Posted on 03/07/2003 7:35:36 AM PST by scripter
Don't.
And any ?children? that were present were teenagers? don?t try to make it sound like they were kindergarteners
They were under the age of consent. It's 15 year olds now; it'll be 6 year olds in a decade. You're not going to assert that 'Queering Elementary Education' doesn't exist, are you?
The citizens in that room were victimized by the man with a recording device and an agenda.
You betcha. Me, I don't have coversations with underage teens that I wouldn't be willing to have made public. What have they got to hide?
Oh, wait, we know the answer to that.
I don?t ?advocate? for anything that goes on between consenting adults in private. Would YOU like to control the sex lives of others? A little Texas-style ?barging into the bedroom??
Ten years go, I would have been with you on this. However, I've been ineluctably drawn to the conclusion this really isn't about privacy. It's about transforming society, including the education of children, concepts of what is and isn't public decency, and heterosexual relations, none of which has a damn thing to do with what two men do together in a bedroom. It's about getting sexual access to ever younger adolescents. It's an agenda, usually disavowed but ever more frequently being acknowledged. And, since homosexuals are increasingly invading what I consider my space, I see no particular reason why I should respect theirs.
The site contact information was updated October 2002 and expires October 2005. It's ridiculous for gays to state NAMBLA isn't a viable organization because the copyright on their website hasn't been updated.Domain ID:D560828-LROR Domain Name:NAMBLA.ORG Created On:11-Oct-1996 04:00:00 UTC Last Updated On:19-Oct-2002 02:47:36 UTC Expiration Date:10-Oct-2005 04:00:00 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:R11-LROR
News reports. One of the workshops was explicitly directed at ages 14-21. You know this as well as I do. You are not attempting intellectually honest discussion here. Your purpose is to disrupt a conservative forum.
You're not going to assert that 'Queering Elementary Education' doesn't exist, are you?
I've never heard of anything called that
It was mentioned earlier in the thread. It's been widely reviewed in the gay literature. You claim to have atttended the GLSEN conference, yet you haven't heard of it? Please!
http://www.jtsears.com/qee.htm
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0847693694/qid%3D993047913/sr%3D1-1/ref%3Dsc%5Fb%5F1/002-2304555-1853602
http://gaytoday.com/garchive/reviews/020700re.htm
A good start.
Recruit - you can say that again. When I was at Cleveland State University, the student newspaper was always chock-full of ads seeking fresh 'meat'. It was like a marketing system. I used to laugh at them, but its obvious that there is a deliberate effort being made to draw young people. And yet, they claim that homosexuality is a condition with which people are born. If people are born "gay", they why do they market the idea?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.