))
To: sauropod
Atta met al-Ani...and he did so on more than one occasion. Several, actually. And he's not the only hijacker to meet with Iraqi agents and "diplomats," at least two others did as well, although in their cases it was in the Middle east and not Prague.
Ther's more proof, travel docs, and named sources both US and Czech on those meetings than there is on other things the press routinely assumes is true.
Yet the same people who diss the meetings are more than willing to accept swill from unnamed sources as true.
6
posted on
03/01/2003 4:40:27 AM PST
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
7
posted on
03/01/2003 4:59:34 AM PST
by
Momaw Nadon
(The mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work unless it's open.)
To: piasa
I think too much effort is being expended on attempting to prove an ongoing working relationship between al Qaeda and the Iraqi government because the socialists and their followers put this issue in play knowing full well the futility of undercovering irrefutable evidence of such a relationship. My view is the al Qaeda is acting as an organized group of professional hitmen available for hire. As we know in this country individual contracts for killings by professional hitmen are not very susceptible to proof in the absence of confessions generally given as a result of plea bargaining or grants of immunity. Terrorist acts contracted by the intelligency agencies of despotic governments are even more difficult to prove. I think Saddam views al Qaeda as just another delivery system for his weapons of mass destruction or other terror inducing tactics. This latter view is somewhat confirmed by the antiwar activists constant harping that a war would only incite further terrorist acts by outside Iraq.
8
posted on
03/01/2003 5:29:13 AM PST
by
monocle
To: monocle
My view is the al Qaeda is acting as an organized group of professional hitmen available for hire. Bingo.
That's why so many people don't get it- they're all assuming there has to be an ideological mind-meld for there to be a link and so, they insist there is no link.
There are quite a tidy number of links surfacing though, regardless of the efforts to diss them. It's just that every time some links come up, they are ignored because they don't fit in with their preconceived agenda.
9
posted on
03/01/2003 6:03:34 AM PST
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: sauropod
Thanks for your post!
There were challenges, but as far as I know, it has not been debunked. It and all things pointing to Iraq in the anthrax attacks have been obscured - we suspect in order to buy time for the US, UK, Israel, etc. to stockpile drugs and develop methods to deal with a biochem WMD before correcting the situation in Iraq.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson